A novel method for defects marking and classifying in MFL inspection of pipeline

被引:7
|
作者
Pan, Jianhua [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gao, Lun [1 ]
机构
[1] Hefei Univ Technol, Inst Ind & Equipment Technol, Anhui Prov Key Lab Aerosp Struct Parts Forming Tec, Hefei 230009, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Special Equipment Inspect Inst, Hefei 230031, Peoples R China
[3] Hefei Univ Technol, Hefei 230009, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Magnetic flux leakage; Pipeline inner inspection; Defect marking and classification; Improved CLIQUE algorithm; Finite element simulation; SIGNALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpvp.2023.104892
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL) testing is the most widely used non-destructive technique for the inner inspection of oil and gas pipelines. Accurate quantification of defects is a long-standing difficulty in the field of pipeline leak detection. Scientific marking and classification of defects is an important prerequisite for accurate quantification. A novel method of marking and classifying defects with MFL signals is proposed, which is aiming at the problem that it is difficult to mark and classify defects accurately due to the tremendous amount of oil and gas pipeline leakage magnetic detection data. An improved CLIQUE algorithm is used to mark the defect areas of segmented pipelines to estimate the number and location of defects. Then the 3D MFL characteristic signals of the marked areas are studied and extracted. The SSA_BP neural network is trained to classify the defects. The effectiveness and accuracy of the proposed method are tested and verified by using finite element simulation defects and actual defects. The results show that the method is more efficient in marking defects and more detailed in marking areas.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MFL tool hardware for pipeline inspection
    Tandon, KK
    MATERIALS PERFORMANCE, 1997, 36 (02) : 75 - 79
  • [2] Materials characterization challenges for MFL pipeline inspection
    Lord, W
    Udpa, S
    Udpa, L
    Afzal, S
    Ivanov, P
    Yang, S
    NONDESTRUCTIVE CHARACTERIZATION OF MATERIALS IX, 1999, 497 : 189 - 195
  • [3] CHARACTERIZATION OF THE ACCURACY OF THE MFL PIPELINE INSPECTION TOOLS
    Salama, Mamdouh M.
    Nestleroth, Bruce J.
    Maes, Marc A.
    Rodriguez, Carlos
    Blumer, Dave
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 31ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING, 2012, VOL 6, 2012, : 247 - 251
  • [4] New developments in MFL-pipeline inspection technology
    Reber, K
    NDT IN PROGRESS, PROCEEDINGS: MEETING OF NDT - EXPERTS, 2001, : 209 - 220
  • [5] When is corrosion not corrosion? A decade of MFL pipeline inspection
    Tims, Paul
    Wilson, Owen
    Pipes and Pipelines International, 2002, 47 (06): : 36 - 48
  • [6] Online data compression of MFL signals for pipeline inspection
    Kathirmani, S.
    Tangirala, A. K.
    Saha, S.
    Mukhopadhyay, S.
    NDT & E INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 50 : 1 - 9
  • [7] PIPELINE INSPECTION-TOOL SPEED ALTERS MFL SIGNALS
    ATHERTON, DL
    JAGADISH, C
    LAURSEN, P
    STORM, V
    HAM, F
    SCHARFENBERGER, B
    OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 1990, 88 (05) : 84 - 86
  • [8] An ELM-based Classifier about MFL Inspection of Pipeline
    Liu, Jinhai
    Fu, Mingrui
    Wu, Zhenning
    Su, Hanguang
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 28TH CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE (2016 CCDC), 2016, : 1952 - 1955
  • [9] Intelligent monitoring approach for pipeline defect detection from MFL inspection
    Ehteram S.
    Moussavi S.Z.
    Sadeghi M.
    Mahdavi S.M.
    Kazemi A.
    Journal of Convergence Information Technology, 2010, 5 (02) : 43 - 49
  • [10] Temperature Error Compensation New Method of MFL Sensor to Oil-gas Pipeline Corrosion Inspection
    Ma, Zhongli
    Liu, Hongda
    ADVANCED RESEARCH ON INDUSTRY, INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND MATERIAL ENGINEERING, PTS 1-7, 2011, 204-210 : 1026 - 1030