Comparison of Discrete Choice and Machine Learning Models for Simultaneous Modeling of Mobility Tool Ownership in Agent-Based Travel Demand Models

被引:0
|
作者
Puschel, Jasper [1 ]
Barthelmes, Lukas [1 ]
Kagerbauer, Martin [1 ]
Vortisch, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Inst Transport Studies, Karlsruhe, Germany
关键词
decision analysis and processes; decision making; mobility tools; neural networks; discrete choice models; planning methods; transportation demand forecasting; MULTILAYER FEEDFORWARD NETWORKS; CAR; MOBITOPP;
D O I
10.1177/03611981231206175
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Individual travel behavior, such as mode choice, is determined to a distinct degree by the respective portfolio of available mobility tools, such as the number of cars, public transit pass ownership, or a carsharing membership. However, the choice of different mobility tools is interdependent, and individuals weigh alternatives against each other. This process of parallel trade-offs is currently not reflected in typically used sequential logit models of agent-based travel demand models. This study fills this research gap by applying discrete choice and neural network models on a synthetic population to model multiple mobility tool ownership simultaneously. Using data from a national household travel survey, both model types approximated the given target distributions of mobility tools more accurately than the sequence of three corresponding logit models. Owing to its greater flexibility, the tested shallow and deep neural network exhibited higher predictive accuracy than simultaneous discrete choice models. The results indicated that neural networks with only one hidden layer were more robust and easier to formulate and interpret than deep networks with three hidden layers. Finally, the flat neural network was applied to a different synthetic population resulting in equally accurate results.
引用
收藏
页码:376 / 390
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparing hundreds of machine learning and discrete choice models for travel demand modeling: An empirical benchmark
    Wang, Shenhao
    Mo, Baichuan
    Zheng, Yunhan
    Hess, Stephane
    Zhao, Jinhua
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2024, 190
  • [2] Machine Learning or Discrete Choice Models for Car Ownership Demand bEstimation and Prediction?
    Paredes, Miguel
    Hemberg, Erik
    O'Reilly, Una-May
    Zegras, Chris
    [J]. 2017 5TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODELS AND TECHNOLOGIES FOR INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (MT-ITS), 2017, : 780 - 785
  • [3] Enhancing Agent-Based Models with Discrete Choice Experiments
    Holm, Stefan
    Lemm, Renato
    Thees, Oliver
    Hilty, Lorenz M.
    [J]. JASSS-THE JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL SOCIETIES AND SOCIAL SIMULATION, 2016, 19 (03):
  • [4] A framework for the comparison of errors in agent-based models using machine learning
    Beerman, Jack T.
    Beaumont, Gwendal G.
    Giabbanelli, Philippe J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE, 2023, 72
  • [5] A conceptual framework for modeling the supply side of mobility services within large-scale agent-based travel demand models
    Calderon, Francisco
    Miller, Eric J.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION LETTERS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH, 2022, 14 (06): : 600 - 609
  • [6] Learning in agent-based models
    Kirman A.
    [J]. Eastern Economic Journal, 2011, 37 (1) : 20 - 27
  • [7] Measuring uncertainty in discrete choice travel demand forecasting models
    Petrik, Olga
    Moura, Filipe
    de Abreu e Silva, Joao
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 39 (02) : 218 - 237
  • [8] Advances in Agent-based Microsimulation in Travel Demand Modeling
    Auld, Joshua A.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION LETTERS-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH, 2013, 5 (04): : 165 - 166
  • [9] Just do it! Combining agent-based travel demand models with queue based-traffic flow models
    Heinrichs, Matthias
    Behrisch, Michael
    Erdmann, Jakob
    [J]. 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AMBIENT SYSTEMS, NETWORKS AND TECHNOLOGIES (ANT 2018) / THE 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (SEIT-2018) / AFFILIATED WORKSHOPS, 2018, 130 : 858 - 864
  • [10] Modeling intermodal travel behavior in an agent-based travel demand model
    Woerle, Tim
    Briem, Lars
    Heilig, Michael
    Kagerbauer, Martin
    Vortisch, Peter
    [J]. 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AMBIENT SYSTEMS, NETWORKS AND TECHNOLOGIES (ANT) / THE 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EMERGING DATA AND INDUSTRY 4.0 (EDI40) / AFFILIATED WORKSHOPS, 2021, 184 : 202 - 209