Effect of Restorative Neurostimulation on Major Drivers of Chronic Low Back Pain Economic Impact

被引:5
|
作者
Shaffrey, Christopher [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Gilligan, Christopher [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Neurol Surg, Med Ctr, Durham, NC USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol Perioperat & Pain Med, Div Pain Med, Chestnut Hill, MA USA
[3] Dept Orthopaed, Box DUMC 3077, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[4] Dept Neurol Surg, Box DUMC 3077, Durham, NC 27710 USA
[5] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Brigham & Womens Spine Ctr, Dept Anaesthesia, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
High-impact pain; Paraspinal muscles; Healthcare utilization; Low back pain; Restorative stimulation; CARE-SEEKING BEHAVIOR; UNITED-STATES; HEALTH-CARE; DISABILITY; COSTS; TIME;
D O I
10.1227/neu.0000000000002305
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND:High-impact chronic low back pain (CLBP) correlates with high healthcare resource utilization. Therapies that can alter impact status may provide beneficial long-term economic benefits. An implantable restorative neurostimulation system (ReActiv8, Mainstay Medical) designed to over-ride multifidus inhibition to facilitate motor control restoration, thereby resolving mechanical low back pain symptoms, has shown significant durable clinical effects in moderately and severely impacted patients.OBJECTIVE:To examine changes in high-impact chronic low back pain in patients treated with restorative neurostimulation at 2 years.METHODS:ReActiv8-B is a prospective, international, multicenter trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of restorative neurostimulation in patients with intractable CLBP and no prior surgery. For this longitudinal subanalysis, patients were stratified into low-, moderate-, and high-impact CLBP categories using the US Department of Health and Human Services definition comprising pain intensity, duration, and impact on work, self-care, and daily activities.RESULTS:Of 2-year completers (n = 146), 71% had high-impact CLBP at baseline and this proportion reduced to 10%, with 85% reporting no or low impact. This corresponds with measurements of HRQoL returning to near-population norms.CONCLUSION:In addition to clinically meaningful improvements in pain and function with long-term durability, the overwhelming majority of patients transitioned from a high- to a no- or low-impact CLBP state. This is typically associated with significantly lower healthcare-utilization levels. The of recovery trajectory is consistent with a restorative mechanism of action and suggests that over the long term, the improvement in these health states will be maintained.
引用
收藏
页码:716 / 724
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Durability of the Therapeutic Effect of Restorative Neurostimulation for Refractory Chronic Low Back Pain
    Mitchell, Bruce
    Deckers, Kristiaan
    De Smedt, Kris
    Russo, Marc
    Georgius, Peter
    Green, Matthew
    Gulve, Ashish
    Van Buyten, Jean-Pierre
    Smet, Iris
    Mehta, Vivek
    Baranidharan, Ganesan
    Rathmell, James
    Gilligan, Chris
    Goss, Ben
    Eldabe, Sam
    NEUROMODULATION, 2021, 24 (06): : 1024 - 1032
  • [2] Real-World Evidence for Restorative Neurostimulation in Chronic Low Back Pain-a Consecutive Cohort Study
    Ardeshiri, Ardeshir
    Shaffrey, Christopher
    Stein, Klaus -Peter
    Sandalcioglu, Ibrahim Erol
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 168 : E253 - E259
  • [3] RELAXATION AND MEDULLAR NEUROSTIMULATION IN THE CHRONIC LOW-BACK-PAIN
    GIMENEZ, MTL
    PSICOTHEMA, 1993, 5 (02) : 229 - 239
  • [4] Restorative Neurostimulation for Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain: Results from a Prospective Multi-centre Longitudinal Cohort
    Simon Thomson
    Rajiv Chawla
    Sarah Love-Jones
    Manohar Sharma
    Girish Vajramani
    Adam Williams
    Sam Eldabe
    Pain and Therapy, 2021, 10 : 1451 - 1465
  • [5] Restorative Neurostimulation for Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain: Results from a Prospective Multi-centre Longitudinal Cohort
    Thomson, Simon
    Chawla, Rajiv
    Love-Jones, Sarah
    Sharma, Manohar
    Vajramani, Girish
    Williams, Adam
    Eldabe, Sam
    PAIN AND THERAPY, 2021, 10 (02) : 1451 - 1465
  • [6] Three-Year Durability of Restorative Neurostimulation Effectiveness in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain and Multifidus Muscle Dysfunction
    Gilligan, Christopher
    Volschenk, Willem
    Russo, Marc
    Green, Matthew
    Gilmore, Christopher
    Mehta, Vivek
    Deckers, Kristiaan
    De Smedt, Kris
    Latif, Usman
    Sayed, Dawood
    Georgius, Peter
    Gentile, Jonathan
    Mitchell, Bruce
    Langhorst, Meredith
    Huygen, Frank
    Baranidharan, Ganesan
    Patel, Vikas
    Mironer, Eugene
    Ross, Edgar
    Carayannopoulos, Alexios
    Hayek, Salim
    Gulve, Ashish
    Van Buyten, Jean-Pierre
    Tohmeh, Antoine
    Fischgrund, Jeffrey
    Lad, Shivanand
    Ahadian, Farshad
    Deer, Timothy
    Klemme, William
    Rauck, Richard
    Rathmell, James
    Schwab, Frank
    Maislin, Greg
    Heemels, Jan Pieter
    Eldabe, Sam
    NEUROMODULATION, 2023, 26 (01): : 98 - 108
  • [7] Application of restorative neurostimulation for chronic mechanical low back pain in an older population with 2-year follow up
    Ardeshiri, Ardeshir
    Amann, Marco
    Thomson, Simon
    Gilligan, Christopher J.
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2024,
  • [8] Restorative neurostimulation for chronic low back pain using ReActiv8 ® in a patient with a large lumbar disc herniation
    Aldabek, Dirar
    Schuerer, Christian
    Luchtmann, Michael
    INTERDISCIPLINARY NEUROSURGERY-ADVANCED TECHNIQUES AND CASE MANAGEMENT, 2024, 37
  • [9] THE ECONOMIC COST OF CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN
    Yumusakhuylu, Yasemin
    Baklacioglu, Hatice Sule
    Aras, Huriye
    Atlig, Raife Sirin
    Haliloglu, Sema
    Turgut, Selin Turan
    Icagasioglu, Afitap
    OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 23 : S244 - S244
  • [10] Cerebral reorganization in chronic low back pain and neurostimulation to improve motor control
    Masse-Alarie, H.
    Schneider, C.
    NEUROPHYSIOLOGIE CLINIQUE-CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 41 (02): : 51 - 60