Comparison of three regimens with inhalational methoxyflurane versus intranasal fentanyl versus intravenous morphine in pre-hospital acute pain management: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (PreMeFen)

被引:3
|
作者
Simensen, Randi [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Fjose, Lars Olav [1 ,2 ]
Rehn, Marius [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Hagemo, Jostein [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Thorsen, Kjetil [2 ]
Heyerdahl, Fridtjof [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Innlandet Hosp Trust, Div Prehosp Serv, Kastbakkvegen 9, N-2390 Moelv, Norway
[2] Norwegian Air Ambulance Fdn, Dept Res, Oslo, Norway
[3] Oslo Univ Hosp, Div Prehosp Serv, Oslo, Norway
[4] Univ Oslo, Inst Clin Med, Fac Med, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Analgesia; Pre-hospital; Emergency medicine; Acute pain; Opioids; Methoxyflurane; TRAUMA PAIN; ANALGESIA; INTENSITY;
D O I
10.1186/s13063-023-07590-9
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BackgroundPre-hospital pain management has traditionally been performed with intravenous (IV) morphine, but oligoanalgesia remain a recognized problem. Pain reduction is essential for patient satisfaction and is regarded as a measure of successful treatment. We aim to establish whether non-invasive methods such as inhalation of methoxyflurane is non-inferior to intranasal fentanyl or non-inferior to the well-known IV morphine in the pre-hospital treatment of acute pain.Method/designThe PreMeFen study is a phase three, three-armed, randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial to compare three regimens of analgesics: inhalation of methoxyflurane and intranasal (IN) fentanyl versus IV morphine. It is an open-label trial with a 1:1:1 randomization to the three treatment groups. The primary endpoint is the change in pain numeric rating scale (NRS) (0-10) from baseline to 10 min after start of investigational medicinal product administration (IMP). The non-inferiority margin was set to 1.3, and a sample size of 270 patients per protocol (90 in each treatment arm) will detect this difference with 90% power.DiscussionWe chose a study design with comparison of analgesic regimens rather than fixed doses because of the substantial differences in drug characteristics and for the results to be relevant to inform policymakers in the pre-hospital setting. We recognize that easier administration of analgesics will lead to better pain management for many patients if the regimens are as good as the existing, and hence, we chose a non-inferiority design. The primary endpoint, the change in pain (NRS) after 10 min, is set to address the immediate need of pain reduction for patients with acute prehospital pain. On a later stage, more analgesic methods are often available.SummaryPreMeFen is a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial comparing three analgesic regimens aiming to establish whether inhalation of methoxyflurane or intranasal fentanyl is as good as IV morphine for fast reduction of acute pain in the prehospital setting.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of three regimens with inhalational methoxyflurane versus intranasal fentanyl versus intravenous morphine in pre-hospital acute pain management: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (PreMeFen)
    Randi Simensen
    Lars Olav Fjose
    Marius Rehn
    Jostein Hagemo
    Kjetil Thorsen
    Fridtjof Heyerdahl
    [J]. Trials, 24
  • [2] INTRANASAL SUFENTANIL VERSUS INTRAVENOUS MORPHINE FOR ACUTE PAIN IN THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT: A RANDOMIZED PILOT TRIAL
    Sin, Billy
    Jeffrey, Iain
    Halpern, Zachary
    Adebayo, Adebanke
    Wing, Tom
    Lee, Amy S.
    Ruiz, Josel
    Persaud, Kevin
    Davenport, Lilia
    de Souza, Sylvie
    Williams, Mollie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2019, 56 (03): : 301 - 307
  • [3] A randomized controlled trial comparing intranasal fentanyl to intravenous morphine for managing acute pain in children in the emergency department
    Borland, Meredith
    Jacobs, Ian
    King, Barbara
    O'Brien, Debra
    [J]. ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2007, 49 (03) : 335 - 340
  • [4] Intranasal ketamine versus intravenous morphine for pain management in patients with renal colic: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial
    Mahboub Pouraghaei
    Payman Moharamzadeh
    Seyed Pouya Paknezhad
    Zahra Vand Rajabpour
    Hassan Soleimanpour
    [J]. World Journal of Urology, 2021, 39 : 1263 - 1267
  • [5] Intranasal ketamine versus intravenous morphine for pain management in patients with renal colic: a double-blind, randomized, controlled trial
    Pouraghaei, Mahboub
    Moharamzadeh, Payman
    Paknezhad, Seyed Pouya
    Rajabpour, Zahra Vand
    Soleimanpour, Hassan
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (04) : 1263 - 1267
  • [6] Intranasal Ketamine versus Intravenous Morphine for Pain Management in Patients with Renal Colic: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comment
    不详
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 205 (01): : 298 - 299
  • [7] Intranasal fentanyl versus intravenous morphine in the emergency department treatment of severe painful sickle cell crises in children: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Michael Joseph Barrett
    John Cronin
    Adrian Murphy
    Siobhan McCoy
    John Hayden
    SinéadNic an Fhailí
    Tim Grant
    Abel Wakai
    Corrina McMahon
    Sean Walsh
    Ronan O’Sullivan
    [J]. Trials, 13
  • [8] Intranasal fentanyl versus intravenous morphine in the emergency department treatment of severe painful sickle cell crises in children: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    Barrett, Michael Joseph
    Cronin, John
    Murphy, Adrian
    McCoy, Siobhan
    Hayden, John
    Fhaili, SineadNic An
    Grant, Tim
    Wakai, Abel
    McMahon, Corrina
    Walsh, Sean
    O'Sullivan, Ronan
    [J]. TRIALS, 2012, 13
  • [9] Intravenous morphine versus intravenous paracetamol after cardiac surgery in neonates and infants: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Gerdien A. Zeilmaker-Roest
    Joost van Rosmalen
    Monique van Dijk
    Erik Koomen
    Nicolaas J. G. Jansen
    Martin C. J. Kneyber
    Sofie Maebe
    Greet van den Berghe
    Dirk Vlasselaers
    Ad J. J. C. Bogers
    Dick Tibboel
    Enno D. Wildschut
    [J]. Trials, 19
  • [10] Intravenous morphine versus intravenous paracetamol after cardiac surgery in neonates and infants: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Zeilmaker-Roest, Gerdien A.
    van Rosmalen, Joost
    van Dijk, Monique
    Koomen, Erik
    Jansen, Nicolaas J. G.
    Kneyber, Martin C. J.
    Maebe, Sofie
    van den Berghe, Greet
    Vlasselaers, Dirk
    Bogers, Ad J. J. C.
    Tibboel, Dick
    Wildschut, Enno D.
    [J]. TRIALS, 2018, 19