Binding of task-irrelevant contextual features in task switching

被引:3
|
作者
Benini, Elena [1 ]
Koch, Iring [1 ]
Mayr, Susanne [2 ]
Frings, Christian [3 ]
Philipp, Andrea M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Inst Psychol, Cognit & Expt Psychol, Jaegerstr 17-19, D-52066 Aachen, Germany
[2] Univ Passau, Psychol & Human Machine Interact, Passau, Germany
[3] Univ Trier, Dept Cognit Psychol, Gen Psychol & Methodol, Trier, Germany
来源
关键词
Task switching; episodic retrieval; response-repetition effects; context features; RESPONSE-REPETITION; STIMULUS; RETRIEVAL; COSTS; SELECTION; RECONFIGURATION; INTERFERENCE; DISTRACTORS; ACTIVATION; PARADIGM;
D O I
10.1177/17470218221128546
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Research in attention and action control produced substantial evidence suggesting the presence of feature binding. This study explores the binding of task-irrelevant context features in cued task switching. We predicted that repeating a context feature in trial n retrieves the trial n - 1 episode. Consequently, performance should improve when the retrieved features match the features of the current trial. Two experiments (N = 124; N = 96) employing different tasks and materials showed that repeating the task-irrelevant context improved performance when the task and the response repeated. Furthermore, repeating the task-irrelevant context increased task repetition benefits only when the context feature appeared synchronously with cue onset, but not when the context feature appeared with a 300-ms delay (Experiment 1). Similarly, repeating the task-irrelevant context improved performance when the task and the response repeated only when the context feature was part of the cue, and not when it was part of the target (Experiment 2). Taken together, binding and retrieval processes seem to play a crucial role in task switching, alongside response inhibition processes. In turn, our study provided a better understanding of binding and retrieval of task-irrelevant features in general, and specifically on how they modulate response repetition benefits in task repetitions.
引用
收藏
页码:1872 / 1888
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Is Task-Irrelevant Learning Really Task-Irrelevant?
    Seitz, Aaron R.
    Watanabe, Takeo
    PLOS ONE, 2008, 3 (11):
  • [2] Task-relevant and Task-irrelevant Dimensions Are Modulated Independently at a Task-irrelevant Location
    Lustig, Audrey G.
    Beck, Diane M.
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 24 (09) : 1884 - 1895
  • [3] The role of selective attention in implicit learning: evidence for a contextual cueing effect of task-irrelevant features
    Felice Tavera
    Hilde Haider
    Psychological Research, 2025, 89 (1)
  • [4] Task-irrelevant perceptual expertise
    Wong, Yetta K.
    Folstein, Jonathan R.
    Gauthier, Isabel
    JOURNAL OF VISION, 2011, 11 (14): : 1 - 15
  • [5] Task-Irrelevant Contextual Cues Can Bias the Content of Mind Wandering
    LaPointe, Mitchell Reid
    Vinski, Melaina T.
    Watter, Scott
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 2015, 69 (04): : 334 - 334
  • [6] Contextual cueing reduces interference from task-irrelevant onset distractors
    Peterson, MS
    Kramer, AF
    VISUAL COGNITION, 2001, 8 (06) : 843 - 859
  • [7] Task Attention Facilitates Learning of Task-Irrelevant Stimuli
    Huang, Tsung-Ren
    Watanabe, Takeo
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (04):
  • [8] Perceptual learning of task-irrelevant features depends on the sensory context
    Patrick Bruns
    Takeo Watanabe
    Scientific Reports, 9
  • [9] Perceptual learning of task-irrelevant features depends on the sensory context
    Bruns, Patrick
    Watanabe, Takeo
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [10] Responses to task-irrelevant visual features by primate prefrontal neurons
    Lauwereyns, J
    Sakagami, M
    Tsutsui, KI
    Kobayashi, S
    Koizumi, M
    Hikosaka, O
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 86 (04) : 2001 - 2010