A multicenter study of artificial intelligence-aided software for detecting visible clinically significant prostate cancer on mpMRI

被引:3
|
作者
Sun, Zhaonan [1 ]
Wang, Kexin [2 ]
Kong, Zixuan [3 ]
Xing, Zhangli [4 ]
Chen, Yuntian [5 ]
Luo, Ning [3 ]
Yu, Yang [4 ]
Song, Bin [5 ]
Wu, Pengsheng [6 ]
Wang, Xiangpeng [6 ]
Zhang, Xiaodong [1 ]
Wang, Xiaoying [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ First Hosp, Dept Radiol, 8 Xishiku St, Beijing 100034, Peoples R China
[2] Capital Med Univ, Sch Basic Med Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Dalian Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Affiliated Hosp 2, Dalian, Liaoning, Peoples R China
[4] Fujian Med Univ, Dept Radiol, Union Hosp, Fuzhou, Fujian, Peoples R China
[5] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Radiol, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[6] Beijing Smart Tree Med Technol Co Ltd, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Prostatic neoplasms; Deep learning; Diagnosis; Computer-assisted; Magnetic resonance imaging; DATA SYSTEM; MULTIPARAMETRIC MRI; VERSION; DIAGNOSIS; ACCURACY; EFFICIENCY; BIOPSY; INDEX;
D O I
10.1186/s13244-023-01421-w
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background AI-based software may improve the performance of radiologists when detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). This study aims to compare the performance of radiologists in detecting MRI-visible csPCa on MRI with and without AI-based software. Materials and methods In total, 480 multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) images were retrospectively collected from eleven different MR devices, with 349 csPCa lesions in 180 (37.5%) cases. The csPCa areas were annotated based on pathology. Sixteen radiologists from four hospitals participated in reading. Each radiologist was randomly assigned to 30 cases and diagnosed twice. Half cases were interpreted without AI, and the other half were interpreted with AI. After four weeks, the cases were read again in switched mode. The mean diagnostic performance was compared using sensitivity and specificity on lesion level and patient level. The median reading time and diagnostic confidence were assessed. Results On lesion level, AI-aided improved the sensitivity from 40.1% to 59.0% (18.9% increased; 95% confidence interval (CI) [11.5, 26.1]; p <.001). On patient level, AI-aided improved the specificity from 57.7 to 71.7% (14.0% increase, 95% CI [6.4, 21.4]; p <.001) while preserving the sensitivity (88.3% vs. 93.9%, p = 0.06). AI-aided reduced the median reading time of one case by 56.3% from 423 to 185 s (238-s decrease, 95% CI [219, 260]; p <.001), and the median diagnostic confidence score was increased by 10.3% from 3.9 to 4.3 (0.4-score increase, 95% CI [0.3, 0.5]; p <.001). Conclusions AI software improves the performance of radiologists by reducing false positive detection of prostate cancer patients and also improving reading times and diagnostic confidence. Clinical relevance statement This study involves the process of data collection, randomization and crossover reading procedure.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A multicenter study of artificial intelligence-aided software for detecting visible clinically significant prostate cancer on mpMRI
    Zhaonan Sun
    Kexin Wang
    Zixuan Kong
    Zhangli Xing
    Yuntian Chen
    Ning Luo
    Yang Yu
    Bin Song
    Pengsheng Wu
    Xiangpeng Wang
    Xiaodong Zhang
    Xiaoying Wang
    Insights into Imaging, 14
  • [2] Performance of Artificial Intelligence-Aided Diagnosis System for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer with MRI: A Diagnostic Comparison Study
    Jiang, Ke-Wen
    Song, Yang
    Hou, Ying
    Zhi, Rui
    Zhang, Jing
    Bao, Mei-Ling
    Li, Hai
    Yan, Xu
    Xi, Wei
    Zhang, Cheng-Xiu
    Yao, Ye-Feng
    Yang, Guang
    Zhang, Yu-Dong
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2023, 57 (05) : 1352 - 1364
  • [3] Editorial for "Performance of Artificial Intelligence-Aided Diagnosis System for Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer with MRI: A Diagnostic Comparison Study"
    Nather, Julio Cesar
    Muglia, Valdair Francisco
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2023, 57 (05) : 1365 - 1366
  • [4] Artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer based on multimodal data: a multicenter study
    Zhang, Huiyong
    Ji, Jin
    Liu, Zhe
    Lu, Huiru
    Qian, Chong
    Wei, Chunmeng
    Chen, Shaohua
    Lu, Wenhao
    Wang, Chengbang
    Xu, Huan
    Xu, Yalong
    Chen, Xi
    He, Xing
    Wang, Zuheng
    Zhao, Xiaodong
    Cheng, Wen
    Chen, Xingfa
    Pang, Guijian
    Yu, Guopeng
    Gu, Yue
    Jiang, Kangxian
    Xu, Bin
    Chen, Junyi
    Xu, Bin
    Wei, Xuedong
    Chen, Ming
    Chen, Rui
    Cheng, Jiwen
    Wang, Fubo
    BMC MEDICINE, 2023, 21 (01)
  • [5] Artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer based on multimodal data: a multicenter study
    Huiyong Zhang
    Jin Ji
    Zhe Liu
    Huiru Lu
    Chong Qian
    Chunmeng Wei
    Shaohua Chen
    Wenhao Lu
    Chengbang Wang
    Huan Xu
    Yalong Xu
    Xi Chen
    Xing He
    Zuheng Wang
    Xiaodong Zhao
    Wen Cheng
    Xingfa Chen
    Guijian Pang
    Guopeng Yu
    Yue Gu
    Kangxian Jiang
    Bin Xu
    Junyi Chen
    Bin Xu
    Xuedong Wei
    Ming Chen
    Rui Chen
    Jiwen Cheng
    Fubo Wang
    BMC Medicine, 21
  • [6] Using an artificial intelligence model to detect and localize visible clinically significant prostate cancer in prostate magnetic resonance imaging: a multicenter external validation study
    Sun, Zhaonan
    Wang, Kexin
    Wu, Chenchao
    Chen, Yuntian
    Kong, Zixuan
    She, Lilan
    Song, Bin
    Luo, Ning
    Wu, Pengsheng
    Wang, Xiangpeng
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    Wang, Xiaoying
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2024, 14 (01) : 43 - 60
  • [7] Artificial Intelligence-Aided Endoscopy and Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Spadaccini, Marco
    Massimi, Davide
    Mori, Yuichi
    Alfarone, Ludovico
    Fugazza, Alessandro
    Maselli, Roberta
    Sharma, Prateek
    Facciorusso, Antonio
    Hassan, Cesare
    Repici, Alessandro
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (06)
  • [8] Artificial intelligence-aided optical imaging for cancer theranostics
    Xu, Mengze
    Chen, Zhiyi
    Zheng, Junxiao
    Zhao, Qi
    Yuan, Zhen
    SEMINARS IN CANCER BIOLOGY, 2023, 94 : 62 - 80
  • [9] Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of mpMRI and MicroUS for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with previous negative prostate biopsy
    Frego, N.
    Fasulo, V.
    Maffei, D.
    Arena, P.
    Avolio, P. P.
    Chiarelli, G.
    Beatrici, E.
    Sordelli, F.
    De Carne, F.
    Garofano, G.
    Dagnino, F.
    Aljoulani, M.
    Paciotti, M.
    Saita, A. R.
    Lazzeri, M.
    Hurle, R.
    Buffi, N. M.
    Casale, P.
    Lughezzani, G.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2024, 85 : S57 - S57
  • [10] Artificial Intelligence-Aided Diagnosis Software to Identify Highly Suspicious Pulmonary Nodules
    Lv, Jun
    Li, Jianhui
    Liu, Yanzhen
    Zhang, Hong
    Luo, Xiangfeng
    Ren, Min
    Gao, Yufan
    Ma, Yanhe
    Liang, Shuo
    Yang, Yapeng
    Song, Zhenchun
    Gao, Guangming
    Gao, Guozheng
    Jiang, Yusheng
    Li, Ximing
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 11