Acromioclavicular reconstruction techniques after acromioclavicular joint injuries: A systematic review of biomechanical studies

被引:2
|
作者
Verstraete, Olivier [1 ,2 ]
Van Tongel, Alexander [1 ]
De Wilde, Lieven [1 ]
Peeters, Ian [1 ]
机构
[1] Ghent Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Traumatol, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Corneel Heymanslaan 10, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
Acromioclavicular joint; Acromioclavicular ligament; Acromioclavicular injury; Coracoclavicular ligament; Stabilization; Reconstruction; CORACOCLAVICULAR LIGAMENTS; SURGICAL-MANAGEMENT; INTRAMEDULLARY; STABILIZATION; STABILITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2022.105847
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Background: Residual horizontal instability after surgical treatment for acromioclavicular joint injuries is seen as a potential cause of suboptimal clinical outcomes. Biomechanical studies have demonstrated that the acromio-clavicular capsule/ligaments are the primary restraints for anteroposterior translation. However, limited studies have addressed the biomechanics of a reconstruction of the acromioclavicular capsule/ligaments. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the biomechanical role of acromioclavicular capsule/ligament reconstruction techniques after an acromioclavicular joint injury.Methods: A search was carried out on the databases Medline and EMBASE, and was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. Biomechanical studies addressing horizontal and vertical displacement or joint stiffness after reconstructing the acromioclavicular capsule/ligament with or without coracoclavicular ligament reconstruc-tion, were included.Findings: Nineteen studies were included in this review after screening and eligibility assessment. Five of them investigated different sole acromioclavicular capsule/ligament reconstruction techniques. In 10 studies, a sole coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction was compared to a coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with additional acromioclavicular capsule/ligament reconstruction. The remaining 4 studies compared different acromioclavicular capsule/ligament with coracoclavicular reconstruction techniques with each other.Interpretation: Several testing protocols to evaluate acromioclavicular capsule/ligament reconstruction have been described and can make it difficult to compare the results of the different studies. Acromioclavicular capsule/ ligament reconstruction may provide increased anteroposterior and rotational stability but an optimal recon-struction technique, which mimics all biomechanical characteristics of the native joint is not yet available.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Anatomical acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction - A biomechanical comparison of reconstructive techniques of the acromioclavicular joint
    Grutter, PW
    Petersen, SA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2005, 33 (11): : 1723 - 1728
  • [2] Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: A comparative biomechanical study of three techniques
    Ladermann, Alexandre
    Stimec, Bojan
    Fasel, Jean
    Hoffmeyer, Pierre
    [J]. SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2011, 141 : 12S - 12S
  • [3] Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: a comparative biomechanical study of three techniques
    Laedermann, Alexandre
    Gueorguiev, Boyko
    Stimec, Bojan
    Fasel, Jean
    Rothstock, Stephan
    Hoffmeyer, Pierre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2013, 22 (02) : 171 - 178
  • [4] Anatomic Acromioclavicular Joint Reconstruction with and without Acromioclavicular Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparative Biomechanical Study
    Johnson, Steven M.
    Esquivel, Amanda O.
    Lovse, Lisa
    Cracchiolo, Allison M.
    Bishai, Shariff K.
    Chen, Chaoyang
    Lemos, Stephen E.
    [J]. SHOULDER & ELBOW, 2023, 15 (02) : 166 - 172
  • [5] Treatment of grade III acromioclavicular joint injuries - A systematic review
    Spencer, Edwin E., Jr.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2007, (455) : 38 - 44
  • [6] Acromioclavicular and Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction for Acromioclavicular Joint Instability: A Systematic Review of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes
    Moatshe, Gilbert
    Kruckeberg, Bradley M.
    Chahla, Jorge
    Godin, Jonathan A.
    Cinque, Mark E.
    Provencher, Matthew T.
    LaPrade, Robert F.
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2018, 34 (06): : 1979 - +
  • [7] Biomechanical comparison of two biplanar and one monoplanar reconstruction techniques of the acromioclavicular joint
    Michael O. Schär
    Stefanie Jenni
    Gion Fessel
    Jess G. Snedeker
    Markus Scheibel
    Matthias A. Zumstein
    [J]. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2019, 139 : 779 - 786
  • [8] Biomechanical comparison of two biplanar and one monoplanar reconstruction techniques of the acromioclavicular joint
    Schar, Michael O.
    Jenni, Stefanie
    Fessel, Gion
    Snedeker, Jess G.
    Scheibel, Markus
    Zumstein, Matthias A.
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2019, 139 (06) : 779 - 786
  • [9] ACROMIOCLAVICULAR JOINT INJURIES
    DAWE, CJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1980, 62 (02): : 269 - 269
  • [10] ACROMIOCLAVICULAR JOINT INJURIES
    BARNHART, JM
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1971, (81) : 199 - &