Effect of preoperative cervical conization before hysterectomy on survival and recurrence of patients with cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Han, Ling [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Yali [1 ,2 ]
Zheng, Ai [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Hengxi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Univ Hosp 2, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, 20,3rd Sect,South Renmin Rd, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, Key Lab Birth Defects & Related Dis Women & Childr, Minist Educ, Sichuan 610041, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, West China Univ Hosp 2, Ambulatory Surg Ctr, 20,3rd Sect,South Renmin Rd, Chengdu 610041, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
Preoperative conization; Survival; Recurrence; Cervical cancer; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; PROGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.05.004
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. Conization plays a therapeutic and diagnostic role in cervical cancer. We conducted a systematic re-view and meta-analysis to compare the clinical outcomes of patients with cervical cancer who underwent hys-terectomy with versus without preoperative cervical conization.Methods. In this meta-analysis, we analyzed studies published in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and Clinical Trials. gov that appeared in our search from inception to May 1, 2022.Results. Eleven studies with 4184 participants were included in this review. There were 2122 patients in the preoperative conization group and 2062 patients in the non-conization group. The meta-analysis showed that disease free survival (DFS) (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.23; 95% CI: 0.12-0.44; 1616 participants; P = 0.030) and overall survival (OS) (HR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.33-0.86; 1835 participants; P = 0.597) were improved in the preoperative conization group compared with those in the non-conization group. The risk for recurrence was lower in the pre -operative conization group than in the non-conization group (odds ratio [OR]: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.17-0.48; 1099 par-ticipants; P = 0.434). There was no significant statistical difference regarding intraoperative adverse events (OR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.18-3.70; 530 participants; P = 0.555) and postoperative adverse events (OR: 1.24; 95% CI: 0.54-2.85; 530 participants; P = 0.170) between the preoperative conization group and non-conization group. In subgroup analysis, patients who benefited more from preoperative conization, had underwent minimally invasive surgery, had smaller local tumor lesions, and had no lymph node involvement.Conclusions. Preoperative conization before radical hysterectomy may have a protective effect in the treat-ment of early cervical cancer, with better survival and less recurrence, especially when the patient is at an early stage and undergoes minimally invasive surgery.(c) 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 174
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Radical Hysterectomy With Preoperative Conization in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Pairwise and Network Meta-Analysis
    Zhu, Xinbin
    Ye, Lele
    Fu, Yunfeng
    You, Bingbing
    Lu, Weiguo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 31 (03) : 193 - 199
  • [2] Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Smith, Anna Jo Bodurtha
    Jones, Tiffany Nicole
    Miao, Diana
    Fader, Amanda Nickles
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 28 (03) : 544 - U60
  • [3] Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jones, Tiffany
    Smith, Anna Jo
    Miao, Diana
    Fader, Amanda
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 162 : S206 - S207
  • [4] Accuracy of mRNA HPV tests as a predictor of recurrence of precursor lesions and cervical cancer after conization: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Macedo, Ana Cristina L.
    Moretti Borba, Cristini da Luz
    Bavaresco, Daniela Vicente
    Colonetti, Tamy
    Grande, Antonio Jose
    da Rosa, Maria Ines
    [J]. BIOMARKERS IN MEDICINE, 2019, 13 (06) : 497 - 506
  • [5] Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhao, Yue
    Hang, Bo
    Xiong, Guang-Wu
    Zhang, Xiao-Wei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES, 2017, 27 (11): : 1132 - 1144
  • [6] Robotic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shazly, Sherif A. M.
    Murad, Mohammad H.
    Dowdy, Sean C.
    Gostout, Bobbie S.
    Famuyide, Abimbola O.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2015, 138 (02) : 457 - 471
  • [7] Recurrence of cervical artery dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lounsbury, Elizabeth
    Niznick, Naomi
    Mallick, Ranjeeta
    Dewar, Brian
    Davis, Alexandra
    Fergusson, Dean A.
    Dowlatshahi, Dar
    Shamy, Michel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2024, 19 (04) : 388 - 396
  • [8] THE PROTECTIVE ROLE OF CONIZATION BEFORE RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY IN CERVICAL CANCER
    Guijarro Campillo, Alberto Rafael
    Sanchez-Romero, Javier
    Ramon Rodriguez-Hernandez, Jose
    Canovas, Laura
    Jose Barcelo-Valcarcel, Francisco
    Nieto, Anibal
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2022, 32 : A62 - A63
  • [9] Prognostic role of pretreatment thrombocytosis on survival in patients with cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Weijuan Cao
    Xiaomin Yao
    Danwei Cen
    Yajun Zhi
    Ningwei Zhu
    Liyong Xu
    [J]. World Journal of Surgical Oncology, 17
  • [10] Prognostic role of pretreatment thrombocytosis on survival in patients with cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cao, Weijuan
    Yao, Xiaomin
    Cen, Danwei
    Zhi, Yajun
    Zhu, Ningwei
    Xu, Liyong
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 17 (01)