Validation of quality indicators for evaluating geriatric pharmacotherapy services in primary care: a mixed methods study

被引:2
|
作者
Sato, Noriko [1 ]
Fujita, Kenji [2 ,3 ]
Okada, Hiroshi [4 ]
Kushida, Kazuki [5 ]
Chen, Timothy F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sch Pharm, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Kolling Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Northern Sydney Local Hlth Dist, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[4] Kyoto Univ, Dept Hlth Informat, Sch Publ Hlth, Kyoto, Japan
[5] Showa Pharmaceut Univ, Fac Pharm, Tokyo, Japan
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 03期
关键词
PRIMARY CARE; GERIATRIC MEDICINE; Quality in health care; Health & safety; CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY; PHARMACEUTICAL CARE; OLDER-PEOPLE; INTERVENTIONS; METAANALYSIS; CRITERIA; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066665
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To assess measurement properties of 121 face and content validated quality indicators (QIs) for medication safety in geriatric pharmacotherapy in primary care. Design A mixed methods study: a 6-month observational study in primary care (July-December 2020) and in-depth semistructured online interviews with participants (February-March 2021). Setting Sixty community pharmacies in Japan. Participants Patients aged 75 years and older who were regularly taking six or more prescription medicines for >4 weeks were eligible. The observational study included 457 patients. The interviews were undertaken with 26 community pharmacists, including pharmacy managers and owners. Primary and secondary outcome measures Five measurement properties of QIs (applicability, improvement potential, acceptability, implementation issues and sensitivity to change) were evaluated. A web application was developed for data reporting and data visualisation. Results This study showed that 53 QIs met the measurement properties of applicability, improvement potential, acceptability and implementation issues. Of 53 QIs, 17 also had a high sensitivity to change. Interviews identified eight themes (indicator characteristics, web application, policy, patient, time, competence, pharmacy administration and collaboration) in relation to the consequence of implementation of QIs. Conclusions A set of 121 QIs for geriatric pharmacotherapy was field tested for their five measurement properties. This QI set can be used to identify patients who may benefit from clinician reviews of their medicines. These QIs may be applied at different levels within the healthcare system: patient, pharmacy, regional and national levels. Further mechanisms to automatically collect and report data should be established to facilitate sustainable quality improvement initiatives.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development and consensus testing of quality indicators for geriatric pharmacotherapy in primary care using a modified Delphi study
    Noriko Sato
    Kenji Fujita
    Kazuki Kushida
    Timothy F. Chen
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2022, 44 : 517 - 538
  • [2] Development and consensus testing of quality indicators for geriatric pharmacotherapy in primary care using a modified Delphi study
    Sato, Noriko
    Fujita, Kenji
    Kushida, Kazuki
    Chen, Timothy F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2022, 44 (02) : 517 - 538
  • [3] Person-centred quality indicators for Australian aged care assessment services: a mixed methods study
    Sandra Smith
    Catherine Travers
    Melinda Martin-Khan
    Ivy Webb
    Elizabeth Miller
    Jane Thompson
    Natasha Roberts
    Research Involvement and Engagement, 10 (1)
  • [4] Development of person-centred quality indicators for aged care assessment services in Australia: A mixed methods study
    Smith, Sandra
    Travers, Catherine
    Roberts, Natasha
    Martin-Khan, Melinda
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2024, 27 (01)
  • [5] Evaluating quality indicators for physical therapy in primary care
    Scholte, Marijn
    Neeleman-Van der Steen, Catharina W. M.
    Hendriks, Erik J. M.
    Nijhuis-Van der Sanden, Maria W. G.
    Braspenning, Joze
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2014, 26 (03) : 261 - 270
  • [6] Quality indicators for primary care mental health services
    Shield, T
    Campbell, S
    Rogers, A
    Worrall, A
    Chew-Graham, C
    Gask, L
    QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2003, 12 (02): : 100 - 106
  • [7] Systematic development of quality indicators for skin cancer management in primary care: a mixed-methods study protocol
    Laginha, Bela Ines
    Rapport, Frances
    Smith, Andrea
    Wilkinson, David
    Cust, Anne E.
    Braithwaite, Jeffrey
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (06):
  • [8] Evaluating the Digital Health Experience for Patients in Primary Care: Mixed Methods Study
    Choy, Melinda Ada
    O'Brien, Kathleen
    Barnes, Katelyn
    Sturgiss, Elizabeth Ann
    Rieger, Elizabeth
    Douglas, Kirsty
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2024, 26
  • [9] Developing quality indicators for assessing quality of birth centre care: a mixed- methods study
    Inge C. Boesveld
    Marieke A. A. Hermus
    Hanneke J. de Graaf
    Marit Hitzert
    Karin M. van der Pal-de Bruin
    Raymond G. de Vries
    Arie Franx
    Therese A. Wiegers
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17
  • [10] Developing quality indicators for assessing quality of birth centre care: a mixed- methods study
    Boesveld, Inge C.
    Hermus, Marieke A. A.
    de Graaf, Hanneke J.
    Hitzert, Marit
    van der Pal-de Bruin, Karin M.
    de Vries, Raymond G.
    Franx, Arie
    Wiegers, Therese A.
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2017, 17