Long-Term Follow-up of a Wide-Diameter Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant: 10-Year Experience on Stability, Survival, and Tolerability of an Implant-Abutment Combination

被引:2
|
作者
Teunissen, Emma Margaretha [1 ,4 ]
Caspers, Coosje Jacoba Isabella [1 ]
Vijverberg, Maarten Adriaan [1 ]
Mylanus, Emmanuel Antonius Maria [1 ]
Hol, Myrthe Karianne Sophie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, Donders Ctr Neurosci, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Univ Groningen, Res Sch Behav & Cognit Neurosci, Grad Sch Med Sci, Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen Med Ctr, Dept Otorhinolaryngol, POB 9101, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
BAHI; Bone-anchored hearing implant; Early loading; Hearing loss; Holgers score; Implant stability; Implant survival; ISQ; Soft tissue reaction; Wide-diameter implant; RESONANCE FREQUENCY-ANALYSIS; OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS; CONDUCTION HEARING; PERCUTANEOUS IMPLANTS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; BAHA IMPLANT; MULTICENTER; SYSTEM; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1097/MAO.0000000000003763
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
ObjectiveTo compare stability, survival, and soft tissue reactions between a wide-diameter (test) and previous-generation small-diameter (control) bone-anchored hearing implant and to ascertain the safety of loading the test implant 3 weeks after surgery, at a long-term follow-up of 10 years.Study DesignThis study is a continuation of two previously completed, multicenter, randomized, controlled trials and consisted of one to two additional follow-up visits until 10 years after surgery.PatientsFifty-one of the 72 participants from the previous trials were included. Patients received a test or control implant. All control implants were loaded 6 weeks after surgery (group A). Test implants were loaded 3 (group B) or 6 weeks (group C) after surgery.ResultsThe test implant showed significantly higher implant stability quotient (ISQ) values than the control implant throughout the 10-year follow-up. At 10 years, the mean ISQ-high values for both implants were higher than at the first follow-up visit. No significant differences in change of ISQ-high from baseline to 10 years were noticed between both implants and loading groups. Soft tissue reactions were rarely seen. At 10-year follow-up, no patients presented with adverse soft tissue reactions. Excluding explantations, the implant survival rate was 78.6% (group A), 100% (group B), and 90.0% (group C).ConclusionsThe test implant showed superior mean ISQ values and significantly better implant survival throughout 10-year follow-up. In addition, the current study concludes that it is safe to load the test implant at 3 weeks after surgery, as long-term results show high ISQ values and good implant survival.
引用
收藏
页码:40 / 46
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A NEW WIDE-DIAMETER BONE-ANCHORED HEARING IMPLANT: PROSPECTIVE 1-YEAR DATA ON COMPLICATIONS, IMPLANT STABILITY, AND SURVIVAL
    Foghsgaard, Soren
    Caye-Thomasen, Per
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2015, 36 (06) : 1123 - 1124
  • [2] A New Wide-Diameter Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant-Prospective 1-Year Data on Complications, Implant Stability, and Survival
    Foghsgaard, Slren
    Caye-Thomasen, Per
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2014, 35 (07) : 1238 - 1241
  • [3] Long-Term Outcomes of a Percutaneous Wide-Diameter Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant: A Clinical Evaluation of More than 800 Implants
    Teunissen, Emma M.
    Caspers, Coosje J. I.
    Vijverberg, Maarten A.
    Pennings, Ronald J. E.
    Mylanus, Emmanuel A. M.
    Hol, Myrthe K. S.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2024, 45 (05) : e435 - e442
  • [4] RESPONSE TO FOGHSGAARD AND CAYE-THOMASEN "A NEW WIDE-DIAMETER BONE-ANCHORED HEARING IMPLANT: PROSPECTIVE 1-YEAR DATA ON COMPLICATIONS, IMPLANT STABILITY, AND SURVIVAL"
    Nelissen, Rik C.
    Mylanus, Emmanuel A. M.
    Hol, Myrthe K. S.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2015, 36 (06) : 1122 - 1123
  • [5] Implant survival rate in bone-anchored hearing aid users: long-term results
    Wallberg, E.
    Granstrom, G.
    Tjellstrom, A.
    Stalfors, J.
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2011, 125 (11): : 1131 - 1135
  • [6] Stability, Survival, and Tolerability of an Auditory Osseointegrated Implant for Bone Conduction Hearing: Long-Term Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial
    den Besten, Christine A.
    Stalfors, Joacim
    Wigren, Stina
    Blechert, Johan Ivarsson
    Flynn, Mark
    Eeg-Olofsson, Mans
    Aggarwal, Rohini
    Green, Kevin
    Nelissen, Rik C.
    Mylanus, Emmanuel A. M.
    Hol, Myrthe K. S.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2016, 37 (08) : 1077 - 1083
  • [7] Wide diameter bone-anchored hearing system implants: a comparison of long-term follow-up data between tissue reduction and tissue preservation techniques
    Martin Reznitsky
    Kirsten Wielandt
    Søren Foghsgaard
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2019, 276 : 349 - 356
  • [8] Wide diameter bone-anchored hearing system implants: a comparison of long-term follow-up data between tissue reduction and tissue preservation techniques
    Reznitsky, Martin
    Wielandt, Kirsten
    Foghsgaard, Soren
    EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2019, 276 (02) : 349 - 356
  • [9] Ten-year experience with percutaneous bone-anchored hearing aids: A 3- to 10-year follow-up - Markham Stouffville Hospital, 1990 to 2000
    Wade, PS
    Halik, JJ
    Werger, JP
    Vosu, LK
    JOURNAL OF OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2002, 31 (02): : 80 - 84
  • [10] Stability, survival, and tolerability of a 4.5-mm-wide bone-anchored hearing implant: 6-month data from a randomized controlled clinical trial
    Rik C. Nelissen
    Christine A. den Besten
    Emmanuel A. M. Mylanus
    Myrthe K. S. Hol
    European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2016, 273 : 105 - 111