Weighted Sparse Cauchy Nonnegative Matrix Factorization Hyperspectral Unmixing Based on Spatial-Spectral Constraints

被引:1
|
作者
Chen Shanxue [1 ,2 ]
Hu Zhiyuan [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Univ Posts & Telecommun, Sch Commun & Informat Engn, Chongqing 400065, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Educ, Engn Res Ctr Mobile Communicat, Chongqing 400065, Peoples R China
[3] Chongqing Key Lab Mobile Commun Technol, Chongqing 400065, Peoples R China
关键词
remote sensing and sensors; hyper-spectral unmixing; nonnegative matrix factorization; Cauchy loss function; sparse; spatial-spectral constraints; COMPONENT ANALYSIS; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.3788/LOP213319
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Traditional nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF) applied to hyper-spectral unmixing is susceptible to the interference of pretzel noise, resulting in unmixing failure. Previous sparse unmixing requires determining the optimal feature subset in a spatial domain involving more dispersed information and susceptibility to noise. The weighted sparse Cauchy-nonnegative matrix factorization (SSCNMF) algorithm based on the spatial-spectral constraints is proposed to solve these problems. First, the Cauchy loss-function-based NMF model, which exhibits excellent robustness in suppressing extreme outliers, is applied. Second, an adaptive sparse weighting factor is introduced to improve the sparsity of the abundance matrix. A spatial-spectral constraint term is added, in which the spectral factor is used to measure the sparsity of abundance among different spectra. The spatial factor exploits the smoothness of the spatial domain of abundance to improve the extraction efficiency of data features. Simulation experiments were conducted on simulated and actual datasets. The effectiveness and excellent anti-noise performance of the SSCNMF algorithm are verified by comparing it with some classical hyper-spectral unmixing algorithms.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] ADAMS JB, 1986, J GEOPHYS RES-SOLID, V91, P8098, DOI 10.1029/JB091iB08p08098
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2004, Convex Optimization
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2016, SENSING, V37, P3870
  • [4] Hyperspectral Unmixing Overview: Geometrical, Statistical, and Sparse Regression-Based Approaches
    Bioucas-Dias, Jose M.
    Plaza, Antonio
    Dobigeon, Nicolas
    Parente, Mario
    Du, Qian
    Gader, Paul
    Chanussot, Jocelyn
    [J]. IEEE JOURNAL OF SELECTED TOPICS IN APPLIED EARTH OBSERVATIONS AND REMOTE SENSING, 2012, 5 (02) : 354 - 379
  • [5] Dias J, 2007, IMAGE PROCESSING REM, P149
  • [6] Truncated Cauchy Non-Negative Matrix Factorization
    Guan, Naiyang
    Liu, Tongliang
    Zhang, Yangmuzi
    Tao, Dacheng
    Davis, Larry S.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2019, 41 (01) : 246 - 259
  • [7] Fully Constrained Least Squares Spectral Unmixing by Simplex Projection
    Heylen, Rob
    Burazerovic, Dzevdet
    Scheunders, Paul
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2011, 49 (11): : 4112 - 4122
  • [8] Optimal linear spectral unmixing
    Hu, YH
    Lee, HB
    Scarpace, FL
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 1999, 37 (01): : 639 - 644
  • [9] Spectral-Spatial Robust Nonnegative Matrix Factorization for Hyperspectral Unmixing
    Huang, Risheng
    Li, Xiaorun
    Zhao, Liaoying
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2019, 57 (10): : 8235 - 8254
  • [10] Maximum Likelihood Estimation Based Nonnegative Matrix Factorization for Hyperspectral Unmixing
    Jiang, Qin
    Dong, Yifei
    Peng, Jiangtao
    Yan, Mei
    Sun, Yi
    [J]. REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (13)