Workplace investigations, the epistemic power of managerialism and the hollowing out of the Norwegian model of co-determination

被引:3
|
作者
Kuldova, Tereza Ostbo [1 ,2 ]
Nordrik, Bitten [1 ]
机构
[1] Oslo Metropolitan Univ, Oslo, Norway
[2] Oslo Metropolitan Univ, Work Res Inst, POB 4, N-0130 Oslo, Norway
来源
CAPITAL AND CLASS | 2024年 / 48卷 / 03期
关键词
co-determination; epistemic power; freedom of speech; regulatory capitalism; whistleblowing; workplace democracy; workplace investigations; STRUGGLES;
D O I
10.1177/03098168231179971
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Workplace investigations are increasingly being used in Norwegian workplaces in both public and private sectors to investigate allegations of misconduct, harassment, blameworthy conditions, and other breaches of the Norwegian Working Environment Act. Workplace investigations are often triggered by complaints submitted through internal organizational whistleblowing and 'speak up' systems. With the EU Whistleblower Directive, ISO 37002:2021 Whistleblowing Management Systems - Guidelines and the ISO/AWI TS 37008 Internal Investigations in Organizations under development, we witness further standardization of whistleblowing systems and investigative procedures within organizations. And yet, these systems have so far received little critical attention. Our in-depth qualitative analysis of 22 such cases within standard employment relationships, informed by extensive literature review, secondary data and case files, has revealed that workplace investigations escalated conflicts, negatively affecting whistleblowers, trade union representatives, safety representatives, and other critical and dissenting voices, and that these systems leave little room for trade union representatives, co-determination or collective approaches to conflict resolution. We argue that this cannot be merely attributed to botched or biased investigations that have failed to follow 'best practice' guidelines. Instead, these are by default inquisitorial processes: the employer funds the investigation, creates the mandate and acts as prosecutor, police and judge in one. We analyse these methods and their epistemic power in light of the increasing privatization and pluralization of policing within the context of regulatory capitalism and the 'criminalization' of compliance, arguing that such methods are an expression of larger phenomena that lead to the progressive hollowing out of co-determination and workplace democracy and justice, in Norway and likely elsewhere.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 488
页数:26
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Youth co-determination in Norwegian sport
    Waldahl, Ragnhild Holmen
    Skille, Eivind A.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORT POLICY AND POLITICS, 2016, 8 (01) : 135 - 150
  • [2] POWER, MOTIVATION AND CO-DETERMINATION
    KOOPMANIWEMA, AM
    [J]. NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, 1983, 19 (02): : 199 - 204
  • [3] Rethinking education for democracy: a study of co-determination in a Norwegian school
    Mageroy, Solveig Maria
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION, 2023, 8
  • [4] The co-determination of home and workplace relocation durations using survival copula analysis
    Bostanara, Maryam
    Rashidi, Taha Hossein
    Khan, Nazmul Arefin
    Auld, Joshua
    Ghasri, Milad
    Grazian, Clara
    [J]. COMPUTERS ENVIRONMENT AND URBAN SYSTEMS, 2023, 99
  • [5] CO-DETERMINATION OF INDUSTRIAL COUNCIL IN RENTING OUT COMPANY-OWNED DWELLINGS
    SCHMIDTFUTTERER, W
    BLANK, RH
    [J]. BETRIEB, 1976, 29 (25-2): : 1233 - 1235
  • [6] A Historical Legacy Untouched by Time and Space? The Hollowing-out of the Norwegian Model of Industrial Relations
    Bergene, Ann Cecilie
    Hansen, Per Bonde
    [J]. NORDIC JOURNAL OF WORKING LIFE STUDIES, 2016, 6 (01): : 5 - 24
  • [7] Co-determination - Outdated model or reformative concept for the modern participative society?
    Martens, H
    [J]. SOZIALE WELT-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SOZIALWISSENSCHAFTLICHE FORSCHUNG UND PRAXIS, 1999, 50 (01): : 67 - +
  • [8] Corporate governance with co-determination - a key element of the European social model
    Kluge, Norbert
    [J]. TRANSFER-EUROPEAN REVIEW OF LABOUR AND RESEARCH, 2005, 11 (02) : 163 - 177
  • [9] A Model Code on Co-determination and CSR, The Netherlands: A Bottom-Up Approach
    Lambooy, Tineke
    [J]. EUROPEAN COMPANY LAW, 2011, 8 (2-3): : 74 - 82
  • [10] WEST-GERMAN MODEL OF CO-DETERMINATION UNDER SECTION 8(A)(2) OF NLRA
    WULFF, EB
    [J]. INDIANA LAW JOURNAL, 1976, 51 (03) : 795 - 813