Inequalities in privacy cynicism: An intersectional analysis of agency constraints

被引:4
|
作者
Hoffmann, Christian Pieter [1 ]
Lutz, Christoph [2 ]
Ranzini, Giulia [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leipzig, Inst Commun & Media Studies, Leipzig, Germany
[2] BI Norwegian Business Sch, Nord Ctr Internet & Soc, Dept Commun & Culture, Oslo, Norway
[3] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Network Inst, Fac Social Sci Commun Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Privacy; privacy cynicism; intersectionality; agency; surveillance; SOCIAL MEDIA; MOBILE MEDIA; ONLINE; SURVEILLANCE; CALCULUS; SELF; ECONOMICS; ADOPTION; CONTEXT; GENDER;
D O I
10.1177/20539517241232629
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
A growing body of research highlights a trend toward widespread attitudes of privacy cynicism, apathy and resignation among Internet users. In this work, we extend these discussions by concentrating on the concept of user agency. Specifically, we examine how five types of structural constraints-interpersonal, cultural, technological, economic and political-restrict user agency and contribute to the prevalence of privacy cynicism as a common response. Drawing on critical data studies and adopting an intersectional lens, we demonstrate how these constraints disproportionately impact various social groups unequally, leading to a disparate distribution of agency and privacy cynicism. Furthermore, we contend that the sense of powerlessness engendered by excessive constraints on user agency can, in turn, exacerbate user vulnerability to such constraints, potentially initiating a vicious cycle of disempowerment. The article enriches the field of privacy research by linking the traditionally individual-focused and psychological dimensions of privacy with critical surveillance studies and by proposing potential interventions to mitigate privacy cynicism.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intersectional Inequalities and Individual Heterogeneity in Chronic Rheumatic Diseases: An Intersectional Multilevel Analysis
    Kiadaliri, Ali
    Englund, Martin
    [J]. ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2021, 73 (02) : 296 - 304
  • [2] Privacy cynicism: A new approach to the privacy paradox
    Hoffmann, Christian Pieter
    Lutz, Christoph
    Ranzini, Giulia
    [J]. CYBERPSYCHOLOGY-JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOCIAL RESEARCH ON CYBERSPACE, 2016, 10 (04):
  • [3] Intersectional inequalities in science
    Kozlowski, Diego
    Lariviere, Vincent
    Sugimoto, Cassidy R.
    Monroe-White, Thema
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2022, 119 (02)
  • [4] Agency and Ontology within Intersectional Analysis: A Critical Realist Contribution
    Clegg, Sue
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL REALISM, 2016, 15 (05) : 494 - 510
  • [5] Privacy Cynicism and its Role in Privacy Decision-Making
    van Ooijen, Iris
    Segijn, Claire M.
    Opree, Suzanna J.
    [J]. COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2024, 51 (02) : 146 - 177
  • [6] Impact of COVID-19 inequalities on children: An intersectional analysis
    Lemkow-Tovias, Gabriel
    Lemkow, Louis
    Cash-Gibson, Lucinda
    Teixido-Compano, Ester
    Benach, Joan
    [J]. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS, 2023, 45 (01) : 145 - 162
  • [7] Placing intersectional inequalities in health
    Bambra, Clare
    [J]. HEALTH & PLACE, 2022, 75
  • [8] Cynicism as strength: Privacy cynicism, satisfaction and trust among social media users
    Khan, Md Irfanuzzaman
    Loh, Jennifer
    Hossain, Afsana
    Talukder, Md Jakir Hasan
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2023, 142
  • [9] Webs of oppression: An intersectional analysis of inequalities facing women activists in Palestine
    Nazzal, Amal
    Stringfellow, Lindsay
    Maclean, Mairi
    [J]. HUMAN RELATIONS, 2024, 77 (02) : 265 - 295
  • [10] Protection or Cynicism? Dual Strategies for Coping with Privacy Threats
    Yu, Lu
    He, Li
    Du, Jian
    Wu, Xiaobo
    [J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS FRONTIERS, 2024,