Pain management after robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy

被引:1
|
作者
Rosner, Ann Kristin [1 ]
van der Sluis, Pieter C. [2 ]
Meyer, Lena [1 ]
Wittenmeier, Eva [1 ]
Engelhard, Kristin [1 ]
Grimminger, Peter P. [2 ]
Griemert, Eva-Verena [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Mainz, Dept Anesthesiol, Mainz, Germany
[2] Univ Med Ctr Mainz, Dept Gen Visceral and Transplant Surg, Mainz, Germany
[3] Johannes Gutenberg Univ Mainz, Dept Anesthesiol, Univ Med Ctr, Langenbeckstr 1, D-55131 Mainz, Germany
关键词
Robotic surgery; Esophagectomy; Patient-controlled analgesia; Epidural anesthesia; Pain-management; INTERCOSTAL NERVE BLOCK; REGIONAL ANESTHESIA; SURGERY; COMPLICATIONS; ANALGESIA; OUTCOMES; RECOVERY; CANCER;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13842
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: Adequate pain control after open esophagectomy is associated with reduced com-plications, earlier recovery and higher patient satisfaction. While further developing surgical procedures like robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) it is relevant to adapt postoperative pain management. The primary question of this observational survey was whether one of the two standard treatments, thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) or intravenous patient -controlled analgesia (PCA), is superior for pain control after RAMIE as the optimal pain man-agement for these patients still remains unclear. Use of additional analgesics, changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), postoperative complications and duration of intensive care and hospital stay were also analyzed. Methods: This prospective observational pilot study analyzed 50 patients undergoing RAMIE (postoperative PCA with piritramide or TEA using bupivacaine; each n = 25). Patient reported pain using the numeric rating scale score and differences in FEV1 using a micro spirometer were measured at postoperative day 1, 3 and 7. Additional data of secondary endpoints were collected from patient charts. Results: Key demographics, comorbidity, clinical and operative variables were equivalently distributed. Patients receiving TEA had lower pain scores and a longer-lasting pain relief. Moreover, TEA was an independent predictive variable for reduced length of hospital stay (HR-3.560 (95% CI:-6.838 to-0.282), p = 0.034).Conclusions: Although RAMIE leads to reduced surgical trauma, a less invasive pain therapy with PCA appears to be inferior compared to TEA in case of sufficient postoperative analgesia and length of hospital stay. According to the results of this observational pilot study analgesia with TEA provided better and longer-lasting pain relief compared to PCA. Further randomized controlled trials should be conducted to evaluate the optimal postoperative analgesic treatment for RAMIE.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy
    Schroeder, W.
    Bruns, C. J.
    [J]. CHIRURG, 2019, 90 (01): : 66 - 66
  • [2] Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy
    van Hillegersberg, R.
    Seesing, M. F. J.
    Brenkman, H. J. F.
    Ruurda, J. P.
    [J]. CHIRURG, 2017, 88 : 7 - 11
  • [3] Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy is equivalent to thoracoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy
    Weksler, B.
    Sharma, P.
    Moudgill, N.
    Chojnacki, K. A.
    Rosato, E. L.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2012, 25 (05) : 403 - 409
  • [4] Management of anastomotic leakage after robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy with an intrathoracic anastomosis
    de Groot, Eline M.
    Bronzwaer, Sebastiaan F. C.
    Goense, Lucas
    Kingma, B. Feike
    van der Horst, Sylvia
    van den Berg, Jan Willem
    Ruurda, Jelle P.
    van Hillegersberg, Richard
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2023, 36 (06)
  • [5] Postesophagectomy Diaphragmatic Prolapse after Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (RAMIE)
    Brunner, Stefanie
    Mueller, Dolores T.
    Eckhoff, Jennifer A.
    Lange, Valentin
    Chon, Seung-Hun
    Schmidt, Thomas
    Schroeder, Wolfgang
    Bruns, Christiane J.
    Fuchs, Hans F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (18)
  • [6] Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy. German version
    van Hillegersberg, R.
    Seesing, M. F. J.
    Brenkman, H. J. F.
    Ruurda, J. P.
    [J]. CHIRURG, 2016, 87 (08): : 635 - 642
  • [7] Outcomes of Minimally Invasive and Robot-Assisted Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
    Banks, Kian C.
    Hsu, Diana S.
    Velotta, Jeffrey B.
    [J]. CANCERS, 2022, 14 (15)
  • [8] The surgical anatomy of a (robot-assisted) minimally invasive transcervical esophagectomy
    von Reiterdank, I. C. L. J. Filz
    Defize, I. L.
    de Groot, E. M.
    Wedel, T.
    Grimminger, P. P.
    Egberts, J. H.
    Stein, H.
    Ruurda, J. P.
    van Hillegersberg, R.
    Bleys, R. L. A. W.
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2023, 36 (04)
  • [9] Robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy; [Roboterassistierte minimal-invasive Ösophagektomie]
    van Hillegersberg R.
    Seesing M.F.J.
    Brenkman H.J.F.
    Ruurda J.P.
    [J]. Der Chirurg, 2017, 88 (Suppl 1): : 7 - 11
  • [10] Multicenter Experience in Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy — a Comparison of Hybrid and Totally Robot-Assisted Techniques
    Peter P. Grimminger
    Julia I. Staubitz
    Daniel Perez
    Tarik Ghadban
    Matthias Reeh
    Pasquale Scognamiglio
    Jakob R. Izbicki
    Matthias Biebl
    Hans Fuchs
    Christiane J. Bruns
    Hauke Lang
    Thomas Becker
    Jan-Hendrik Egberts
    [J]. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2021, 25 : 2463 - 2469