Head-to-head comparison between [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-NOC and [18F]DOPA PET/CT in a diverse cohort of patients with pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas

被引:2
|
作者
He, Qiao [1 ]
Zhang, Zhengkun [2 ]
Zhang, Linqi [3 ]
Zhang, Bing [1 ]
Long, Yali [1 ]
Zhang, Yuying [1 ]
Liao, Zhihong [4 ]
Zha, Zhihao [1 ]
Zhang, Xiangsong [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Nucl Med, 58 Zhongshan Er Rd, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Urol, 58 Zhongshan Er Rd, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Guangzhou Med Univ, Dept Nucl Med, Affiliated Canc Hosp & Inst, 78 Hengzhigang Rd, Guangzhou 510095, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Endocrinol, 58 Zhongshan Er Rd, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Pheochromocytoma; Paraganglioma; Ga-68]Ga-DOTA-NOC; F-18]DOPA; PET/CT; FUNCTIONAL IMAGING MODALITIES; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; GA-68-DOTATOC PET/CT; F-18-DOPA PET/CT; METASTATIC PHEOCHROMOCYTOMA; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; F-18-FDOPA PET; FOLLOW-UP; LOCALIZATION; METAIODOBENZYLGUANIDINE;
D O I
10.1007/s00259-024-06622-z
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To compare the detection ability of Ga-68-labelled DOTA-l-Nal3-octreotide ([Ga-68]Ga-DOTA-NOC) and 6-[F-18]fluoro-L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine ([F-18]DOPA) in patients with phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) of different origins and gene mutations, such as germline succinate dehydrogenase complex genes (SDHx). Methods Eighty-five patients with histopathologically confirmed PPGLs who underwent both [Ga-68]Ga-DOTA-NOC and [F-18]DOPA PET/CT from March 2017 to June 2023 were enrolled in this retrospective study. For comparative analyses, PPGLs were classified as phaeochromocytoma (PCC), sympathetic paraganglioma (sPGL), and head/neck paraganglioma (HNPGL). Detection rates were analyzed on per-patient and per-lesion bases and compared using the Chi-square/Fischer's exact test. Results Among 85 patients with PPGLs (48 males; 43 years +/- 17 [SD]), the patient-based detection rates of [Ga-68]Ga-DOTA-NOC and [F-18]DOPA PET/CT were 87.1% (74/85) and 89.4% (76/85), respectively (p = 0.634), and the lesion-based detection rates were 80.8% (479/593) and 71.2% (422/593), respectively (p < 0.001). Only one patient with a recurrent PCC presented double-negative imaging, while 66 patients exhibited double-positive imaging. The remaining patients were either [Ga-68]Ga-DOTA-NOC-negative/[F-18]DOPA-positive (n = 10) or [Ga-68]Ga-DOTA-NOC-positive/[F-18]DOPA-negative (n = 8). In subgroup analyses, [Ga-68]Ga-DOTA-NOC PET/CT detected significantly more metastases of sPGL (91.1%, 236/259) and SDHx-related PPGL (89.6%, 86/96) than [F-18]DOPA PET/CT (48.6%[126/259] and 50.0%[48/96], respectively; both p < 0.001). However, [F-18]DOPA showed significantly higher detection rates of PCC in both primary/recurrent and metastatic lesions (94.3%[50/53] vs. 62.3%[33/53] and 87.9%[174/198] vs. 69.2%[137/198], respectively; both p < 0.001). Regarding metastases in different organs, [Ga-68]Ga-DOTA-NOC PET/CT detected more lesions than [F-18]DOPA PET/CT in bone (96.2%[176/183] vs. 66.1%[121/183]; p < 0.001) and lymph nodes (82.0%[73/89] vs. 53.9%[48/89]; p < 0.001) but less lesions in peritoneum (20%[4/20] vs. 100%[20/20]; p < 0.001). Conclusion [Ga-68]Ga-DOTA-NOC and [F-18]DOPA are complementary in diagnosing PPGL under the appropriate clinical setting. [Ga-68]Ga-DOTA-NOC should be considered as the ideal first-line tracer for detecting metastases of sPGL and SDHx-related tumours, whereas [F-18]DOPA may be the optimal tracer for evaluating non-SDHx-related PCC, especially in detecting primary lesions and monitoring recurrence.
引用
收藏
页码:1989 / 2001
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Head-to-head comparison of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi with [18F]F-FDG PET/CT in patients with breast cancer
    Yadav, Madhav
    Ballal, Sanjana
    Roesch, Frank
    Martin, Marcel
    Moon, Euy Sung
    Raju, Shobhana
    Sheokand, Parvind
    Wakade, Nicky
    Tripathi, Madhavi
    Bal, Chandrasekhar
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2023, 64
  • [2] A head-to-head comparison of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FGFR1 and [18F]FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of lung cancer
    Yuan, Huiqing
    Chen, Xiaoshan
    Zhao, Xinming
    Dai, Meng
    Liu, Yunuan
    Han, Jingya
    Jing, Fenglian
    Chen, Xiaolin
    Pang, Xiao
    Zhang, Zhaoqi
    Zhang, Jingmian
    Wang, Jianfang
    Wang, Mengjiao
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2025, 52 (03) : 979 - 992
  • [3] Head-to-Head Comparison between [68Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi and [18F]F-FDG PET/CT Imaging in Patients with Breast Cancer
    Ballal, Sanjana
    Yadav, Madhav P.
    Roesch, Frank
    Wakade, Nicky
    Raju, Shobhana
    Sheokand, Parvind
    Mishra, Prashant
    Moon, Euy Sung
    Tripathi, Madhavi
    Martin, Marcel
    Bal, Chandrasekhar
    PHARMACEUTICALS, 2023, 16 (04)
  • [4] Comparison 2-[18F] FDG and [68Ga] Ga-DOTA-NOC PET/CT in re-staging of patients with Esthesioneuroblastoma
    Torres, L.
    Garcia Perez, F. O.
    Ignacio Alvarez, E.
    Sinisterra Solis, F. A.
    Arguelles Perez, D. A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2021, 48 (SUPPL 1) : S238 - S238
  • [5] Head-to-head assessment of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-FAPI-04 PET/CT vs [18F]FDG PET/CT in fibroblastic tumors
    Zhang, Annan
    Meng, Xiangxi
    Yao, Yuan
    Zhou, Xin
    Zhang, Yan
    Li, Nan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 155
  • [6] Head-to-head comparison of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [18F]FDG PET/CT in multiple myeloma
    Souza, Stephan P. M.
    Frasson, Fernanda C.
    Takahashi, Maria Emilia S.
    Duarte, Gislaine B. O.
    Castro, Vania P.
    Pericole, Fernando V.
    Velloso, Licio A.
    De Souza, Carmino A.
    Lorand-Metze, Irene
    Santos, Allan O.
    Ramos, Celso D.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2023, 50 (08) : 2432 - 2440
  • [7] Head-to-head comparison of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 and [18F]FDG PET/CT in multiple myeloma
    Stephan P. M. Souza
    Fernanda C. Frasson
    Maria Emilia S. Takahashi
    Gislaine B. O. Duarte
    Vania P. Castro
    Fernando V. Pericole
    Licio A. Velloso
    Carmino A. De Souza
    Irene Lorand-Metze
    Allan O. Santos
    Celso D. Ramos
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2023, 50 : 2432 - 2440
  • [8] Biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, dosimetry of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi, and the head-to-head comparison with [18F]F-FDG PET/CT in patients with various cancers
    Sanjana Ballal
    Madhav Prasad Yadav
    Euy Sung Moon
    Vasko S. Kramer
    Frank Roesch
    Samta Kumari
    Madhavi Tripathi
    Sreedharan Thankarajan ArunRaj
    Sulochana Sarswat
    Chandrasekhar Bal
    European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 2021, 48 : 1915 - 1931
  • [9] Biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, dosimetry of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA.SA.FAPi, and the head-to-head comparison with [18F]F-FDG PET/CT in patients with various cancers
    Ballal, Sanjana
    Yadav, Madhav Prasad
    Moon, Euy Sung
    Kramer, Vasko S.
    Roesch, Frank
    Kumari, Samta
    Tripathi, Madhavi
    ArunRaj, Sreedharan Thankarajan
    Sarswat, Sulochana
    Bal, Chandrasekhar
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2021, 48 (06) : 1915 - 1931
  • [10] Head-to-head evaluation of [18F]FDG PET/CT and [68Ga]Ga-HX01 PET/MR in sarcoma patients
    Zhang, Xiao
    Gai, Yongkang
    Ye, Ting
    Fan, Li
    Xiu, Linfeng
    Ruan, Weiwei
    Hu, Fan
    Chen, Jing
    Lan, Xiaoli
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2025,