Endoscopic scoring system utilization for inflammatory bowel disease activity assessment: A multicenter real-world study from Argentina

Background: The frequency and patterns of use of scores for the assessment of endoscopic activity in inflammatory bowel disease patients are not known. Aim: To describe the prevalence of adequate use of endoscopic scores in IBD patients who underwent colonoscopy in a real-life setting. Materials and methods: A multicenter observational study comprising six community hospitals in Argentina was undertaken. Patients with a diagnosis of Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis who underwent colonoscopy for endoscopic activity assessment between 2018 and 2022 were included. Colonoscopy reports of included subjects were manually reviewed to determine the proportion of colonoscopies that included an endoscopic score report. We determined the pro- portion of colonoscopy reports that included all of the IBD colonoscopy report quality elements proposed by BRIDGe group. Endoscopist's specialty, years of experience as well as expertise in IBD were assessed. Results: A total of 1556 patients were included for analysis (31.94% patients with Crohn's disease). Mean age was 45.94 +/- 15.46. Endoscopic score reporting was found in 58.41% of colono- scopies. Most frequently used scores were Mayo endoscopic score (90.56%) , SES-CD (56.03%) for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, respectively. In addition, 79.11% of endoscopic reports failed to comply with all recommendations on endoscopic reporting for inflammatory bowel disease. Conclusions: A significant proportion of endoscopic reports of inflammatory bowel disease patients do not include the description of an endoscopic score to assess mucosal inflammatory activity in a real -world setting. This is also associated with a lack of compliance in recommended criteria for proper endoscopic reporting. (c) 2023 Elsevier Espana, S.L.U. All rights reserved.