Forage economics calculator web tool: A decision support system for forage management

被引:2
|
作者
Subhashree, Srinivasagan N. [1 ,2 ]
Igathinathane, C. [1 ]
Hendrickson, J. [3 ]
Archer, D. [3 ]
Liebig, M. [3 ]
Halvorson, J. [3 ]
Kronberg, S. [3 ]
Toledo, D. [3 ]
Sedivec, K. [4 ]
Peck, D. [5 ]
机构
[1] North Dakota State Univ, Dept Agr & Biosyst Engn, 1221 Albrecht Blvd, Fargo, ND 58102 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[3] USDA ARS, Northern Great Plains Res Lab, 1701 10th Ave SW, Mandan, ND 58554 USA
[4] Cent Grasslands Res Extens Ctr, 4824 48th Ave SE Streeter, Streeter, ND 58483 USA
[5] USDA, Northern Plains Climate Hub, 1701 Ctr Ave, Ft Collins, CO 80526 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Agriculture management; Agricultural economics; Bale collection; Decision support; Farm equipment; Forage; Web tool; BEEF-CATTLE;
D O I
10.1016/j.compag.2023.107775
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Economic analysis of forage production and handling aids in making an educated decision related to growing or buying forage, setting forage prices, and purchasing additional equipment. Manual calculation of economics is highly complex, tedious, and time-consuming. Therefore, a multi-device web-based tool, called the "forage economics calculator web tool"(FECWT) was developed using HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. The tool's interface was designed for a user-friendly experience with easy access to commands set in an easy-to-follow layout. The FECWT uses 29 input variables to generate results "dynamically"for 37 output variables, based either on the supplied default data or with user-provided inputs (imperial or metric units). The tool emphasizes the cost of the bale collection activity performed using tractor or tractor pulling an "automatic bale picker"(ABP), while the cost of other activities (planting, fertilizer & chemical application, harvesting, and baling) are provided as direct inputs. The economic analysis outputs include net return, break-even ratio, payback period, and return on investment. Features of FECWT include the sensitivity of profit to changes in input values, and downloadable reports and charts for record-keeping. Two case studies using farmers' actual field data inputs demonstrated the FECWT's effectiveness, with its generated results corroborating well with farmers' records. The tool allows for "what-if'' scenario analysis related to equipment purchase, effect of forage crop, net-return, and low-inputs scenario for different field areas suggests that an ABP purchase for field areas greater than >= 65 ha (>= 160 ac) could be profitable; alfalfa and corn were the most profitable forage and grain-forage crops, where the grain revenue stream of grain-forage crops easily covers the costs and makes a profit; and a low-inputs scenario (no fertilizers, chemicals, and/or seeds) for forages (alfalfa and grass) decreased the net returns on average by 8.1 times at 50% forage yield potential suggesting the use of all inputs and increased field areas (>= 65 ha) make a better profit in this low-inputs scenario. Potential users of this web tool include farmers, hay producers, custom hay operators, educators, agricultural extension and financial personnel, and others interested in the economics of handling bales.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Drought Calculator: Decision Support Tool for Predicting Forage Growth During Drought
    Dunn, Gale H.
    Gutwein, Megan
    Green, Timothy R.
    Menger, Ashley
    Printz, Jeff
    [J]. RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2013, 66 (05) : 570 - 578
  • [2] A SIMPLE, MICROCOMPUTER MODEL OF RANGELAND FORAGE GROWTH FOR MANAGEMENT DECISION SUPPORT
    BERRY, JS
    HANSON, JD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE, 1991, 4 (04): : 491 - 499
  • [3] The carrot calculator: A decision support tool for carrot crop management
    Reid, JB
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ROOT AND TUBER CROPS: FOOD DOWN UNDER, 2005, (670): : 131 - 136
  • [4] Forage resource management: what decision support tools are available to dairy farmers?
    Battheu-Noirfalise, C.
    Lefevre, A.
    Stilmant, D.
    Hennart, S.
    Decruyenaere, V.
    Froidmont, E.
    [J]. FOURRAGES, 2022, (251): : 39 - 50
  • [5] The Potato Calculator, a decision support system for nitrogen and irrigation management
    Jamieson, PD
    Stone, PJ
    Zyskowski, RF
    Sinton, S
    Martin, RJ
    [J]. DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS IN POTATO PRODUCTION: BRINGING MODELS TO PRACTICE, 2004, : 84 - 99
  • [6] Virtual alfalfa:: A new forage management tool
    Singh, A
    Remphrey, WR
    Mündermann, L
    Prusinkiewicz, PW
    Smith, SR
    [J]. AMERICAN FORAGE AND GRASSLAND COUNCIL, VOL 10, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 10 : 150 - 154
  • [7] Virtual alfalfa:: A new forage management tool
    Singh, A
    Remphrey, WR
    Mündermann, L
    Prusinkiewicz, PW
    Smith, SR
    [J]. AMERICAN FORAGE AND GRASSLAND COUNCIL, VOL 10, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 10 : 6 - 6
  • [8] Forage information system on the World Wide Web
    Hannaway, DB
    Griffith, S
    Hoagland, P
    Fisher, R
    [J]. 1996 AMERICAN FORAGE AND GRASSLAND COUNCIL, PROCEEDINGS: FORAGES - PACIFIC NORTHWEST TO PACIFIC RIM, 1996, 5 : 246 - 246
  • [9] FORAGE - An online system for generating and delivering property-scale decision support information for grazing land and environmental management
    Zhang, Baisen
    Carter, John
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2018, 150 : 302 - 311
  • [10] The M&WNZ ForageMaster®: Decision Support for Forage Selection
    Snow, V. O.
    Knowles, I. M.
    Fraser, T. J.
    McIvor, S.
    Lovatt, S. J.
    Dooley, A. E.
    Finlayson, J. D.
    [J]. MODSIM 2005: INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION: ADVANCES AND APPLICATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT AND DECISION MAKING: ADVANCES AND APPLICATIONS FOR MANAGEMENT AND DECISION MAKING, 2005, : 259 - 265