Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic comparison between generic and brand-name levofloxacin based on Monte Carlo simulation

被引:0
|
作者
Ma, Pan [1 ]
Shang, Shenglan [2 ]
Feng, Wei [1 ]
Liu, Chang [3 ]
Liu, Fang [1 ]
Xiong, Lirong [1 ]
Dai, Qing [1 ]
Chen, Yongchuan [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Army Med Univ, Mil Med Univ 3, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Pharm, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Gen Hosp Cent Theater Command PLA, Dept Clin Pharm, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ Shenzhen Hosp, Clin Trial Inst, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[4] Army Med Univ, Dept Pharm, Affiliated Hosp 1, Gaotanyan St 29, Chongqing 400038, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Levofloxacin; Generic drugs; Pharmacokinetics; Pharmacodynamics; Pharmacokinetic; pharmacodynamic; Monte Carlo simulation; IN-VIVO; PHARMACOKINETICS; ANTIBIOTICS; INFECTIONS; SELECTION; EFFICACY; QUALITY; DOSAGE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.jgar.2023.03.002
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objective: Generic medications are widely used because of their low cost. However, some generic medications show lower quality and clinical efficacy compared with brand-name medications, especially for antimicrobial drugs. Levofloxacin is a fluoroquinolone antimicrobial drug with excellent antimicrobial activity and wide antimicrobial spectrum, while it is susceptible to drug resistance. Our study aims to evaluate the bioequivalence of generic and brand-name levofloxacin.Methods: The pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters (C max , AUC 0 similar to 24 , T max , and t 1/2 ), pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters (in vitro antibacterial activity and the inhibition of resistant mutation), and PK/PD analysis (the probability of target attainment; the cumulative fraction of response) calculated by Monte Carlo simulation were investigated.Results: Our results demonstrated that compared with generics, brand-name levofloxacin not only had higher drug content, it also showed higher antimicrobial susceptibility, higher resistance to mutation ability, and higher percentage of each dosage interval wherein plasma concentration of antimicrobial agents exceeded the MPC 90 (mutant prevention concentration to prevent the mutation of 90% strains) against various clinical isolates. Although the differences in AUC 0 similar to 24 between brand-name levofloxacin and generics were not statistically significant ( P > 0.05, F test), Monte Carlo simulation results showed cumulative fraction of response values for PK/PD of brand-name medications were higher than generics.Conclusion: Our results indicated that PK or PD equivalence did not imply therapeutic equivalence; thus, we suggest including PK/PD analysis in the bioequivalence evaluation system, which benefits prediction of clinical outcome with high application value.(c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for AntimicrobialChemotherapy.This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ )
引用
收藏
页码:120 / 129
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bioequivalence and in vitro antimicrobial activity between generic and brand-name levofloxacin
    Sun, Hsin-Yun
    Liao, Hsiao-Wei
    Sheng, Meng-Huei
    Tai, Hui-Min
    Kuo, Ching-Hua
    Sheng, Wang-Huei
    [J]. DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2016, 85 (03) : 347 - 351
  • [2] Comparison of Pharmacokinetic Profiles of Brand-Name and Generic Formulations of Citalopram and Venlafaxine: A Crossover Study
    Chenu, Franck
    Batten, Lisa A.
    Zernig, Gerald
    Ladstaetter, Elisabeth
    Hebert, Chantal
    Blier, Pierre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 70 (07) : 958 - 966
  • [3] Comparison of the Properties of Brand-Name and Generic Nadifloxacin Creams
    Inoue, Yutaka
    Matsumoto, Miruto
    Kimura, Masayuki
    Tanaka, Toru
    Kanamoto, Ikuo
    [J]. MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2011, 47 (11): : 616 - 622
  • [4] Cisplatin-induced hyponatremia in malignancy: comparison between brand-name and generic formulation
    Ochi, Nobuaki
    Yamane, Hiromichi
    Hotta, Katsuyuki
    Fujii, Hiromi
    Isozaki, Hideko
    Honda, Yoshihiro
    Yamagishi, Tomoko
    Kubo, Toshio
    Tanimoto, Mitsune
    Kiura, Katsuyuki
    Takigawa, Nagio
    [J]. DRUG DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND THERAPY, 2014, 8 : 2401 - 2408
  • [5] Labeling may differ between generic, brand-name products
    Traynor, K
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2002, 59 (10) : 912 - +
  • [6] Investigation of Bioequivalence Between Brand-name and Generic Irinotecan Products
    Saito, Ken-Ichi
    Inoue, Yutaka
    Ikegami, Yoji
    Nanbo, Izumi
    Onozuka, Mari
    Sano, Kazumi
    Yoshida, Hisahiro
    Sakamoto, Toshihiro
    Tatebayashi, Emi
    Fujita, Ken-Ichi
    Sasaki, Yasutsuna
    Kitazawa, Takaki
    [J]. ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 36 (11) : 5957 - 5963
  • [7] Prediction of Systemic Exposure of Ketoprofen Tapes by In Vitro Release Test and Pharmacokinetic Model Analysis: Comparison between Brand-name and Generic Formulations
    Awa, Keisuke
    Satoh, Hiroki
    Hori, Satoko
    Sawada, Yasufumi
    [J]. YAKUGAKU ZASSHI-JOURNAL OF THE PHARMACEUTICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 2012, 132 (01): : 135 - 144
  • [8] A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of generic and brand name atenolol in hypertensive subjects.
    Lang, CC
    Mustafa, AM
    Chan, SL
    Choy, AM
    Mustafa, MR
    Mohamed, Z
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1998, 63 (02) : 234 - 234
  • [9] The Comparison of Brand-Name and Generic Formulations of Venlafaxine: A Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Analysis
    Unterecker, Stefan
    Proft, Florian
    Riederer, Peter
    Lauer, Martin
    Deckert, Juergen
    Pfuhlmann, Bruno
    [J]. THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 2014, 36 (02) : 269 - 272
  • [10] APPLICATION OF PHARMACOKINETIC/PHARMACODYNAMIC MODELING TO SIMULATE POTENTIAL DIFFERENCES IN BIOEQUIVALENCE BETWEEN GENERIC AND BRAND NAME GABAPENTIN PRODUCTS
    Meng, Z.
    Trame, M. N.
    Schmidt, S.
    Fang, L.
    Lesko, L.
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2016, 99 : S61 - S62