Scoping review protocol: exploration of the barriers and facilitators to the uptake of early postnatal contraception

被引:0
|
作者
Cutter, Judith [1 ]
Cooper, Michelle [2 ]
Sanders, Julia [1 ]
Cannings-John, Rebecca [3 ]
Strange, Heather [3 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Sch Healthcare Sci, Cardiff, Wales
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
[3] Cardiff Univ, Ctr Trials Res, Cardiff, Wales
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2023年 / 13卷 / 10期
关键词
postpartum period; postpartum women; obstetrics; PREVENT UNINTENDED PREGNANCY; POSTPARTUM CONTRACEPTION; INTERPREGNANCY INTERVAL; PERINATAL OUTCOMES; MISSED OPPORTUNITY; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075264
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionIt is well documented that many women do not desire a short interpregnancy interval. Medical societies, government agencies and leaders in the field recommend that contraception should be part of maternity care. Short spaced and unplanned pregnancies increase the chances of mortality and morbidity in the mother and child. The WHO recommends a 24-month interpregnancy interval; however, short pregnancy intervals remain common. The goal of this scoping review will be to explore barriers and facilitators to the uptake of early postnatal contraception. A review of globally published literature relating to the implementation of a postnatal contraception service provision globally will be carried out which will highlight evidence gaps, strengths and weaknesses of studies associated with uptake and known barriers and facilitators to the uptake of early postnatal contraception.Methods and analysisThis scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews. The search strategy aims to locate both published and unpublished studies. An initial limited search of PubMed and CINAHL was undertaken to identify articles on the provision of postnatal contraception. The search strategy will be adapted for each included database CINAHL, SCOPUS, MEDLINE, PROSPERO and COCHRANE from 1 January 1993 to 1 January 2023 and reviewed by two reviewers. The data will be analysed and presented in tables, diagrams and text.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required. This review is a retrospective review of widely and publicly available evidence. The review findings will be disseminated via publication in peer-reviewed journals, as part of a PhD thesis and conference presentation.Scoping review questionWhat are the barriers and facilitators to early postnatal contraception provision and uptake?
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Barriers to and facilitators of paediatric medical device innovation: a scoping review protocol
    Kysh, Lynn
    Zapotoczny, Grzegorz
    Manzanete, Lisa
    Carey, Megan
    Shah, Payal
    Joseph, Francesca
    Kempf, Haley
    Sikder, Abu Taher
    Finkel, Julia
    Thekkedath, Usha
    Toman, Kara
    Koh, Chester J.
    Eskandanian, Kolaleh
    Espinoza, Juan
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (06):
  • [2] Exploration of facilitators and barriers to the regulatory frameworks of dietary and herbal supplements: a scoping review
    Ng, Jeremy Y.
    Kim, Minji
    Suri, Ayush
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2022, 15 (01)
  • [3] Exploration of facilitators and barriers to the regulatory frameworks of dietary and herbal supplements: a scoping review
    Jeremy Y. Ng
    Minji Kim
    Ayush Suri
    [J]. Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice, 15
  • [4] Facilitators and barriers for the delivery and uptake of cervical cancer screening in Indonesia: a scoping review
    Robbers, Gianna Maxi Leila
    Bennett, Linda Rae
    Spagnoletti, Belinda Rina Marie
    Wilopo, Siswanto Agus
    [J]. GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, 2021, 14 (01)
  • [5] Barriers and facilitators of access to maternal services for women with disabilities: scoping review protocol
    Doreen Mheta
    Tivani P. Mashamba-Thompson
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 6
  • [6] Barriers and facilitators of access to maternal services for women with disabilities: scoping review protocol
    Mheta, Doreen
    Mashamba-Thompson, Tivani P.
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, 6
  • [7] Barriers and facilitators to buprenorphine use for opioid agonist treatment: protocol for a scoping review
    Leece, Pamela
    Khorasheh, Triti
    Corace, Kimberly
    Strike, Carol
    Bayoumi, Ahmed M.
    Taha, Sheena
    Marks, Elisabeth
    Pach, Beata
    Ahamad, Keith
    Grennell, Erin
    Holowaty, Melissa
    Manson, Heather
    Straus, Sharon E.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (12):
  • [8] Barriers and facilitators of the uptake of digital health technology in cardiovascular care: a systematic scoping review
    Whitelaw, Sera
    Pellegrini, Danielle M.
    Mamas, A. Mamas
    Cowie, Martin
    Van Spall, Harriette G. C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL - DIGITAL HEALTH, 2021, 2 (01): : 62 - 74
  • [9] Facilitators and barriers of vaccine uptake in patients with autoimune inflammatory rheumatic disease: a scoping review
    Neusser, Silke
    Neumann, Anja
    zur Nieden, Pauline
    Speckemeier, Christian
    Schlierenkamp, Sarah
    Walendzik, Anke
    Karbach, Ute
    Andreica, Ioana
    Vaupel, Kristina
    Baraliakos, Xenofon
    Kiltz, Uta
    [J]. RMD OPEN, 2022, 8 (02):
  • [10] FACILITATORS AND BARRIERS OF VACCINE UPTAKE IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC INFLAMMATORY RHEUMATIC DISEASE: A SCOPING REVIEW
    Neusser, S.
    Neumann, A.
    Speckemeier, C.
    Nieden, P. Zur
    Schlierenkamp, S.
    Walendzik, A.
    Karbach, U.
    Andreica, I.
    Vaupel, K.
    Baraliakos, X.
    Kiltz, U.
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2022, 81 : 1807 - 1807