Potential carbon leakage risk: a cross-sector cross-country assessment in the OECD area

被引:3
|
作者
Gabela, J. G. Fournier [1 ]
Freund, F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johann Heinrich von Thunen Inst, Fed Res Inst Rural Areas Forestry & Fisheries, Inst Market Anal, Bundesallee 63, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany
关键词
Unilateral climate policy; Multi-regional input-output (MRIO) analysis; Embodied GHG emissions; Global supply chain; EITE metric; EMISSIONS; ADJUSTMENTS; POLICIES; ETS;
D O I
10.1007/s10584-023-03544-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Achieving climate targets requires more stringent mitigation policies, including the participation of all economic sectors. However, in a fragmented global climate regime, unilateral mitigation policies affecting sectors' production costs increase carbon leakage risk. Carbon leakage implies reducing the competitiveness of domestic sectors without achieving the full mitigation objectives. Under such circumstances, generating information about sectors' vulnerability is essential to increase their acceptance of more stringent climate policies and design anti-leakage mechanisms. Our paper calculates and compares potential carbon leakage risk across sectors and OECD countries under varying climate policy scenarios covering GHG emissions along global supply chains. To measure this risk, we use the emission-intensity and trade-exposure metric and emission data including CO2 and non-CO2 gasses. Our results show that agri-food and transport sectors, usually lagging behind in countries' national climate mitigation policies, could have an even higher carbon leakage risk than energy-intensive industries. Furthermore, we find that this risk can be higher in many downstream sectors compared to directly regulated sectors and is highly heterogenous across OECD countries.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Potential carbon leakage risk: a cross-sector cross-country assessment in the OECD area
    J. G. Fournier Gabela
    F. Freund
    [J]. Climatic Change, 2023, 176
  • [2] Maintaining centralised application systems: a cross-country, cross-sector, cross-platform comparison
    Tan, WG
    Gable, GG
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 1997, 6 (04) : 193 - 207
  • [3] International spillovers and absorptive capacity: A cross-country cross-sector analysis based on patents and citations
    Mancusi, Maria Luisa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 76 (02) : 155 - 165
  • [4] Sectoral cognitive skills, R&D, and productivity: a cross-country cross-sector analysis
    Sasso, Simone
    Ritzen, Jo
    [J]. EDUCATION ECONOMICS, 2019, 27 (01) : 35 - 51
  • [5] The upcoming new elite among children of immigrants: a cross-country and cross-sector comparison INTRODUCTION
    Crul, Maurice
    Keskiner, Elif
    Lelie, Frans
    [J]. ETHNIC AND RACIAL STUDIES, 2017, 40 (02) : 209 - 229
  • [6] Carbon risk and corporate investment: A cross-country evidence
    Dinh Hoang Bach Phan
    Vuong Thao Tran
    Ming, Tee Chwee
    Anh Le
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 46
  • [7] A CROSS-COUNTRY ANALYSIS OF EXPORT PRICES IN OECD COUNTRIES
    Valadkhani, Abbas
    Layton, Allan
    [J]. ECONOMIC PAPERS, 2006, 25 (04): : 331 - 346
  • [8] DRAG AREA OF A CROSS-COUNTRY SKIER
    SPRING, E
    SAVOLAINEN, S
    ERKKILA, J
    HAMALAINEN, T
    PIHKALA, P
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORT BIOMECHANICS, 1988, 4 (02): : 103 - 113
  • [9] Environmental policies and risk finance in the green sector: Cross-country evidence
    Criscuolo, Chiara
    Menon, Carlo
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 83 : 38 - 56
  • [10] A cross-country database for sector investment and capital
    Larson, DF
    Butzer, R
    Mundlak, Y
    Crego, A
    [J]. WORLD BANK ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2000, 14 (02): : 371 - 391