The role of syntactic structure and verb overlap in spoken sentence production of 4- to 6-year-olds: Evidence from syntactic priming in Mandarin

被引:1
|
作者
Wang Yang [1 ,2 ]
Zhang Linshuang [1 ]
Cui Nannan [1 ]
Wu Yan [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Northeast Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, Changchun 130024, Peoples R China
[2] Xinjiang Normal Univ, Key Lab Mental Dev & Learning Sci, Urumqi 830017, Peoples R China
[3] Jilin Prov Key Lab Cognit Neurosci & Brain Dev, Changchun 130024, Peoples R China
关键词
children; sentence production; abstract priming effect; lexical boost/dependent effect; syntactic structure preference; LANGUAGE-ACQUISITION; ABSTRACT SYNTAX; LEXICAL BOOST; KNOWLEDGE; CHILDREN; REPRESENTATIONS; PERSISTENCE;
D O I
10.3724/SP.J.1041.2023.01608
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The period between the ages of 4 and 6 is crucial for young children to develop their capacity for spoken sentence production. The interplay between syntactic and lexical information in children's sentence production has garnered attention in the field of language acquisition. Recently, experts in Indo-European languages have begun to utilize the priming paradigm to address this question; however, theoretical conflicts remain. Unlike Indo-European languages, Mandarin, as an isolating language, relies on function words and word order instead of morphological changes to express grammar. Some researchers have even proposed that Chinese syntax is a language usage and there is no syntactic structure separate from semantics. Consequently, we intend to evaluate pre-existing theories by scrutinizing the syntactic representation in four-to-six-year-old Mandarin-speaking children. To examine the effects of syntactic structure and verb repetition on the syntactic representation of Chinese in young children, we employed a syntactic priming paradigm with sentence repetition and image description tasks using the particular transitive structures of Chinese (SVO, SbaOV, and SbeiOV) as the corpus. A total of 77 preschool children with an average age of 4.4 years were enrolled in the experiment. The study involved the manipulation of Prime types (SVO, SbaOV, SbeiOV, and baseline) and Verb types (no overlap versus overlap). The dependent variable was the ratio of syntactic choices. The results of the study showed that abstract priming effects are induced by the three syntactic structures, irrespective of whether the verb overlaps or not. Especially, when young children begin a specific sentence pattern, such as an SbaOV structure, they tend to formulate an SbaOV structure in the target sentence rather than an SVO or SbeiOV structure. This implies that the development of syntactic knowledge does not rely on lexical information. Additionally, it is worth mentioning that despite the absence of an increase in priming strength in SbaOV or SbeiOV structures with verb overlap, the probability of older children (5-6 years old) opting for an SOV structure during priming is augmented. This finding implies that the emergence of verb boost effects is influenced by the age of children and their syntactic structural preferences. Moreover, the priming effect of non-preferential structures is more powerful than that of preferential structures regardless of whether the verb overlaps, resulting in a reverse preferential effect. To summarize, the acquisition of syntax in Chinese children aligns with the Implicit Learning Theory, whereby they exhibit abstract priming effects stemming from their anticipation of error estimates. Conversely, the lexical boost effect is determined by their working memory. Simultaneously, this research challenges both the RA-Early and RA-Later syntactic models, which rely on the Residual Activation Theory. We believe that children's syntactic representations may not emerge exclusively from the syntactic structures and node links between verbs. In essence, it is not feasible to induce both abstract priming and lexical reinforcement effects in young children during the early stages of cognitive development. Furthermore, establishing lexical dependency effects before generating abstract representations is not a prerequisite.
引用
收藏
页码:1608 / +
页数:15
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] Bates D, 2018, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:1506.04967
  • [2] Bates D, 2014, Arxiv, DOI [arXiv:1406.5823, DOI 10.48550/ARXIV.1406.5823, 10.48550/arXiv.1406.5823]
  • [3] SYNTACTIC PERSISTENCE IN LANGUAGE PRODUCTION
    BOCK, JK
    [J]. COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 18 (03) : 355 - 387
  • [4] An experimental approach to linguistic representation
    Branigan, Holly P.
    Pickering, Martin J.
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2017, 40
  • [5] What children learn from adults' utterances: An ephemeral lexical boost and persistent syntactic priming in adult-child dialogue
    Branigan, Holly P.
    McLean, Janet F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2016, 91 : 141 - 157
  • [6] Branigan HP, 2005, PROC ANN BUCLD, P109
  • [7] An Introduction to Linear Mixed-Effects Modeling in R
    Brown, Violet A.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN METHODS AND PRACTICES IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 4 (01)
  • [8] The Effects of Animacy and Syntax on Priming: A Developmental Study
    Buckle, Leone
    Lieven, Elena
    Theakston, Anna L.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [9] From usage to grammar: The mind's response to repetition
    Bybee, Joan
    [J]. LANGUAGE, 2006, 82 (04) : 711 - 733
  • [10] Becoming syntactic
    Chang, F
    Dell, GS
    Bock, K
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2006, 113 (02) : 234 - 272