Are there gender differences in promotion-prevention self-regulatory focus?

被引:1
|
作者
Gutermuth, Dinah [1 ]
Hamstra, Melvyn R. W. [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Exeter, Exeter, England
[2] LEM Lille Econ Management, IESEG Sch Management, UMR 9221, Lille, France
[3] Univ Lille, LEM Lille Econ Management, UMR 9221, Lille, France
[4] LEM Lille Econ Management, CNRS, UMR 9221, Lille, France
[5] IESEG Sch Management, 3 Rue Digue, F-59000 Lille, France
关键词
gender differences; prevention; promotion; regulatory focus; CONSEQUENCES; STEREOTYPES; NEGOTIATION; AVOIDANCE; IMPACT; GIRLS; BOYS; MEN;
D O I
10.1111/bjop.12688
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The purpose of this research is to examine gender differences in promotion/prevention self-regulatory focus, a dispositional motivational orientation with major implications for human functioning. First, a review of literature using social cognitive theory as a framework suggests that, driven by socialization processes, (1) women may on average be more prevention focused than men - meaning more vigilant to maintain a secure status quo, whereas (2) men may on average be more promotion focused than women - meaning more eager to advance to a better situation than their status quo. Second, we provide data to examine these possible gender differences in self-regulatory focus with secondary analyses of (a) our own existing data on dispositional regulatory focus and of (b) a large scale, representative panel study (LISS Survey). The data suggest a highly consistent difference with women being more prevention focused than men, while the difference in promotion focus is much smaller and is only found in European samples. Auxiliary data suggest promotion-focused women hold less traditional gender role beliefs as well as showing that regulatory focus partially explains examples of behavioural differences between men and women. The analysis of gender difference in regulatory focus sheds new light on gender differences and biases already known, and on regulatory focus, and as such opens up many new and important areas of future inquiry.
引用
收藏
页码:306 / 323
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Unfair treatment and self-regulatory focus
    Oyserman, Daphna
    Uskul, Ayse K.
    Yoder, Nicholas
    Nesse, Randy A.
    Williams, David R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 43 (03) : 505 - 512
  • [2] Self-regulatory focus and advertising effectiveness
    Shao, Wei
    Grace, Debra
    Ross, Mitchell
    [J]. MARKETING INTELLIGENCE & PLANNING, 2015, 33 (04) : 612 - 632
  • [3] Differential Gender and Ethnic Differences in Math Performance A Self-Regulatory Perspective
    Keller, Johannes
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PSYCHOLOGIE-JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 220 (03): : 164 - 171
  • [4] Consumer Ethics The Role of Self-Regulatory Focus
    De Bock, Tine
    Van Kenhove, Patrick
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2010, 97 (02) : 241 - 255
  • [5] Consumer Ethics: The Role of Self-Regulatory Focus
    Tine De Bock
    Patrick Van Kenhove
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2010, 97 : 241 - 255
  • [6] SELF-REGULATORY MECHANISMS GOVERNING GENDER DEVELOPMENT
    BUSSEY, K
    BANDURA, A
    [J]. CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1992, 63 (05) : 1236 - 1250
  • [7] Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle
    Higgins, ET
    [J]. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 30, 1998, 30 : 1 - 46
  • [8] Differences in Self-Regulatory Strength as a Function of Self-Construal
    Arsena, Ashley Rae
    Lee, Jaehoon
    Shrum, L. J.
    Zhang, Yinlong
    Row, Joy L.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CONSUMER RESEARCH, VOL XXXVII, 2010, 37 : 750 - 751
  • [9] Assessing gender differences in computer professionals' self-regulatory efficacy concerning information privacy practices
    Kuo, Feng-Yang
    Lin, Cathy S.
    Hsu, Meng-Hsiang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2007, 73 (02) : 145 - 160
  • [10] Assessing Gender Differences in Computer Professionals’ Self-Regulatory Efficacy Concerning Information Privacy Practices
    Feng-Yang Kuo
    Cathy S. Lin
    Meng-Hsiang Hsu
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2007, 73 : 145 - 160