Barriers and facilitators to address vaping in Massachusetts schools: a mixed-methods study of school-based stakeholders

被引:1
|
作者
Liu, Jessica [1 ]
Roberts, Jane [2 ]
Reynolds, Matthew J. [3 ]
Hanby, Elaine [4 ]
Gundersen, Daniel A. [1 ,2 ]
Winickoff, Jonathan P. [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Rees, Vaughan W. [1 ]
Emmons, Karen M. [1 ]
Tan, Andy S. L. [4 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Social & Behav Sci, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Survey & Qualitat Methods Core, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
[4] Univ Penn, Annenberg Sch Commun, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] Mass General Hosp, Div Gen Acad Pediat, Boston, MA USA
[6] MGH Tobacco Res & Treatment Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[7] Amer Acad Pediat Julius B Richmond Ctr, Itasca, IL USA
[8] Univ Penn, Leonard Davis Inst Hlth Econ, Philadelphia, PA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Schools; Vaping; Tobacco; Adolescent; TOBACCO; PREVENTION; SUSPENSION; STUDENTS; SMOKING; YOUTH; STATE;
D O I
10.1093/tbm/ibad012
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
We assessed vaping behaviors, environments, COVID-19 influences, and barriers and facilitators of existing approaches that address adolescent vaping in Massachusetts middle and high schools. Findings from this study will provide considerations for individual schools or districts as they advance adolescent vaping prevention and treatment efforts. We analyzed 310 open-ended comments from Massachusetts school administrators who completed a survey between November 2020 and January 2021. Further, we analyzed nine semi-structured interviews with administrators (e.g., principals, vice principals, school nurses) from Massachusetts school systems (n = 6) and school-based anti-tobacco advocates (n = 3); interviews took place between May and December 2021. Informed by Green's PRECEDE model, we conducted a framework analysis using deductive codes based on the model constructs (enabling, reinforcing, and predisposing factors) and inductive codes of key themes emerging from the interviews. Challenges to addressing adolescent vaping included staff capacity, funding, and lack of mental health and counseling supports. The COVID-19 pandemic was a major barrier to conducting usual in-person vaping programs, but also reduced student vaping at school due to new social distancing practices and bathroom use policies. Facilitators of vaping interventions included peer-led initiatives and parental involvement. Participants discussed the importance of educating adolescents on the harms of vaping and the move toward alternatives-to-suspension programs rather than disciplinary action. School-based anti-vaping program implementers-such as school districts, state departments of education, or local health departments-will need to leverage facilitators such as peer-led initiatives, alternatives-to-suspension approaches, and parental involvement, to increase the potential impact of these programs. This qualitative analysis assessed vaping behaviors, environments, COVID-19 influences, and barriers and facilitators of existing approaches that address adolescent vaping in Massachusetts middle and high schools. Findings from this study provide considerations for schools as they advance adolescent vaping prevention and treatment efforts, such as incorporating peer-led initiatives, alternatives-to-suspension, and parental involvement. Lay Summary The purpose of this study was to understand challenges that school administrators faced in their approaches to address adolescent vaping in Massachusetts middle and high schools. We analyzed open-ended comments from Massachusetts school administrators who completed a survey between November 2020 and January 2021. Further, we analyzed nine interviews with administrators (e.g., principals, vice principals, school nurses) from Massachusetts school systems (n = 6) and school-based anti-tobacco advocates (n = 3); interviews took place between May and December 2021. We found that challenges to addressing adolescent vaping included school personnel capacity, funding, and lack of mental health and counseling supports. The COVID-19 pandemic was a major barrier to conducting usual in-person vaping programs, but also reduced student vaping at school due to new social distancing practices and bathroom use policies. Successful approaches included peer-led initiatives and parental involvement, and participants discussed the importance of educating adolescents on the harms of vaping. Based on our findings, school-based anti-vaping program practitioners-such as school districts, state departments of education, or local health departments-should leverage peer-led initiatives, alternatives-to-suspension approaches, and parental involvement, to increase the potential impact of adolescent vaping prevention and treatment efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:589 / 600
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Perceived Barriers and Facilitators to School Social Work Practice: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Teasley, Martell
    Canifield, James P.
    Archuleta, Adrian J.
    Crutchfield, Jandel
    Chavis, Annie McCullough
    [J]. CHILDREN & SCHOOLS, 2012, 34 (03) : 145 - 153
  • [2] The influence of institutional characteristics on implementing school-based universal addiction prevention: a Hungarian mixed-methods nationwide study on the state of implementation, barriers, and facilitators
    Arva, Dorottya
    Voko, Zoltan
    Sapi, Maria
    Cselko, Zsuzsa
    Rakosy, Zsuzsa
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2024, 8
  • [3] Facilitators and barriers to blood pressure telemonitoring: A mixed-methods study
    Eze, Chinwe E.
    Dorsch, Michael P.
    Coe, Antoinette B.
    Lester, Corey A.
    Buis, Lorraine R.
    Farris, Karen B.
    [J]. DIGITAL HEALTH, 2023, 9
  • [4] A Mixed-Methods Study on the Barriers and Facilitators of Telemedicine for Newborn Resuscitation
    Fang, Jennifer L.
    Asiedu, Gladys B.
    Harris, Ann M.
    Carroll, Katherine
    Colby, Christopher E.
    [J]. TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH, 2018, 24 (10) : 811 - 817
  • [5] Stakeholders' perspectives on barriers to and facilitators of school-based HPV vaccination in the context of COVID-19 pandemic-related disruption: a qualitative mixed methods study
    Khan, Amal
    Abonyi, Sylvia
    Neudorf, Cory
    Galea, Sandro
    Ahmed, Shahid
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE STUDIES ON HEALTH AND WELL-BEING, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [6] Student perspectives on school-based social workers: a mixed-methods study
    Bennett, C. Verity
    Roberts, Louisa M.
    Smith, Phil
    Meindl, Melissa
    Pallmann, Philip
    Lugg-Widger, Fiona
    Schroeder, Elizabeth-Ann
    Adara, Linda
    Munnery, Kim
    Meister, Lena
    Ayayo, Sharon
    Rawlinson, Sarah
    Forrester, Donald
    Petrou, Stavros
    White, James
    Westlake, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHILDRENS SERVICES, 2024,
  • [7] Student perspectives on asthma management in schools: a mixed-methods study examining experiences, facilitators, and barriers to care
    Naman, Julia
    Press, Valerie G.
    Vaughn, Dagny
    Hull, Ashley
    Erwin, Kim
    Volerman, Anna
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASTHMA, 2019, 56 (12) : 1294 - 1305
  • [8] A Mixed-Methods Evaluation of School-Based Active Living Programs
    McCreary, Linda L.
    Park, Chang G.
    Gomez, Lucy
    Peterson, Serena
    Pino, David
    McElmurry, Beverly J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 43 (05) : S395 - S398
  • [9] Identifying barriers and facilitators to implementing mindfulness-based programmes into schools: A mixed methods study
    Nguyen, Dong
    Kleeman, Nicholas J.
    Yager, Zali
    Parker, Alexandra G.
    Shean, Mandie B.
    Jefferies, Willow
    Wilson-Evered, Elisabeth
    Pucinischi, Christopher P.
    Pascoe, Michaela C.
    [J]. APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-HEALTH AND WELL BEING, 2022, 14 (04) : 1172 - 1188
  • [10] LGBTQ Student Health: A Mixed-Methods Study of Unmet Needs in Massachusetts Schools
    Sava, Lauren M.
    Earnshaw, Valerie A.
    Menino, David D.
    Perrotti, Jeff
    Reisner, Sari L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCHOOL HEALTH, 2021, 91 (11) : 894 - 905