Projecting Robot Intentions Through Visual Cues: Static vs. Dynamic Signaling

被引:1
|
作者
Sonawani, Shubham [1 ]
Zhou, Yifan [1 ]
Ben Amor, Heni [1 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Sch Comp & Augmented Intelligence, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
来源
2023 IEEE/RSJ INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT ROBOTS AND SYSTEMS (IROS) | 2023年
关键词
MIXED-REALITY;
D O I
10.1109/IROS55552.2023.10342222
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Augmented and mixed-reality techniques harbor a great potential for improving human-robot collaboration. Visual signals and cues may be projected to a human partner in order to explicitly communicate robot intentions and goals. However, it is unclear what type of signals support such a process and whether signals can be combined without adding additional cognitive stress to the partner. This paper focuses on identifying the effective types of visual signals and quantify their impact through empirical evaluations. In particular, the study compares static and dynamic visual signals within a collaborative object sorting task and assesses their ability to shape human behavior. Furthermore, an information-theoretic analysis is performed to numerically quantify the degree of information transfer between visual signals and human behavior. The results of a human subject experiment show that there are significant advantages to combining multiple visual signals within a single task, i.e., increased task efficiency and reduced cognitive load.
引用
收藏
页码:7931 / 7938
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Locomotion of a Biped Robot: Static vs. Dynamic Gaits
    Lim, Seungchul
    Ko, Inhwan
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE KOREAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS A, 2006, 30 (06) : 643 - 652
  • [2] DYNAMIC vs. STATIC PHONETICS
    Barker, James L.
    JOURNAL OF SPEECH DISORDERS, 1940, 5 (02): : 153 - 183
  • [3] Visual perception of vowels from static and dynamic cues
    Rojczyk, Arkadiusz
    Ciszewski, Tomasz
    Szwoch, Grzegorz
    Czyzewski, Andrzej
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2018, 143 (05): : EL328 - EL332
  • [4] Better Teaming Through Visual Cues How Projecting Imagery in a Workspace Can Improve Human-Robot Collaboration
    Ganesan, Ramsundar Kalpagam
    Rathore, Yash K.
    Ross, Heather M.
    Ben Amor, Heni
    IEEE ROBOTICS & AUTOMATION MAGAZINE, 2018, 25 (02) : 59 - 71
  • [5] The static welfare claimant vs. the dynamic migrant
    Daly, John Scott
    JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE AND POLITICS, 2024,
  • [6] Dynamic vs. Static Recognition of Facial Expressions
    Raducanu, Bogdan
    Dornaika, Fadi
    AMBIENT INTELLIGENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5355 : 13 - +
  • [7] Static vs. Dynamic Validation of BSP Conformance
    Prennschuetz-Schuetzenau, Stefan
    Mukhi, Nirmal K.
    Hada, Satoshi
    Sato, Naoto
    Satoh, Fumiko
    Uramoto, Naohiko
    2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEB SERVICES, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2009, : 919 - +
  • [8] Image emotional classification: Static vs. dynamic
    Wang, WN
    Yu, YL
    Zhang, JC
    2004 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN & CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-7, 2004, : 6407 - 6411
  • [9] Encoding contact size using static and dynamic electrotactile finger stimulation: natural decoding vs. trained cues
    Henrich, Mauricio Carlos
    Garenfeld, Martin A.
    Malesevic, Jovana
    Strbac, Matija
    Dosen, Strahinja
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2024, 242 (05) : 1047 - 1060
  • [10] Encoding contact size using static and dynamic electrotactile finger stimulation: natural decoding vs. trained cues
    Mauricio Carlos Henrich
    Martin A. Garenfeld
    Jovana Malesevic
    Matija Strbac
    Strahinja Dosen
    Experimental Brain Research, 2024, 242 : 1047 - 1060