How do youth choose activities? Assessing the relative importance of the micro-selection mechanisms behind adolescent extracurricular activity participation
被引:7
|
作者:
Schaefer, David R.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Calif Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
Dept Sociol, 3151 Social Sci Plaza, Irvine, CA 92697 USAUniv Calif Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
Schaefer, David R.
[1
,5
]
Khuu, Thoa, V
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Calif Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697 USAUniv Calif Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
Khuu, Thoa, V
[1
]
Rambaran, J. Ashwin
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA
Univ Utrecht, Utrecht, NetherlandsUniv Calif Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
Rambaran, J. Ashwin
[2
,4
]
Rivas-Drake, Deborah
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USAUniv Calif Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
Rivas-Drake, Deborah
[2
]
Umana-Taylor, Adriana J.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Calif Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
Harvard Grad Sch Educ, Cambridge, MA USAUniv Calif Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
Umana-Taylor, Adriana J.
[1
,3
]
机构:
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Harvard Grad Sch Educ, Cambridge, MA USA
[4] Univ Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Dept Sociol, 3151 Social Sci Plaza, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
We investigate the network micro-selection mechanisms responsible for patterns of high school student extracurricular activity (ECA) participation, with a particular focus on those that can lead to ethnoracial segregation. We identify six types of mechanisms by which students select into activities (e.g., peer influence, homophily), which we test using a unique longitudinal dataset that combines student surveys with yearbook data on ECA involvement. These contexts represent two ethnoracially diverse U.S. high schools involving 2403 students and over 200 different activities spanning two school years. Using a stochastic actor-oriented model for two-mode networks, we find support for the hypothesized activity selection mechanisms. Follow-up analyses convey the relative importance of different mechanisms and inform our discussion of how ECA participation patterns develop and possible sources of segregation. Whereas selection is driven by mechanisms that include influence from friends and co-participants and similarity to fellow participants, no single overarching mechanism appears strong enough to fully account for ECA segregation