Complete mesocolic excision for right hemicolectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:7
|
作者
De Lange, G. [1 ]
Davies, J. [3 ,4 ]
Toso, C. [1 ,2 ]
Meurette, G. [1 ,2 ]
Ris, F. [1 ,2 ]
Meyer, J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Geneva, Med Sch, Rue Michel Servet 1, CH-1206 Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Univ Hosp Geneva, Div Digest Surg, Rue Gabrielle Perret Gentil 4, CH-1211 Geneva 14, Switzerland
[3] Cambridge Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Addenbrookes Hosp, Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Cambridge, England
[4] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge, England
关键词
Complete mesocolic excision; D3; lymphadenectomy; Colon; Cancer; Surgery; CENTRAL VASCULAR LIGATION; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; COLON-CANCER SURGERY; TERM-OUTCOMES; SURVIVAL; DISSECTION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10151-023-02853-8
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Complete mesocolic excision improves lymphadenectomy for right hemicolectomy and respects the embryological planes. However, its effect on cancer-free and overall survival is questioned. Therefore, we aimed to determine the potential benefits of the technique by performing a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of the available evidence.Methods Web of Science, PubMed/Medline, and Embase were searched on February 22, 2023. Original studies on short- and long-term oncological outcomes of adult patients undergoing right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision as a treatment for primary colon cancer were considered for inclusion. Outcomes were extracted and pooled using a model with random effects.Results A total of 586 publications were identified through database searching, and 18 from citation searching. Exclusion of 552 articles left 24 articles for inclusion. Meta-analysis showed that complete mesocolic excision increased the lymph node harvest (5 studies, 1479 patients, MD 9.62, 95% CI 5.83-13.41, p > 0.0001, I-2 84%), 5-year overall survival (5 studies, 2381 patients, OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.14-3.09, p = 0.01, I-2 66%), 5-year disease-free survival (4 studies, 1376 patients, OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.51-3.23, p < 0.0001, I-2 0%) and decreased the incidence of local recurrence (4 studies, 818 patients, OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.09-0.79, p = 0.02, I-2 0%) when compared to standard right hemicolectomy. Perioperative morbidity was similar between the techniques (8 studies, 3899 patients, OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.89-1.22, p = 0.97, I-2 0%).Conclusion Meta-analysis of observational and randomised studies showed that right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision for primary right colon cancer improves oncologic results without increasing morbidity/mortality. These results need to be confirmed by high-quality evidence and randomised trials in selected patients to assess who may benefit from the procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:979 / 993
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Complete mesocolic excision for right hemicolectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    G. De Lange
    J. Davies
    C. Toso
    G. Meurette
    F. Ris
    J. Meyer
    [J]. Techniques in Coloproctology, 2023, 27 : 979 - 993
  • [2] A global systematic review and meta-analysis on laparoscopic vs open right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision
    Gabriele Anania
    Alberto Arezzo
    Richard Justin Davies
    Francesco Marchetti
    Shu Zhang
    Salomone Di Saverio
    Roberto Cirocchi
    Annibale Donini
    [J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2021, 36 : 1609 - 1620
  • [3] A global systematic review and meta-analysis on laparoscopic vs open right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision
    Anania, Gabriele
    Arezzo, Alberto
    Davies, Richard Justin
    Marchetti, Francesco
    Zhang, Shu
    Di Saverio, Salomone
    Cirocchi, Roberto
    Donini, Annibale
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2021, 36 (08) : 1609 - 1620
  • [4] Complete mesocolic excision versus conventional hemicolectomy in patients with right colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    De Simoni, Ottavia
    Barina, Andrea
    Sommariva, Antonio
    Tonello, Marco
    Gruppo, Mario
    Mattara, Genny
    Toniato, Antonio
    Pilati, Pierluigi
    Franzato, Boris
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2021, 36 (05) : 881 - 892
  • [5] Complete mesocolic excision versus conventional hemicolectomy in patients with right colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ottavia De Simoni
    Andrea Barina
    Antonio Sommariva
    Marco Tonello
    Mario Gruppo
    Genny Mattara
    Antonio Toniato
    Pierluigi Pilati
    Boris Franzato
    [J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2021, 36 : 881 - 892
  • [6] Laparoscopic versus open complete mesocolic excision: a systematic review by updated meta-analysis
    Gavriilidis, Paschalis
    Davies, R. Justin
    Biondi, Antonio
    Wheeler, James
    Testini, Mario
    Carcano, Giulio
    Di Saverio, Salomone
    [J]. UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2020, 72 (03) : 639 - 648
  • [7] Laparoscopic versus open complete mesocolic excision: a systematic review by updated meta-analysis
    Paschalis Gavriilidis
    R. Justin Davies
    Antonio Biondi
    James Wheeler
    Mario Testini
    Giulio Carcano
    Salomone Di Saverio
    [J]. Updates in Surgery, 2020, 72 : 639 - 648
  • [8] A systematic review and meta-analysis of variants of the branches of the superior mesenteric artery: the Achilles heel of right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision?
    Cirocchi, Roberto
    Randolph, Justus
    Davies, R. Justin
    Cheruiyot, Isaac
    Gioia, Sara
    Henry, Brandon Michael
    Carlini, Luigi
    Donini, Annibale
    Anania, Gabriele
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2021, 23 (11) : 2834 - 2845
  • [9] Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision Versus Noncomplete Mesocolic Excision: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Dai, Qiaoqiong
    Tu, Shiliang
    Dong, Quanjin
    Chen, Bingchen
    [J]. SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2021, 31 (01): : 96 - 103
  • [10] Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision
    Kang, Jeonghyun
    Kim, Im-kyung
    Kang, Sung Ii
    Sohn, Seung-Kook
    Lee, Kang Young
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 28 (09): : 2747 - 2751