US global health aid policy and family planning in sub-Saharan Africa

被引:0
|
作者
Brooks, Nina [1 ]
Gunther, Matt [2 ]
Bendavid, Eran [3 ]
Boyle, Elizabeth H. [2 ,4 ]
Grace, Kathryn [2 ,5 ]
Miller, Grant [3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Global Hlth, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Inst Social Res & Data Innovat, Minneapolis, MN USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Stanford, CA USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Sociol Dept, Minneapolis, MN USA
[5] Univ Minnesota, Dept Geog Environm & Soc, Minneapolis, MN USA
[6] Natl Bur Econ Res NBER, Cambridge, MA USA
关键词
POPULATION; PROGRAMS; ABORTION; CHILD;
D O I
10.1126/sciadv.adk2684
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The Trump administration reinstated and expanded the Mexico City Policy (MCP) in 2017 as the Protecting Life in Global Health Assistance (PLGHA) policy, forbidding international organizations receiving all U.S. health assistance from promoting abortion. Existing evidence suggests that abortion rates rise under the MCP, but the direct effect of U.S. funding restrictions on supply and use of family planning has received less attention. By studying PLGHA's impact on health service delivery providers and women in eight sub-Saharan African countries, we are able to fill this gap. We find that health facilities provide fewer family planning services, including emergency contraception, and that women are less likely to use contraception and more likely to have given birth recently under the policy. These findings suggest that PLGHA has important unintended consequences that are detrimental to reproductive health and the autonomous decision-making of health service providers and women.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条