Accuracy of freehand versus guided immediate implant placement: A randomized controlled trial

被引:8
|
作者
Chandran, K. R. Segin [1 ]
Goyal, Manoj [1 ]
Mittal, Neeti [1 ]
George, Jensy Sara [2 ]
机构
[1] Santosh Univ, 1 Santosh Nagar, Ghaziabad 201009, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Tamil Nadu Dr MGR Med Univ, 69 Anna Salai, Chennai 600032, Tamil Nadu, India
来源
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY | 2023年 / 136卷
关键词
Immediate implant placement; Post-extraction socket; Guided surgery; Freehand surgery; Accuracy; TAPER CONNECTION IMPLANTS; FRESH EXTRACTION SOCKETS; IN-VITRO; ANTERIOR MAXILLA; HEALED SITES; STABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104620
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: This randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to compare the accuracy of immediate implant placement with freehand and static guided surgery. Methods: An RCT was conducted on 61 subjects who received a total of 80 dental implants. The enrolled patients were randomly allocated to two groups: freehand surgery (control group, n = 40 implants) and static guided surgery with R2Gate (R) (Megagen, Gyeongbuk, South Korea, test group, n = 40 implants). Crestal and apical deviations in both mesiodistal and buccolingual dimensions, as well as depth and angular deviations, were calculated by comparing the three-dimensional (3D) position of the implant in the planning software with the final implant position, revealed by an intraoral scan of the fixture after placement. The Mann-Whitney test was used for comparative assessment. Results: In the freehand group (control), crestal deviations of 1.13 +/- 0.89 mm and 1.00 +/- 0.76 mm were found in the mesiodistal and buccolingual directions, respectively, versus 0.34 +/- 0.26 mm (p<0.001) and 0.37 +/- 0.24 mm (p = 0.03) in the static guided surgery group (test). Apical deviation was also higher in the freehand group (control) than in the static guided surgery group (test) in the mesiodistal (4.04 +/- 1.90 mm vs. 0.97 +/- 0.55 mm, p = 0.04) and buccolingual directions (3.46 +/- 1.82 mm vs. 0.94 +/- 0.67 mm, p = 0.02). Freehand surgery had greater angular deviation (6.09. +/- 3.23) compared to guided surgery (0.83. +/- 0.53, p = 0.02). However, depth deviation was similar in the freehand surgery group (2.24 +/- 1.58 mm) and static guided surgery group (0.66 +/- 0.43, p = 0.09). Conclusions: Immediate implant placement with static guided surgery demonstrated better accuracy than free-hand surgery. Statement of clinical relevance: Guided implant surgery showed fewer deviations compared to freehand surgery in fresh extraction sockets; therefore, the use of static guides should be given preference over the freehand modality.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Freehand Versus Guided Surgery: Factors Influencing Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement
    Choi, William
    Nguyen, Bao-Chau
    Doan, Andrew
    Girod, Sabine
    Gaudilliere, Brice
    Gaudilliere, Dyani
    [J]. IMPLANT DENTISTRY, 2017, 26 (04) : 500 - 509
  • [2] Guided versus freehand single implant placement: A 3-year parallel randomized clinical trial
    Lops, Diego
    Palazzolo, Antonino
    Calza, Stefano
    Proietto, Luca
    Sordillo, Annamaria
    Mensi, Magda
    Romeo, Eugenio
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 149
  • [3] Fully versus conventionally guided implant placement by dental students: A randomized controlled trial
    Sondergaard, Kasper
    Hosseini, Mandana
    Storgard Jensen, Simon
    Spin-Neto, Rubens
    Gotfredsen, Klaus
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2021, 32 (09) : 1072 - 1084
  • [4] A retrospective study of the accuracy of template-guided versus freehand implant placement: A nonradiologic method
    Alevizakos, Vasilios
    Mitov, Gergo
    Stoetzer, Marcus
    von See, Constantin
    [J]. ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY, 2019, 128 (03): : 220 - 226
  • [5] Accuracy of dental implant placement via dynamic navigation or the freehand method: A split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial
    Aydemir, Ceyda Aktolun
    Arisan, Volkan
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2020, 31 (03) : 255 - 263
  • [6] Guidance means accuracy: A randomized clinical trial on freehand versus guided dental implantation
    Varga, Endre, Jr.
    Antal, Mark
    Major, Laszlo
    Kiscsatari, Ramona
    Braunitzer, Gabor
    Piffko, Jozsef
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2020, 31 (05) : 417 - 430
  • [7] Does machine-vision-assisted dynamic navigation improve the accuracy of digitally planned prosthetically guided immediate implant placement? A randomized controlled trial
    Wei, Shi-Min
    Li, Yuan
    Deng, Ke
    Lai, Hong-Chang
    Tonetti, Maurizio S.
    Shi, Jun-Yu
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2022, 33 (08) : 804 - 815
  • [8] Immediate implant placement influenced by musical flow: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial
    Pellicer, Lorenzo Esteban
    Rubio, Jose Luis Martinez
    Casanas, Elisabeth
    Villar, Antonio Conde
    [J]. BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [9] Immediate versus delayed implant placement after anterior single tooth extraction: the timing randomized controlled clinical trial
    Tonetti, Maurizio S.
    Cortellini, Pierpaolo
    Graziani, Filippo
    Cairo, Francesco
    Lang, Niklaus P.
    Abundo, Roberto
    Conforti, Gian Paolo
    Marquardt, Siegfried
    Rasperini, Giulio
    Silvestri, Maurizio
    Wallkamm, Beat
    Wetzel, Anton
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2017, 44 (02) : 215 - 224
  • [10] Guided (VENTRI-GUIDE) versus freehand ventriculostomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Sarrafzadeh, Asita
    Smoll, Nicolas
    Schaller, Karl
    [J]. TRIALS, 2014, 15