Are Vascularized Fibula Autografts a Long-lasting Reconstruction After Intercalary Resection of the Humerus for Primary Bone Tumors?

被引:2
|
作者
Campanacci, Domenico Andrea [1 ]
Scanferla, Roberto [1 ]
Innocenti, Matteo [1 ]
Muratori, Francesco [1 ]
Puccini, Serena [1 ]
Scoccianti, Guido [1 ]
Beltrami, Giovanni [2 ]
Capanna, Rodolfo [3 ]
Innocenti, Marco [4 ]
机构
[1] Careggi Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Oncol & Reconstruct Surg, Largo Palagi 1, I-50139 Florence, Italy
[2] Meyer Univ Hosp, Dept Paediat Orthopaed, Florence, Italy
[3] Cisanello Univ Hosp, Orthopaed Clin, Pisa, Italy
[4] Rizzoli Orthopaed Inst, Dept Plast Surg, Bologna, Italy
关键词
UPPER-LIMB; BIOLOGICAL RECONSTRUCTION; RELIABLE SOLUTION; MALIGNANT BONE; ALLOGRAFT; DEFECTS; NONUNION; FRACTURES; SALVAGE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1097/CORR.0000000000002739
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background A vascularized fibula graft (VFG) is the vascular autograft most frequently used to restore large segmental long bone defects, particularly in the upper limb. Because the use of a vascularized fibula involves an operation in an uninvolved extremity with potential morbidity, it is important to document that this type of reconstruction is successful in restoring function to the humerus. However, the long-term results of VFG after intercalary resection of the humeral diaphysis for bone tumors are still unknown.Questions/purposes (1) What was the complication rate of reconstruction? (2) What was the functional result after surgical treatment, as assessed by the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score, the American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) score, and Constant score? (3) What was the survivorship of these grafts free from revision and graft removal at 5, 10, and 15 years?Methods Between 1987 and 2021, 127 patients were treated at our institution with en bloc resection for a primary malignant or an aggressive benign bone tumor of the humerus; we excluded patients treated with extra-articular resection or amputation. Of those, 14% (18 of 127) were treated with intercalary resection of the humeral diaphysis for primary bone tumors and reconstruction with VFG, with or without a bulk allograft, and were analyzed in this retrospective study. Generally, our indications for reconstruction with VFG are intercalary resection of the humerus for primary malignant or aggressive benign bone tumors in patients with long life expectancy and high functional demands, in whom adequate bone stock of the proximal and distal epiphysis can be preserved. In 13 patients, VFG was used alone, whereas in five patients, a massive allograft was used. Our policy was to use VFG combined with a massive allograft in patients undergoing juxta-articular joint-sparing resections in which proximal osteotomy was performed close to the anatomic neck of the humerus to obtain more stable fixation and better tendinous reattachment of the rotator cuff and deltoid. All 18 patients who were treated with a VFG were available for follow-up at a minimum of 2 years (median follow-up 176 months, range 26 to 275 months), and although three have not been seen in the past 5 years and are not known to have died, they had 172, 163, and 236 months of follow-up, and were included. The median age at surgery was 25 years (range 2 to 63 years), the median humeral resection length was 15 cm (range 8 to 21 cm), and the median fibular length was 16 cm (range 12 to 23 cm). Complications and functional scores were ascertained by chart review that was performed by an individual not involved in patient care. Functional results were assessed with the MSTS score (range 0 to 30), the ASES score (range 0 to 100), and the Constant score (range 0% to 100%). Survivorship was estimated using a Kaplan-Meier survivorship estimator, which was suitable because there were few deaths in this series.Results Seven patients underwent a revision procedure (one radial nerve transient palsy because of screw impingement, four nonunions in three patients with one humeral head avascular necrosis, treatment for screw-related pain in one patient, and two VFG fractures), and one patient underwent VFG removal. Donor site complications were observed in four patients (one ankle valgus deformity and three claw toes-the first toe in two patients and the other toes in the third). At the final clinical control, at a median follow-up of 176 months (range 26 to 275 months), the median MSTS score was 30 of 30 (range 28 to 30), the median ASES score was 98.3 (range 93 to 100), and the median Constant score was 93.5% (range 79% to 100%). Revision-free survival was 71% (95% CI 53% to 96%) at 5 years and 57% (95% CI 37% to 88%) at 10 and 15 years; VFG removal-free survival was 94% (95% CI 83% to 100%) at 5, 10, and 15 years.Conclusion VFG appears to be an effective reconstructive option after humeral intercalary resection for primary bone tumors. These are complex procedures and should be performed by an experienced team of surgeons who recognize that complications may occur frequently in the first years after the procedure. The frequency of mechanical complications observed in the first 5 years postoperatively may be lessened by using long spanning-plate fixation, and if successful, this reconstruction provides a long-term, durable reconstruction with excellent functional results.Level of EvidenceLevel IV, therapeutic study.
引用
收藏
页码:2185 / 2197
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CORR Insights®: Are Vascularized Fibula Autografts a Long-lasting Reconstruction After Intercalary Resection of the Humerus for Primary Bone Tumors?
    Dodds, Seth D.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2023, 481 (11) : 2198 - 2199
  • [2] Intercalary Resection of the Tibia for Primary Bone Tumors: Are Vascularized Fibula Autografts With or Without Allografts a Durable Reconstruction?
    Campanacci, Domenico Andrea
    Scanferla, Roberto
    Marsico, Mariagrazia
    Scolari, Federico
    Scoccianti, Guido
    Beltrami, Giovanni
    Delcroix, Luca
    Innocenti, Marco
    Capanna, Rodolfo
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2024, 482 (06) : 960 - 975
  • [3] CORR Insights®: Intercalary Resection of the Tibia for Primary Bone Tumors: Are Vascularized Fibula Autografts With or Without Allografts a Durable Reconstruction?
    Leidinger, Benedikt
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2024, 482 (06) : 976 - 978
  • [4] Use of a vascularized fibula bone flap and intercalary allograft for diaphyseal reconstruction after resection of primary extremity bone sarcomas
    Chang, DW
    Weber, KL
    [J]. PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2005, 116 (07) : 1918 - 1925
  • [5] Intercalary reconstruction of the femur after tumour resection IS A VASCULARIZED FIBULAR AUTOGRAFT PLUS ALLOGRAFT A LONG-LASTING SOLUTION?
    Campanacci, D. A.
    Totti, F.
    Puccini, S.
    Beltrami, G.
    Scoccianti, G.
    Delcroix, L.
    Innocenti, M.
    Capanna, R.
    [J]. BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2018, 100B (03): : 378 - 386
  • [6] VASCULARIZED FIBULA GRAFT FOR RECONSTRUCTION AFTER RESECTION OF AGGRESSIVE BENIGN AND MALIGNANT BONE-TUMORS
    YAJIMA, H
    TAMAI, S
    MIZUMOTO, S
    SUGIMURA, M
    HORIUCHI, K
    [J]. MICROSURGERY, 1992, 13 (05) : 227 - 233
  • [7] Intercalary resection of the forefoot and reconstruction by a vascularized double-barreled fibula transfer
    Keller, Stephan
    Bauer, David
    Giovanoli, Pietro
    Espinosa, Norman
    Fuchs, Bruno
    [J]. SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2015, 145 : 63S - 63S
  • [8] Use of a vascularized fibula bone flap for reconstruction after resection of sarcomas
    Chang, D. W.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE IV CONGRESS OF THE WORLD SOCIETY FOR RECONSTRUCTIVE MICROSURGERY, 2007, : 123 - 125
  • [9] Combined vascularized fibula and allograft shell after resection of primary malignant bone tumors of the lower limb
    Hennen, J
    Sabo, D
    Martini, AK
    Bernd, L
    [J]. UNFALLCHIRURG, 2002, 105 (02): : 120 - 127
  • [10] Use of Solid Intercalary Allografts for Reconstruction Following the Resection of Primary Bone Tumors
    Pazourek, L.
    Tomas, T.
    Mahdal, M.
    Janicek, P.
    Cerny, J.
    Ondrusek, S.
    [J]. ACTA CHIRURGIAE ORTHOPAEDICAE ET TRAUMATOLOGIAE CECHOSLOVACA, 2018, 85 (03) : 171 - 178