Impact of an ultrasensitive Cytomegalovirus quantitative nucleic acid test on Cytomegalovirus detection and therapy in renal transplant recipients

被引:2
|
作者
Beechar, Vivek B. [1 ]
Pouch, Stephanie M. [1 ]
Phadke, Varun K. [1 ]
Karadkhele, Geeta [1 ]
Larsen, Christian P. [2 ]
Woodworth, Michael H. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Div Infect Dis, Atlanta, GA USA
[2] Emory Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Div Transplantat, Atlanta, GA USA
[3] Emory Univ, Sch Med, 100 Woodruff Circle, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CMV; low level DNAemia; renal transplant recipients; INTERNATIONAL STANDARD; VIRAL LOAD; DISEASE; PROPHYLAXIS; RISK; 1ST; DNA;
D O I
10.1111/tid.14219
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection has broad implications for morbidity and mortality in renal transplant recipients (RTR). Routine surveillance for CMV replication with PCR-based quantitative nucleic acid testing (qNAT) assays is standard practice in most transplant centers, but the impact of assay sensitivity on antiviral decision-making and virologic outcomes has not been studied. We investigated the effects of an ultrasensitive CMV qNAT assay on multiple clinical outcomes, including time to detection and duration of CMV DNAemia.Methods: We conducted a single-center cohort study contrasting RTRs monitored with a qNAT with a higher lower limit of quantification (LLOQ >300 IU/mL) with those monitored with a more sensitive qNAT (LLOQ >35 IU/mL). Patients were stratified by donor (D)/recipient (R) CMV serostatus (D+/R-: high risk; any R+: moderate risk). CMV viral load monitoring was performed monthly post transplantation, with the primary outcomes being time to CMV DNAemia and its duration.Results: Total 1382 patients were analyzed from 2014 to 2016 and 2019 to 2021. Moderate-risk RTRs monitored with the more sensitive assay experienced a greater hazard for the development of a first episode of CMV DNAemia (aHR: 1.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.55-2.46) and an average of 24 (95% CI: 16.40-31.98) additional days of DNAemia. There was no difference in CMV end-organ disease or 1-year all-cause mortality between moderate-risk RTRs.Conclusions: The more sensitive assay was associated with earlier detection and extended durations of CMV DNAemia in moderate-risk RTRs, without altering clinical outcomes. These findings inform optimal use of these assays and antiviral stewardship in RTRs.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Detection of cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplant recipients in Korea
    Kahng, KW
    Kang, CM
    Kwak, JY
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1996, 28 (03) : 1507 - 1507
  • [2] Transition from antigenemia to quantitative nucleic acid amplification testing in cytomegalovirus-seropositive kidney transplant recipients receiving preemptive therapy for cytomegalovirus infection
    Mônica Rika Nakamura
    Lúcio R. Requião-Moura
    Roberto Mayer Gallo
    Camila Botelho
    Júlia Taddeo
    Laila Almeida Viana
    Cláudia Rosso Felipe
    José Medina-Pestana
    Hélio Tedesco-Silva
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [3] Transition from antigenemia to quantitative nucleic acid amplification testing in cytomegalovirus-seropositive kidney transplant recipients receiving preemptive therapy for cytomegalovirus infection
    Nakamura, Monica Rika
    Requiao-Moura, Lucio R.
    Gallo, Roberto Mayer
    Botelho, Camila
    Taddeo, Julia
    Viana, Laila Almeida
    Felipe, Claudia Rosso
    Medina-Pestana, Jose
    Tedesco-Silva, Helio
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [4] Diagnostic value of nucleic-acid-sequence-based amplification for the detection of cytomegalovirus infection in renal and liver transplant recipients
    Goossens, VJ
    Blok, MJ
    Christiaans, MHL
    von Hooff, JP
    Sillekens, P
    Höckerstedt, K
    Lautenschlager, I
    Middeldorp, JM
    Bruggeman, CA
    INTERVIROLOGY, 1999, 42 (5-6) : 373 - 381
  • [5] Cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplant recipients
    Carstens, J.
    Andersen, H. K.
    Spencer, E.
    Madsen, M.
    TRANSPLANT INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2006, 8 (04) : 203 - 212
  • [6] Quantitative detection of human cytomegalovirus DNA in lung transplant recipients
    Kotsimbos, ATC
    Sinickas, V
    Glare, EM
    Esmore, DS
    Snell, GI
    Walters, EH
    Williams, TJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1997, 156 (04) : 1241 - 1246
  • [7] THE COST IMPACT OF CYTOMEGALOVIRUS DISEASE IN RENAL-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS
    MCCARTHY, JM
    KARIM, MA
    KRUEGER, H
    KEOWN, PA
    TRANSPLANTATION, 1993, 55 (06) : 1277 - 1282
  • [8] The impact of early cytomegalovirus infection and disease in renal transplant recipients
    Sagedal, S
    Hartmann, A
    Rollag, H
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2005, 11 (07) : 518 - 530
  • [9] Comparison of quantitative PCR and antigenemia in cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplant recipients
    Bordils, A
    Plumed, JS
    Ramos, D
    Beneyto, I
    Mascarós, V
    Molina, JM
    Cordoba, J
    García, J
    Crúz, JM
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 37 (09) : 3756 - 3759
  • [10] Significance of nested PCR and quantitative real time PCR for cytomegalovirus detection in renal transplant recipients
    Kanaan, A
    Cour, I
    Alvarez-Lafuente, R
    Benedicto, M
    Culebras, E
    Prats, D
    Fernández, C
    Picazo, JJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2004, 24 (05) : 455 - 462