Brexit - the EU membership crisis that wasn't?

被引:1
|
作者
Schelkle, Waltraud [1 ,2 ]
Kyriazi, Anna [3 ]
Ganderson, Joseph [4 ]
Altiparmakis, Argyrios [5 ]
机构
[1] European Univ Inst, Dept Polit & Social Sci, Fiesole, Italy
[2] European Univ Inst, Robert Schuman Ctr Adv Studies, Fiesole, Italy
[3] Univ Milan, Dept Social & Polit Sci, Milan, Italy
[4] London Sch Econ, European Inst, London, England
[5] European Univ Inst, Dept Polit & Social Sci, Fiesole, Italy
关键词
Brexit; cleavages; crisis; European Union; post-functionalism; EUROPEAN-UNION; EUROSCEPTICISM; POLITICIZATION; INTEGRATION; POLITICS; BRITAIN; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1080/01402382.2024.2325780
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This introduction to the special issue recalls the alarm raised in EU capitals and Brussels after the UK's in-out referendum delivered a Leave vote in June 2016. The fear was of a domino effect and the further fragmentation of an already divided EU. Seven years later, it is clear that there was rapid attrition of Eurosceptic triumphalism, and the EU-27 showed remarkable unity. This required a sustained collective effort to contain a membership crisis and maintain the EU polity. Yet, the issue contributors challenge the notion that the alarm was unfounded and explain why this counter-factual did not materialise, even though potential for future membership crises of different sorts was revealed. Theoretically, this supports an understanding of the EU as a polity that is fragile, yet able to assert porous borders, exercise authority over a diverse membership, and mobilise a modicum of loyalty when the entire integration regime is under threat.
引用
收藏
页码:997 / 1020
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条