Post Surgical Management of WHO Grade II Meningiomas: Our Experience, the Role of Gamma Knife and a Literature Review

被引:1
|
作者
Migliorati, Karol [1 ]
Spatola, Giorgio [1 ]
Giudice, Lodoviga [1 ]
de Graaf, Nine [2 ,3 ]
Bassetti, Chiara [4 ]
Giorgi, Cesare [1 ]
Fontanella, Marco [5 ]
Vivaldi, Oscar [1 ]
Bignardi, Mario [6 ]
Franzin, Alberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Poliambulanza, Dept Neurosurg, I-25124 Brescia, Italy
[2] Fdn Poliambulanza, Dept Gen Surg, I-25124 Brescia, Italy
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Canc Ctr Amsterdam, Dept Surg, NL-1012 WX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Fdn Poliambulanza, Med Phys Unit, I-25124 Brescia, Italy
[5] Univ Brescia, Dept Surg Specialties Radiol Sci & Publ Hlth, Div Neurosurg, I-25124 Brescia, Italy
[6] Fdn Poliambulanza, Dept Radiat Oncol, I-25124 Brescia, Italy
来源
LIFE-BASEL | 2023年 / 13卷 / 01期
关键词
atypical meningiomas; WHO grade II meningiomas; Gamma Knife; radiosurgery; GKRS; Simpson grade; GROSS TOTAL RESECTION; STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY; INTRACRANIAL MENINGIOMAS; RADIOTHERAPY; ADJUVANT; RECURRENCE; OUTCOMES; SURGERY;
D O I
10.3390/life13010037
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Purpose: Grade II meningiomas are rarer than Grade I, and when operated on, bear a higher risk of local recurrence, with a 5-year progression free survival (PFS) ranging from 59 to 90%. Radiotherapy (RT) or radiosurgery, such as Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) can reduce the risk of relapse in patients with residual disease, even if their role, particularly after gross total resection (GTR), is still under debate. Main goal of this study was to compare the outcomes of different post-surgical management of grade II meningiomas, grouped by degree of surgical removal (Simpson Grade); next in order we wanted to define the role of GKRS for the treatment of residual disease or relapse. Methods: from November 2016 to November 2020 all patients harboring grade II meningiomas, were divided into three groups, based on post-surgical management: (1) wait and see, (2) conventional adjuvant radiotherapy and (3) stereotactic GKRS radiosurgery. Relapse rate and PFS were registered at the time of last follow up and results were classified as stable, recurrence next to or distant from the surgical cavity. In the second part of the study we collected data of all patients who underwent GKRS in our Centers from November 2017 to November 2020. Results: A total of 37 patients were recruited, including seven patients with multiple meningiomas. Out of 47 meningiomas, 33 (70.2%) were followed with a wait and see strategy, six (12.7%) were treated with adjuvant radiotherapy, and 8 patients (17.0%) with adjuvant GKRS. Follow up data were available for 43 (91.4%) meningiomas. Within the wait and see group, recurrence rates differed based on Simpson grades, lower recurrence rates being observed in three Simpson I cases (30%) compared to twelve relapses (60%) in patients with Simpson grade II/III. Finally, out of the 24 meningiomas undergoing GKRS (8 residual and 16 recurrence), 21 remained stable at follow up. Conclusions: Gross total resection (GTR) Simpson II and III have a significantly worse outcome as compared to Simpson I. The absence of adjuvant treatment leads to significant worsening of the disease progression curve. Adjuvant radiotherapy, especially GKRS, provides good local control of the disease and should be considered as an adjuvant treatment in all cases where Simpson I resection is not possible.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Role of Gamma Knife surgery for intracranial atypical (WHO Grade II) meningiomas
    Hanakita, Shunya
    Koga, Tomoyuki
    Igaki, Hiroshi
    Murakami, Naoya
    Oya, Soichi
    Shin, Masahiro
    Saito, Nobuhito
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2013, 119 (06) : 1410 - 1414
  • [2] Role of hydroxyurea as an adjuvant treatment after Gamma knife radiosurgery for atypical (WHO grade II) meningiomas
    Karim, Khalid Abdel
    El Shehaby, Amr
    Emad, Reem
    Reda, Wael
    El Mahdy, Manal
    Ghali, Ramy
    Nabeel, Ahmed
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE EGYPTIAN NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2018, 30 (02) : 69 - 72
  • [3] ROLE OF HYDROXYUREA AS AN ADJUVANT TREATMENT AFTER GAMMA KNIFE RADIOSURGERY FOR ATYPICAL (WHO GRADE II) MENINGIOMAS
    Karim, K. Abdel
    El Shehaby, A.
    Emad, R.
    Reda, W.
    El Mahdy, M.
    Ghali, R.
    Nabeel, A.
    [J]. NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2016, 18 : 67 - 68
  • [4] The role of radiosurgery in the management of WHO Grade II and III intracranial meningiomas
    Ding, Dale
    Starke, Robert M.
    Hantzmon, John
    Williams, Brian J.
    Sheehan, Jason P.
    [J]. NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2013, 35 (06)
  • [5] The role of gamma knife radiosurgery in the management of cavernous sinus meningiomas
    Nicolato, A
    Foroni, R
    Alessandrini, F
    Maluta, S
    Bricolo, A
    Gerosa, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 53 (04): : 992 - 1000
  • [6] Role of Gamma Knife Radiosurgery in the Management of Functional Disorders - A Literature Review
    Verma, Satish
    Agrawal, Deepak
    Singh, Manmohan
    [J]. NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2023, 71 : S49 - S58
  • [7] Role of adjuvant radiotherapy in atypical (WHO grade II) and anaplastic (WHO grade III) meningiomas: a systematic review
    Delgado-Lopez, P. D.
    Corrales-Garcia, E. M.
    [J]. CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 23 (02): : 205 - 221
  • [8] Role of adjuvant radiotherapy in atypical (WHO grade II) and anaplastic (WHO grade III) meningiomas: a systematic review
    P. D. Delgado-López
    E. M. Corrales-García
    [J]. Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2021, 23 : 205 - 221
  • [9] Surgical Management of Genitourinary Tuberculosis: our Experience and review of literature
    Mittal, Ankur
    Ranjan, Satish Kumar
    Narain, Tushar Aditya
    Panwar, Vikas Kumar
    [J]. POLISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 92 (06) : 1 - 5
  • [10] Role of gamma knife radiosurgery for recurrent or residual World Health Organization grade II and III intracranial meningiomas
    Kim, Moinay
    Cho, Young Hyun
    Kim, Jeong Hoon
    Kim, Chang Jin
    Roh, Sung Woo
    Kwon, Do Hoon
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 34 (03) : 239 - 245