COVID-19 personal protective equipment (PPE) contamination in coastal areas of Granada, Spain

被引:6
|
作者
Ortega, F. [1 ]
Calero, M. [1 ]
Rico, N. [2 ]
Martin-Lara, M. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Fac Sci, Chem Engn Dept, Granada, Spain
[2] Univ Granada, Fac Sci, Dept Stat & Operat Res, Granada, Spain
关键词
Plastic pollution; Beaches; COVID-19; Personal protective equipment (PPE); Granada;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.114908
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The use of disposable personal protective equipment (PPE) as a control measure to avoid transmission against COVID-19 has generated a challenge to the waste management and enhances plastic pollution in the environment. The research aims to monitor the presence of PPE waste and other plastic debris, in a time interval where the use of face mask at specific places was still mandatory, on the coastal areas of Granada (Spain) which belongs to the Mediterranean Sea. Four beaches called La Rijana, La Charca, La R ' abita and Calahonda were examined during different periods. The total amount of sampled waste was 17,558 plastic units. The abundance, characteristics and distribution of PPE and other plastic debris were determined. Results showed that the observed amount of total plastic debris were between 2.531.10-2 and 24.487.10-2 units per square meter, and up to 0.136.10-2 for PPE debris, where face masks represented the 92.22 % of the total PPE debris, being these results comparable to previous studies in other coastal areas in the world. On the other hand, total plastic debris densities were in the range from 2.457.10-2 to 92.219.10-2 g/m2 and densities were up to 0.732.10-2 for PPE debris. PPE debris supposed 0.79 % of the weight of total waste and the 0.51 % of total items. Concerning nonPPE plastic waste: cigarettes filters, food containers and styrofoam were the most abundant items (42.95, 10.19 and 16.37 % of total items, respectively). During vacation periods, total plastic debris amount increased 92.19 % compared to non-vacation periods. Regarding type of beaches, the presence of plastic debris was significantly higher on touristic/recreational than in fishing beaches. Data showed no significant differences between accessible and no-accessible beaches, but between periods with restrictive policy about mask face use and periods with non-restrictive policy data suggest significant differences between densities (g/m2) for PPE litter. The amount of PPEs debris is also correlated with the number of cigarettes filters (Person's r = 0.650), food containers (r = 0.782) and other debris (r = 0.63). Finally, although interesting results were provided in this study, further research is required to better understand the consequences of this type of pollution and to provide viable solutions to this problem.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] COVID-19 black swan and personal protective equipment (PPE) in Pakistan
    Ahmad, Akhlaq
    Shoaib, Muhammad
    Abdullah, Farooq
    HEALTH EDUCATION, 2022, 122 (04) : 365 - 373
  • [2] Personal protective equipment (PPE) for vitreoretinal surgery during COVID-19
    Aman Chandra
    Richard Haynes
    Michael Burdon
    Alistair Laidlaw
    James Neffendorf
    Ian Eames
    Lyndon daCruz
    Richard W. Lee
    Stephen Charles
    Peter Wilson
    Andrew Dick
    Declan Flanagan
    David Yorston
    Melanie Hingorani
    Louisa Wickham
    Eye, 2020, 34 : 1196 - 1199
  • [3] Tracheostomy and personal protective equipment (PPE) in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic
    Faris, Callum
    Deben, Kristof
    Van Haesendonck, Gilles
    Van Laer, Carl
    Puxeddu, Roberto
    Verbruggen, Katia
    Marien, Steven
    Gordts, Frans
    Mani, Navin
    Vanderveken, Olivier M.
    B-ENT, 2020, 16 (01) : 63 - 72
  • [4] Combating the COVID-19 battle with personal protective equipment (PPE) armamentarium
    Bajwa, Sukhminder Jit Singh
    Kurdi, Madhuri
    Malhotra, Naveen
    JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 36 : S133 - +
  • [5] Rationalizing personal protective equipment (PPE) in radiology in the time of COVID-19
    Sureka, Binit
    Garg, Pawan Kumar
    Khera, Pushpinder Singh
    Sinha, Arvind
    Misra, Sanjeev
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND IMAGING, 2021, 31 (05): : S204 - S206
  • [6] Personal protective equipment (PPE) for vitreoretinal surgery during COVID-19
    Chandra, Aman
    Haynes, Richard
    Burdon, Michael
    Laidlaw, Alistair
    Neffendorf, James
    Eames, Ian
    daCruz, Lyndon
    Lee, Richard W.
    Charles, Stephen
    Wilson, Peter
    Dick, Andrew
    Flanagan, Declan
    Yorston, David
    Hingorani, Melanie
    Wickham, Louisa
    EYE, 2020, 34 (07) : 1196 - 1199
  • [7] Effect of Wearing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for COVID-19 Treatment on Blood Culture Contamination: Implication for Optimal PPE Strategies
    Park, Jae Hyeon
    Kim, Taek Soo
    Lee, Chan Mi
    Kang, Chang Kyung
    Park, Wan Beom
    Kim, Nam Joong
    Choe, Pyoeng Gyun
    Oh, Myoung-don
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 38 (23)
  • [8] Contamination of personal protective equipment during COVID-19 autopsies
    Brandner, Johanna M.
    Boor, Peter
    Borcherding, Lukas
    Edler, Carolin
    Gerber, Sven
    Heinemann, Axel
    Hilsenbeck, Julia
    Kasajima, Atsuko
    Lohner, Larissa
    Maerkl, Bruno
    Pablik, Jessica
    Schroeder, Ann Sophie
    Slotta-Huspenina, Julia
    Sommer, Linna
    Sperhake, Jan-Peter
    von Stillfried, Saskia
    Dintner, Sebastian
    VIRCHOWS ARCHIV, 2022, 480 (03) : 519 - 528
  • [9] Contamination of personal protective equipment during COVID-19 autopsies
    Johanna M. Brandner
    Peter Boor
    Lukas Borcherding
    Carolin Edler
    Sven Gerber
    Axel Heinemann
    Julia Hilsenbeck
    Atsuko Kasajima
    Larissa Lohner
    Bruno Märkl
    Jessica Pablik
    Ann Sophie Schröder
    Julia Slotta-Huspenina
    Linna Sommer
    Jan-Peter Sperhake
    Saskia von Stillfried
    Sebastian Dintner
    Virchows Archiv, 2022, 480 : 519 - 528
  • [10] COVID-19: Implications for plastic reduction, with a focus on Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
    da Costa, Joao Pinto
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ADVANCES, 2021, 4