Cost of introducing and delivering RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine within the malaria vaccine implementation program

被引:3
|
作者
Baral, Ranju [1 ]
Levin, Ann [2 ]
Odero, Chris [3 ]
Pecenka, Clint [1 ]
Bawa, John Tanko [4 ]
Antwi-Agyei, Kwadwo Odei [4 ]
Amponsa-Achaino, Kwame [5 ]
Chisema, Mike Nenani [6 ]
Jalango, Rose Eddah [7 ]
Mkisi, Rouden [8 ]
Gordon, Scott [1 ]
Morgan, Winthrop [2 ]
Muhib, Farzana [9 ]
机构
[1] PATH, Ctr Vaccine Innovat & Access, Seattle, WA 98121 USA
[2] Levin & Morgan LLC, Maryland, NY USA
[3] PATH, Ctr Vaccine Innovat & Access, Nairobi, Kenya
[4] PATH, Ctr Vaccine Innovat & Access, Accra, Ghana
[5] Minist Hlth, Expanded Program Immunizat, Accra, Ghana
[6] Minist Hlth, Expanded Program Immunizat, Lilongwe, Malawi
[7] Minist Hlth, Expanded Program Immunizat, Nairobi, Kenya
[8] PATH, Ctr Vaccine Innovat & Access, Lilongwe, Malawi
[9] PATH, Ctr Vaccine Innovat & Access, Washington, DC USA
关键词
Cost; Cost of delivery; Cost of introduction; Malaria vaccine; Financial cost; Economic cost; KENYA;
D O I
10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.01.043
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommended widespread use of the RTS,S/AS01 (RTS,S) malaria vaccine among children residing in regions of moderate to high malaria transmission. This recommendation is informed by RTS,S evidence, including findings from the pilot rollout of the vac-cine in Ghana, Kenya, and Malawi. This study estimates the incremental costs of introducing and deliv-ering the malaria vaccine within routine immunization programs in the context of malaria vaccine pilot introduction, to help inform decision-making.Methods: An activity-based, retrospective costing was conducted from the governments' perspective. Vaccine introduction and delivery costs supported by the donors during the pilot introduction were attributed as costs to the governments under routine implementation. Detailed resource use data were extracted from the pilot program expenditure and activity reports for 2019-2021. Primary data from rep-resentative health facilities were collected to inform recurrent operational and service delivery costs. Costs were categorized as introduction or recurrent costs. Both financial and economic costs were esti-mated and reported in 2020 USD. The cost of donated vaccine doses was evaluated at $2, $5 and $10 per dose and included in the economic cost estimates. Financial costs include the procurement add on costs for the donated vaccines and immunization supplies, along with other direct expenses.Findings: At a vaccine price of $5 per dose, the incremental cost per dose administered across countries ranges from $2.30 to $3.01 (financial), and $8.28 to $10.29 (economic). The non-vaccine cost of delivery ranges between $1.04 and $2.46 (financial) and $1.52 and $4.62 (economic), by country. Considering only recurrent costs, the non-vaccine cost of delivery per dose ranges between $0.29 and $0.89 (financial) and $0.59 and $2.29 (economic), by country. Introduction costs constitute between 33% and 71% of total financial costs. Commodity and procurement add-on costs are the main cost drivers of total cost across countries. Incremental resource needs for implementation are dependent on country's baseline immu-nization program capacity constraints.Interpretation: The financial costs of introducing RTS,S are comparable with costs of introducing other new vaccines. Country resource requirements for malaria vaccine introduction are most influenced by vaccine price and potential donor funding for vaccine purchases and introduction support.(c) 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1496 / 1502
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Implementation of the malaria candidate vaccine RTS,S/AS01
    Greenwood, Brian
    Doumbo, Ogobara K.
    [J]. LANCET, 2016, 387 (10016): : 318 - 319
  • [2] Assessment of the RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine
    Moorthy, V. S.
    Newman, R. D.
    Duclos, P.
    Okwo-Bele, J. M.
    Smith, P. G.
    [J]. LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2013, 13 (04): : 280 - 282
  • [3] Implementation of RTS, S/AS01 Malaria Vaccine - The Need for Further Evidence
    Clemens, John
    Moorthy, Vasee
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 374 (26): : 2596 - 2597
  • [4] RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine and child mortality
    Aaby, Peter
    Rodrigues, Amabelia
    Kofoed, Poul-Erik
    Benn, Christine Stabell
    [J]. LANCET, 2015, 386 (10005): : 1735 - 1736
  • [5] The history of the RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine trial
    Keating, Conrad
    [J]. LANCET, 2020, 395 (10233): : 1336 - 1337
  • [6] RTS,S/AS01 Malaria Vaccine in African Children REPLY
    Hamel, Mary J.
    Abdulla, Salim
    Greenwood, Brian
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2012, 366 (08): : 765 - 766
  • [7] DOES REBOUND MALARIA EXPLAIN THE HETEROGENEITY IN RTS,S/AS01 MALARIA VACCINE EFFICACY?
    Bell, Griffin J.
    Gyaase, Stephaney
    Dosoo, David
    Osei, Musah
    Wiru, Kenneth
    Essone, Paulin
    Mougeni, Fabrice
    Minsoko, Pamela
    Adu, Bright
    Mensah, Benedicta
    Sinai, Cyrus
    Goel, Varun
    Niare, Karamoko
    Juliano, Jonathan
    Hudgens, Michael
    Ghansah, Anita
    Kamthunzi, Portia
    Agnandji, Selidji Todagbe
    Asante, Kwaku Poku
    Emch, Michael
    Bailey, Jeffrey
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2021, 105 (05): : 371 - 371
  • [8] The thermostability of the RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine can be increased by co-lyophilizing RTS,S and AS01
    Juliette Fortpied
    Sylvie Collignon
    Nicolas Moniotte
    Frédéric Renaud
    Babak Bayat
    Dominique Lemoine
    [J]. Malaria Journal, 19
  • [9] The thermostability of the RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine can be increased by co-lyophilizing RTS,S and AS01
    Fortpied, Juliette
    Collignon, Sylvie
    Moniotte, Nicolas
    Renaud, Frederic
    Bayat, Babak
    Lemoine, Dominique
    [J]. MALARIA JOURNAL, 2020, 19 (01)
  • [10] RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine-proven safe and effective?
    Bjorkman, Anders
    Benn, Christine Stabell
    Aaby, Peter
    Schapira, Allan
    [J]. LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2023, 23 (08): : E318 - E322