From profits to purpose: ESG practices, CEO compensation and institutional ownership

被引:4
|
作者
Nasta, Luigi [1 ]
Magnanelli, Barbara Sveva
Ciaburri, Mirella [2 ]
机构
[1] Luiss Business Sch, Dept Business & Management, Rome, Italy
[2] Roma Tre Univ, Dept Business Studies, Rome, Italy
关键词
ESG practices; CEO compensation; Institutional ownership; Corporate governance; Stakeholder theory; Agency theory; Institutional theory; CORPORATE SOCIAL-RESPONSIBILITY; EXECUTIVE-COMPENSATION; AGENCY PROBLEMS; SHAREHOLDER ACTIVISM; FIRM PERFORMANCE; INVESTORS; GOVERNANCE; INCENTIVES; RISK; INVESTMENTS;
D O I
10.1108/MD-06-2023-0932
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
PurposeBased on stakeholder, agency and institutional theory, this study aims to examine the role of institutional ownership in the relationship between environmental, social and governance practices and CEO compensation.Design/methodology/approachUtilizing a fixed-effect panel regression analysis, this research utilized a panel data approach, analyzing data spanning from 2014 to 2021, focusing on US companies listed on the S&P500 stock market index. The dataset encompassed 219 companies, leading to a total of 1,533 observations.FindingsThe analysis identified that environmental scores significantly impact CEO equity-linked compensation, unlike social and governance scores. Additionally, it was found that institutional ownership acts as a moderating factor in the relationship between the environmental score and CEO equity-linked compensation, as well as the association between the social score and CEO equity-linked compensation. Interestingly, the direction of these moderating effects varied between the two relationships, suggesting a nuanced role of institutional ownership.Originality/valueThis research makes a unique contribution to the field of corporate governance by exploring the relatively understudied area of institutional ownership's influence on the ESG practices-CEO compensation nexus.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 115
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Institutional ownership and CEO compensation: a longitudinal examination
    Khan, R
    Dharwadkar, R
    Brandes, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2005, 58 (08) : 1078 - 1088
  • [2] Differences in CEO compensation under large and small institutional ownership
    Tosun, Onur Kemal
    [J]. EUROPEAN FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 26 (04) : 1031 - 1058
  • [3] An empirical analysis of the impact of large changes in institutional ownership on CEO compensation risk
    Ning Y.
    Hu X.
    Garza-Gomez X.
    [J]. Journal of Economics and Finance, 2015, 39 (1) : 23 - 47
  • [4] Institutional ownership heterogeneity and ESG performance: Evidence from China
    Wang, Yizhi
    Lin, Yongjia
    Fu, Xiaoqing
    Chen, Songhe
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2023, 51
  • [5] CEO compensation and government ownership
    Borisova, Ginka
    Salas, Jesus M.
    Zagorchev, Andrey
    [J]. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2019, 27 (02) : 120 - 143
  • [6] Transient Institutional Ownership and CEO Contracting
    Dikolli, Shane S.
    Kulp, Susan L.
    Sedatole, Karen L.
    [J]. ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2009, 84 (03): : 737 - 770
  • [7] Board Independence, CEO Ownership, and Compensation
    Chung, Hae Jin
    John, Kose
    [J]. ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2017, 46 (04) : 558 - 582
  • [8] Common institutional ownership and corporate ESG performance in China
    Yin, Yikun
    Qian, Yijia
    Wang, Liang
    Lu, Yichun
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 65
  • [9] Company ESG performance and institutional investor ownership preferences
    Wei, Li
    Chengshu, Wu
    [J]. BUSINESS ETHICS THE ENVIRONMENT & RESPONSIBILITY, 2024, 33 (03): : 287 - 307
  • [10] Government controlling ownership and CEO compensation incentives: evidence from China
    Hui, Zhiyang
    Fang, Hongyan
    [J]. APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2023, 55 (31) : 3561 - 3579