HOW DID SPAIN PERFORM IN PISA 2018? NEW ESTIMATES OF CHILDREN'S PISA READING SCORES

被引:0
|
作者
Jerrim, John [1 ,3 ]
Lopez-Agudo, Luis Alejandro [2 ]
Marcenaro-Gutierrez, Oscar David [2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, UCL Inst Educ, Dept Social Sci, London, England
[2] Univ Malaga, Fac Ciencias Econ & Empresariales, Dept Econ Aplicada Estadist & Econometria, Malaga, Spain
[3] UCL, UCL Inst Educ, Dept Social Sci, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, England
关键词
PISA; multiple imputation; international large-scale assessments; reading; 2018; MATHEMATICS; ACHIEVEMENT; LESSONS;
D O I
10.1080/00071005.2023.2258184
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
International large-scale assessments have gained much attention since the beginning of the twenty-first century, influencing education legislation in many countries. This includes Spain, where they have been used by successive governments to justify education policy change. Unfortunately, there was a problem with the PISA 2018 reading scores for this country, meaning the OECD refused to initially release the results. Therefore, in this paper we attempt to estimate the likely PISA 2018 reading scores for Spain, and for each region within. The figure finally published by the OECD for Spain - in terms of reading scores - was 476.5 points, which is between the lower and upper bound of the interval we find (475 to 483 test points in 2018). Additionally, we report some robustness checks for the OCED countries participating in PISA 2018, which show that the difference between the actual scores and the ones we found with the imputation methods are quite close.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 198
页数:22
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] An investigation of data mining classification methods in classifying students according to 2018 PISA reading scores
    Buyukatak, Emrah
    Anil, Duygu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ASSESSMENT TOOLS IN EDUCATION, 2022, 9 (04): : 867 - 882
  • [2] Did the shift to computer-based testing in PISA 2015 affect reading scores? A View from East Asia
    Komatsu, Hikaru
    Rappleye, Jeremy
    COMPARE-A JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE AND INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION, 2017, 47 (04) : 616 - 623
  • [3] How much gold is in the sand? Data mining with Spain's PISA 2015 results
    Asensio Munoz, Inmaculada
    Carpintero Molina, Elvira
    Exposito Casas, Eva
    Lopez Martin, Esther
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE PEDAGOGIA, 2018, 76 (270): : 225 - 245
  • [4] The preschool PISA: A new paradigm of children's assessment in early childhood education
    Sofou, Efstratia
    Jimenez-Ramirez, Magdalena
    EDUCATION POLICY ANALYSIS ARCHIVES, 2020, 28 : 1 - 15
  • [5] How international tests fail to inform policy: The unsolved mystery of Australia's steady decline in PISA scores
    Morsy, Leila
    Khavenson, Tatiana
    Carnoy, Martin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 60 : 60 - 79
  • [6] An SEM Model Based on PISA 2009 in Turkey: How Does the Use of Technology and Self-regulation Activities Predict Reading Scores?
    Bulut, Okan
    Delen, Erhan
    Kaya, Fatih
    12TH INTERNATIONAL EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE - IETC 2012, 2012, 64 : 564 - 573
  • [7] How the ICT Development Level Influences Students' Digital Reading Literacy: A Multi-level Model Comparison Based on PISA 2018 Data
    Deng Fei
    Sun Erjun
    FRONTIERS OF EDUCATION IN CHINA, 2022, 17 (02) : 151 - 180
  • [8] Preschool Attendance, School Starting Age and Cultural-Financial Resources as Predictors of Adolescent's Reading Comprehension: Evidence From PISA 2015 and 2018
    Tekin, Esra Gur
    Pinar, Yunus
    SAGE OPEN, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [9] Editor's Spotlight/Take 5: How Did Orthopaedic Surgeons Perform in the 2018 Centers for Medicaid & Medicare Services Merit-based Incentive Payment System?
    Manner, Paul A.
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2022, 480 (01) : 4 - 7
  • [10] Status of Cardiovascular Health in US Adults and Children Using the American Heart Association's New "Life's Essential 8" Metrics: Prevalence Estimates From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2013 Through 2018
    Lloyd-Jones, Donald M.
    Ning, Hongyan
    Labarthe, Darwin
    Brewer, LaPrincess
    Sharma, Garima
    Rosamond, Wayne
    Foraker, Randi E.
    Black, Terrie
    Grandner, Michael A.
    Allen, Norrina B.
    Anderson, Cheryl
    Lavretsky, Helen
    Perak, Amanda M.
    CIRCULATION, 2022, 146 (11) : 822 - 835