Wavelet determination of magnetohydrodynamic-range power spectral exponents in solar wind turbulence seen by Parker Solar Probe

被引:1
|
作者
Wang, X. [1 ]
Chapman, S. C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Dendy, R. O.
Hnat, B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warwick, Dept Phys, Ctr Fus Space & Astrophys, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[2] Univ Tromso, Dept Math & Stat, N-9037 Tromso, Norway
[3] Int Space Sci Inst, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
关键词
plasmas; magnetohydrodynamics (MHD); turbulence; Sun: heliosphere; solar wind; methods: data analysis; INERTIAL-RANGE; ANISOTROPY; EVOLUTION; INTERMITTENCY; FLUCTUATIONS; SCALES; MODEL;
D O I
10.1051/0004-6361/202346678
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Context. The high Reynolds number solar wind flow provides a natural laboratory for the study of turbulence in situ. Parker Solar Probe samples the solar wind between 0.17AU and 1AU, providing an opportunity to study how turbulence evolves in the expanding solar wind. Aims. We aim to obtain estimates of the scaling exponents and scale breaks of the power spectra of magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) turbulence at su fficient precision to discriminate between Kolmogorov and Iroshnikov-Kraichnan (IK) turbulence, both within each spectrum and across multiple samples at di fferent distances from the Sun and at di fferent plasma beta. Methods. We identified multiple long-duration intervals of uniform solar wind turbulence, sampled by PSP /FIELDS and selected to exclude coherent structures, such as pressure pulses and current sheets, and in which the primary proton population velocity varies by less than 20% of its mean value. The local value of the plasma beta for these datasets spans the range 0:14 < beta < 4. All selected events span spectral scales from the approximately '1/f ' range at low frequencies, through the MHD inertial range (IR) of turbulence, and into the kinetic range, below the ion gyrofrequency. We estimated the power spectral density (PSD) using a discrete Haar wavelet decomposition, which provides accurate estimates of the IR exponents. Results. Within 0.3AU of the Sun, the IR exhibits two distinct ranges of scaling. The inner, high-frequency range has an exponent consistent with that of IK turbulence within uncertainties. The outer, low-frequency range is shallower, with exponents in the range from -1.44 to -1.23. Between 0.3 and 0.5AU, the IR exponents are closer to, but steeper than, that of IK turbulence and do not coincide with the value -3/2 within uncertainties. At distances beyond 0.5AU from the Sun, the exponents are close to, but mostly steeper than, that of Kolmogorov turbulence, -5/3: uncertainties inherent in the observed exponents exclude the value -5 /3. Between these groups of spectra we find examples, at 0.26AU and 0.61AU, of two distinct ranges of scaling within the IR with an inner, high-frequency range with exponents similar to=1:4; and a low-frequency range with exponents close to the Kolmogorov value of -5/3. Conclusions. Since the PSD-estimated scaling exponents are a central predictor in turbulence theories, these results provide new insights into our understanding of the evolution of turbulence in the solar wind.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] The Ion Transition Range of Solar Wind Turbulence in the Inner Heliosphere: Parker Solar Probe Observations
    Huang, S. Y.
    Sahraoui, F.
    Andres, N.
    Hadid, L. Z.
    Yuan, Z. G.
    He, J. S.
    Zhao, J. S.
    Galtier, S.
    Zhang, J.
    Deng, X. H.
    Jiang, K.
    Yu, L.
    Xu, S. B.
    Xiong, Q. Y.
    Wei, Y. Y.
    Dudok de Wit, T.
    Bale, S. D.
    Kasper, J. C.
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS, 2021, 909 (01)
  • [2] Spectral Features in Field-aligned Solar Wind Turbulence from Parker Solar Probe Observations
    Zhao, L-L
    Zank, G. P.
    Adhikari, L.
    Nakanotani, M.
    Telloni, D.
    Carbone, F.
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2020, 898 (02):
  • [3] Cancellation exponents and multifractal scaling laws in the solar wind magnetohydrodynamic turbulence
    Carbone, V
    Bruno, R
    [J]. ANNALES GEOPHYSICAE-ATMOSPHERES HYDROSPHERES AND SPACE SCIENCES, 1996, 14 (08): : 777 - 785
  • [4] Inertial-Range Reconnection in Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence and in the Solar Wind
    Lalescu, Cristian C.
    Shi, Yi-Kang
    Eyink, Gregory L.
    Drivas, Theodore D.
    Vishniac, Ethan T.
    Lazarian, Alexander
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2015, 115 (02)
  • [5] SPECTRAL SCALING LAWS IN MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMIC TURBULENCE SIMULATIONS AND IN THE SOLAR WIND
    Boldyrev, Stanislav
    Perez, Jean Carlos
    Borovsky, Joseph E.
    Podesta, John J.
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS, 2011, 741 (01)
  • [6] Generalized Similarity in Finite Range Solar Wind Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence
    Chapman, S. C.
    Nicol, R. M.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2009, 103 (24)
  • [7] Analysis of Magnetohydrodynamic Perturbations in the Radial-field Solar Wind from Parker Solar Probe Observations
    Zhao, S. Q.
    Yan, Huirong
    Liu, Terry Z.
    Liu, Mingzhe
    Shi, Mijie
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 923 (02):
  • [8] New Observations of Solar Wind 1/f Turbulence Spectrum from Parker Solar Probe
    Huang, Zesen
    Sioulas, Nikos
    Shi, Chen
    Velli, Marco
    Bowen, Trevor
    Davis, Nooshin
    Chandran, B. D. G.
    Matteini, Lorenzo
    Kang, Ning
    Shi, Xiaofei
    Huang, Jia
    Bale, Stuart D.
    Kasper, J. C.
    Larson, Davin E.
    Livi, Roberto
    Whittlesey, P. L.
    Rahmati, Ali
    Paulson, Kristoff
    Stevens, M.
    Case, A. W.
    de Wit, Thierry Dudok
    Malaspina, David M. M.
    Bonnell, J. W.
    Goetz, Keith
    Harvey, Peter R. R.
    MacDowall, Robert J. J.
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS, 2023, 950 (01)
  • [9] Cross-scale Correlations in Imbalanced Solar Wind Turbulence: Parker Solar Probe Observations
    Zhao, G. Q.
    Meyrand, R.
    Feng, H. Q.
    Wu, D. J.
    Kasper, J. C.
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2022, 938 (02):
  • [10] Energy transfer of the solar wind turbulence based on Parker solar probe and other spacecraft observations
    Wu, Honghong
    Tu, Chuanyi
    He, Jiansen
    Wang, Xin
    Yang, Liping
    [J]. PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 2023, 30 (02)