Exploring the osteoporosis treatment gap after fragility hip fracture at a Tertiary University Medical Center in Thailand

被引:7
|
作者
Mahaisavariya, Chantas [1 ]
Vanitcharoenkul, Ekasame [2 ]
Kitcharanant, Nitchanant [3 ]
Chotiyarnwong, Pojchong [2 ]
Unnanuntana, Aasis [2 ]
机构
[1] Mahidol Univ, Fac Med, Golden Jubilee Med Ctr, Siriraj Hosp, Bangkok, Thailand
[2] Mahidol Univ, Fac Med, Siriraj Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 2 Wanglang Rd,Bangkoknoi, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
[3] Chiang Mai Univ, Fac Med, Dept Orthopaed, Chiang Mai, Thailand
关键词
Anti-osteoporosis medication; Hip fracture; Prescription rate; Non-persistence; Not receiving; THERAPY; REASONS; RISK;
D O I
10.1186/s12877-023-03778-5
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Background(1) To evaluate the prescription rate of anti-osteoporosis medication, and (2) to identify factors associated with patients not receiving anti-osteoporosis medication or, when prescribed, not persisting with medication 1 year after hip fracture treatment.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of all fragility hip fracture patients admitted to the orthopedic unit of the Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, between July 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019. We identified patients who did not receive anti-osteoporosis medication both 6 months and 1 year after fracture treatment. Patients who did not receive the medication 1 year after their treatment were enrolled and interviewed using a no-treatment questionnaire.ResultsIn total, 530 patients with fragility hip fractures were eligible (mean age, 79.0 years), and most (74.5%) were women. Only 148 patients (31.6%) received anti-osteoporosis medication 1 year after hip fracture. Logistic regression analysis identified predictors for not receiving the medication: male sex (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.1-3.0), Charlson comorbidity index score >= 5 (OR 1.5; 95% CI 1.0-2.3), and secondary school education or below (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.2-3.3). The main reason for not receiving the medication was that healthcare providers neither discussed nor initiated pharmacological treatment for osteoporosis (48.2%). When the medication was prescribed, non-persistence primarily stemmed from transportation difficulties that resulted in patients missing follow-ups (50.0%).ConclusionsImproved physician attitudes toward anti-osteoporosis medications might enhance the treatment rate. Developing a follow-up team and facilitating access to medications (eg, courier delivery to patients) would promote therapy compliance.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exploring the osteoporosis treatment gap after fragility hip fracture at a Tertiary University Medical Center in Thailand
    Chantas Mahaisavariya
    Ekasame Vanitcharoenkul
    Nitchanant Kitcharanant
    Pojchong Chotiyarnwong
    Aasis Unnanuntana
    [J]. BMC Geriatrics, 23
  • [2] GROWING TREND OF OSTEOPOROSIS TREATMENT AFTER HIP FRACTURE IN THAILAND
    Klunklin, K. K.
    Leerapun, T. L.
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 27 : S226 - S226
  • [3] The yawning gap between osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment after a fragility fracture in Mexico
    Macias-Hernandez, Salvador Israel
    Degollado-Rodriguez, Miriam Macarena
    Maldonado-Sanchez, Horacio
    de Leon, Andrea Olascoaga-Gomez
    Coronado-Zarco, Roberto
    Nava-Bringas, Tania Ines
    Ramirez-Perez, Esperanza
    Cruz-Medina, Eva
    Espinosa-Morales, Rolando
    Morones-Alba, Juan Daniel
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF OSTEOPOROSIS, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [4] The yawning gap between osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment after a fragility fracture in Mexico
    Salvador Israel Macías-Hernández
    Miriam Macarena Degollado-Rodríguez
    Horacio Maldonado-Sánchez
    Andrea Olascoaga-Gómez de León
    Roberto Coronado-Zarco
    Tania Inés Nava-Bringas
    Esperanza Ramírez-Pérez
    Eva Cruz-Medina
    Rolando Espinosa-Morales
    Juan Daniel Morones-Alba
    [J]. Archives of Osteoporosis, 2021, 16
  • [5] OSTEOPOROSIS MANAGEMENT IN A FRAGILITY FRACTURE PATIENTS AT TERTIARY REFERRAL CENTER, MALAYSIA
    Leong, J. F.
    Sharkawi, M. A.
    Levin, K. B.
    Mohd-Ariff, M. A.
    Yin, M. K.
    Sabarul, A. M.
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 30 : S619 - S619
  • [6] Influence of bone densitometry on the anti-osteoporosis treatment after fragility hip fracture
    Peiwen Wang
    Yizhong Li
    Huafeng Zhuang
    Haiming Yu
    Siqing Cai
    Hao Xu
    Zhenhui Chen
    Jinkuang Lin
    Xuedong Yao
    [J]. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research, 2019, 31 : 1525 - 1529
  • [7] Influence of bone densitometry on the anti-osteoporosis treatment after fragility hip fracture
    Wang, Peiwen
    Li, Yizhong
    Zhuang, Huafeng
    Yu, Haiming
    Cai, Siqing
    Xu, Hao
    Chen, Zhenhui
    Lin, Jinkuang
    Yao, Xuedong
    [J]. AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2019, 31 (10) : 1525 - 1529
  • [8] Minding the bone: Measuring the opportunity for improved osteoporosis treatment after hip fracture at an academic medical center
    Gilliam, M.
    Emmett, D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2018, 66 : S121 - S121
  • [9] HIP FRAGILITY FRACTURE AND THE OSTEOPOROTIC TREATMENT GAP IN THE MALAYSIAN POPULATION
    Nasadurai, R.
    Zain, M. Mohd
    Athar, S. Sabir Husin
    Rao, D. R. Ramakrishna
    Zainuddin, P. A. Megat Mohamad
    Zhi, C. Yi
    [J]. AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 2022, 34 (SUPPL 1) : S391 - S391
  • [10] Addresssing the osteoporosis treatment care gap in outpatients suffering a fragility fracture
    Juby, A. G.
    Bayne, P.
    Yuksel, N.
    Hanley, D.
    Kline, G.
    Wirzba, B.
    Hagen, S.
    Letourneau, S.
    Shemanchuk, C.
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 17 : S265 - S265