A hybrid chemical source treatment for non-premixed combustion simulations

被引:3
|
作者
Guo, Xinliang [1 ]
Gao, Zhenxun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Beihang Univ, Sch Aeronaut Sci & Engn, Natl Lab Computat Fluid Dynam, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[2] China Aerosp Sci & Technol Corp, Lab Aerothermal Protect Technol Aerosp Vehicles, Beijing 100074, Peoples R China
[3] Beihang Univ, Aircraft & Prop Lab, Ningbo lnst Technol, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Hybrid chemical source treatment; Stiff chemistry integration; Non-premixed combustion; Point implicit method; Mixture fraction; IMPLICIT SCHEME; INTEGRATION; FLOWS; HYDROGEN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.combustflame.2022.112590
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Different approximations based on the exact point implicit (EPI) chemical source treatment, including diagonal approximation (DA), multiscale diagonal approximation (MDA), and single-scale approximation (SA), are numerically assessed and theoretically analyzed with zero-dimensional and one-dimensional combustion simulations in detail. The results show that EPI performs the best in stability, accuracy, and mass conservation. For DA and MDA methods, the ignition delay time, equilibrium temperature, and mass conservation are predicted with a significant error when the time step is large due to the diagonally non-dominant coefficient matrix. However, the error is relatively small when the reactions are weak, thus rendering the accuracy acceptable. SA method performs best in the stability perspective, but the temporal evolution of ignition can not be predicted appropriately. Based on the above conclusions, a hybrid chemical source treatment(HCST) is proposed, where the EPI method is used in chemically active regions while the MDA method is adopted in chemically inactive regions. HCST is first examined with one-dimensional non-premixed flame of various fuels. Then, a Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulation of a supersonic hydrogen/air combustion case is conducted. The same accuracy is achieved by HCST as that using the EPI method for the whole flowfield. In terms of efficiency promotion, for the hydrogen/air 9 species 19 reactions mechanism, an overall promotion of 17% is achieved, while for methane/air 53 species 325 reactions mechanism, a promotion of 75% is observed.(c) 2022 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Flamelet regime characterization for non-premixed turbulent combustion simulations
    Chan, Wai Lee
    Ihme, Matthias
    [J]. COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2017, 186 : 220 - 235
  • [2] Numerical simulations of turbulent non-premixed combustion in a regenerative furnace
    Stockwell, N
    Zhang, C
    Ishii, T
    Hino, Y
    [J]. ISIJ INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 41 (10) : 1272 - 1281
  • [3] On the experimental validation of combustion simulations in turbulent non-premixed jets
    Wu, N.
    Bushe, W. K.
    Davy, M. H.
    [J]. COMBUSTION THEORY AND MODELLING, 2010, 14 (06) : 855 - 874
  • [4] Hybrid regularized Lattice-Boltzmann modelling of premixed and non-premixed combustion processes
    Tayyab, M.
    Zhao, S.
    Feng, Y.
    Boivin, P.
    [J]. COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2020, 211 : 173 - 184
  • [5] Flamelet regime in non-premixed combustion
    Swaminathan, N
    [J]. COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2002, 129 (1-2) : 217 - 219
  • [6] Simulations of laminar non-premixed flames of methane with hot combustion products as oxidiser
    Sidey, Jenni A. M.
    Mastorakos, Epaminondas
    [J]. COMBUSTION AND FLAME, 2016, 163 : 1 - 11
  • [7] Simulations of laminar non-premixed flames of kerosene with hot combustion products as oxidiser
    Sidey, Jenni A. M.
    Giusti, Andrea
    Mastorakos, Epaminondas
    [J]. COMBUSTION THEORY AND MODELLING, 2016, 20 (05) : 958 - 973
  • [8] Comparative study of non-premixed and partially-premixed combustion simulations in a realistic Tay model combustor
    Zhang, K.
    Ghobadian, A.
    Nouri, J. M.
    [J]. APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2017, 110 : 910 - 920
  • [9] A FLAMELET MODEL OF TURBULENT NON-PREMIXED COMBUSTION
    LIEW, SK
    BRAY, KNC
    MOSS, JB
    [J]. COMBUSTION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 1981, 27 (1-2) : 69 - 73
  • [10] Investigation of modeling for non-premixed turbulent combustion
    de Bruyn Kops, SM
    Riley, JJ
    Kosály, G
    Cook, AW
    [J]. FLOW TURBULENCE AND COMBUSTION, 1998, 60 (01) : 105 - 122