Perspectives of Biogas Plants as BECCS Facilities: A Comparative Analysis of Biomethane vs. Biohydrogen Production with Carbon Capture and Storage or Use (CCS/CCU)

被引:5
|
作者
Full, Johannes [1 ,2 ]
Hohmann, Silja [1 ,2 ]
Ziehn, Sonja [1 ]
Gamero, Edgar [1 ,2 ]
Schliess, Tobias [1 ]
Schmid, Hans-Peter [3 ]
Miehe, Robert [1 ,4 ]
Sauer, Alexander [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fraunhofer Inst Mfg Engn & Automat IPA, Nobelstr 12, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
[2] Univ Stuttgart, Inst Energy Efficiency Prod EEP, Nobelstr 12, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
[3] WS Reformer GmbH, Allmandring 35,Dornierstr 14, D-71272 Renningen, Germany
[4] Univ Stuttgart, Inst Ind Mfg & Management IFF, Allmandring 35, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
HyBECCS; hydrogen; BECCS; biogas; biohydrogen; biomethane; CDR; NET; carbon-negative hydrogen; steam methane reforming; SMR; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; NATURAL-GAS; METHANE; FUEL; PURIFICATION; STATE;
D O I
10.3390/en16135066
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The transition to a carbon-neutral economy requires innovative solutions that reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) and promote sustainable energy production. Additionally, carbon dioxide removal technologies are urgently needed. The production of biomethane or biohydrogen with carbon dioxide capture and storage are two promising BECCS approaches to achieve these goals. In this study, we compare the advantages and disadvantages of these two approaches regarding their technical, economic, and environmental performance. Our analysis shows that while both approaches have the potential to reduce GHG emissions and increase energy security, the hydrogen-production approach has several advantages, including up to five times higher carbon dioxide removal potential. However, the hydrogen bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (HyBECCS) approach also faces some challenges, such as higher capital costs, the need for additional infrastructure, and lower energy efficiency. Our results give valuable insights into the trade-offs between these two approaches. They can inform decision-makers regarding the most suitable method for reducing GHG emissions and provide renewable energy in different settings.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 2 条
  • [1] Analysis of power production and emission reduction through the use of biogas and carbon capture and storage
    Clark, Ryan
    Budinis, Sara
    Hawkes, Adam
    McMartin, Dena
    27TH EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, PT C, 2017, 40C : 2635 - 2640
  • [2] Combustion vs. gasification for a demonstration CCS (carbon capture and storage) project in Italy: A techno-economic analysis
    Pettinau, Alberto
    Ferrara, Francesca
    Amorino, Carlo
    ENERGY, 2013, 50 : 160 - 169