Implementing cancer symptom management interventions utilizing patient-reported outcomes: a pre-implementation evaluation of barriers and facilitators

被引:0
|
作者
Minteer, Sarah A. [1 ]
Cheville, Andrea [2 ]
Tesch, Nathan [1 ]
Griffin, Joan M. [1 ,3 ]
Austin, Jessica D. [4 ]
Mitchell, Sandra [5 ]
Leppin, Aaron L. [1 ,3 ]
Ridgeway, Jennifer L. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Robert D & Patricia E Kern Ctr Sci Hlth Care Deliv, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Rochester, MN USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Div Hlth Care Delivery Res, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Mayo Clin Arizona, Dept Quantitat Hlth Sci, Div Epidemiol, Scottsdale, AZ USA
[5] NCI, Healthcare Delivery Res Program, Bethesda, MD USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Cancer; Symptom management; ePROMS; Pre-implementation evaluation; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1007/s00520-023-08114-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PurposeSymptoms can negatively impact quality of life for patients with a history of cancer. Digital, electronic health record (EHR)-integrated approaches to routine symptom monitoring accompanied by evidence-based interventions for symptom management have been explored as a scalable way to improve symptom management, particularly between clinic visits. However, little research has evaluated barriers and facilitators to implementing these approaches in real-world settings, particularly during the pre-implementation phase. Pre-implementation assessment is critical for informing the selection and sequencing of implementation strategies and intervention adaptation. Thus, this study sought to understand pre-implementation perceptions of a remote cancer symptom monitoring and management intervention that uses electronic patient-reported outcome measures for symptom assessment.MethodsWe interviewed 20 clinical and administrative stakeholders from 4 geographic regions within an academic medical center and its affiliated health system during the months prior to initiation of a stepped-wedge, cluster randomized pragmatic trial. Transcripts were coded using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research [CFIR] 2.0. Two study team members reviewed coded transcripts to understand how determinants were relevant in the pre-implementation phase of the trial and prepared analytic memos to identify themes.ResultsFindings are summarized in four themes: (1) ability of the intervention to meet patient needs [recipient characteristics], (2) designing with care team needs in mind [innovation design and adaptability], (3) fit of the intervention with existing practice workflows [compatibility], and (4) engaging care teams early [engaging deliverers].ConclusionAttention to these aspects when planning intervention protocols can promote intervention compatibility with patients, providers, and practices thereby increasing implementation success.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Implementing cancer symptom management interventions utilizing patient-reported outcomes: a pre-implementation evaluation of barriers and facilitators
    Sarah A. Minteer
    Andrea Cheville
    Nathan Tesch
    Joan M. Griffin
    Jessica D. Austin
    Sandra Mitchell
    Aaron L. Leppin
    Jennifer L. Ridgeway
    [J]. Supportive Care in Cancer, 2023, 31
  • [2] Facilitators and Barriers in the Implementation and Adoption of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurements in Daily Practice
    Huberts, Anouk S.
    Koppert, Linetta B.
    Benschop, Joica A. M.
    Meerstra, Jelle W.
    van't Spijker, Adriaan
    van Lint, Celine
    Kamminga, Nadia C. W.
    den Hollander, Monique S.
    Peters, Ingrid A.
    van der Woude, Christien J.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2024, 27 (09) : 1235 - 1242
  • [3] Understanding the barriers and facilitators to implementing patient-reported outcome measures in surgery
    Gibbons, Chris
    Tsengaris, Elena
    Dominici, Laura
    Pusic, Andrea
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2018, 27 : S92 - S93
  • [4] Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Patient-Reported Outcome Monitoring in Gastrointestinal Surgery
    Iroz, Cassandra B.
    Johnson, Julie K.
    Ager, Meagan S.
    Joung, Rachel Hae-Soo
    Brajcich, Brian C.
    Cella, David
    Franklin, Patricia D.
    Holl, Jane L.
    Bilimoria, Karl Y.
    Merkow, Ryan P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2023, 288 : 341 - 349
  • [5] Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome System at Cancer Hospitals in Japan
    Uneno, Yu
    Fukuyama, Keita
    Nishimura, Ayumi
    Eguchi, Kana
    Kojima, Hideki
    Umino, Takeshi
    Miyazaki, Kikuko
    Negora, Eiju
    Minashi, Keiko
    Sugiyama, Osamu
    Shimazu, Taichi
    Muto, Manabu
    Matsumoto, Shigemi
    [J]. CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [6] Patient-level barriers and facilitators to completion of patient-reported outcomes measures
    Long, Chao
    Beres, Laura K.
    Wu, Albert W.
    Giladi, Aviram M.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2022, 31 (06) : 1711 - 1718
  • [7] Patient-level barriers and facilitators to completion of patient-reported outcomes measures
    Chao Long
    Laura K. Beres
    Albert W. Wu
    Aviram M. Giladi
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2022, 31 : 1711 - 1718
  • [8] Patient-reported Outcomes of Acupuncture for Symptom Control in Cancer
    Thompson, Lora M. A.
    Osian, Sarah Rausch
    Jacobsen, Paul B.
    Johnstone, Peter A. S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ACUPUNCTURE AND MERIDIAN STUDIES, 2015, 8 (03) : 127 - 133
  • [9] Tenets for Implementing Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes for Remote Symptom Monitoring During Cancer Treatment
    Basch, Ethan
    Rocque, Gabrielle
    Mody, Gita
    Mullangi, Samyukta
    Patt, Debra
    [J]. JCO CLINICAL CANCER INFORMATICS, 2023, 7
  • [10] Tenets for Implementing Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes for Remote Symptom Monitoring During Cancer Treatment
    Basch, Ethan
    Rocque, Gabrielle
    Mody, Gita
    Mullangi, Samyukta
    Patt, Debra
    [J]. JCO CLINICAL CANCER INFORMATICS, 2023, 7 : e2200187