Non-indicated vitamin B12- and D-testing among Dutch hospital clinicians: a cross-sectional analysis in data registries

被引:0
|
作者
Muskens, Joris L. J. M. [1 ]
Kool, Rudolf Bertijn [1 ]
Westert, Gert P. [1 ]
Zaal, Maarten [2 ]
Muller, Hein [2 ]
Atsma, Femke [1 ]
van Dulmen, S. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, IQ Hlth Sci Dept, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Dutch Hosp Data, Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 02期
关键词
Quality in health care; Hospitals; Public; Clinical Decision-Making; Retrospective Studies; HEALTH-CARE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075241
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To assess the extent of non-indicated vitamin B-12- and D-testing among Dutch clinicians and its variation among hospitals. Design Cross-sectional study using registration data from 2015 to 2019. Participants Patients aged between 18 and 70 years who received a vitamin B-12- or D-test. Primary and secondary outcome measures The proportion of non-indicated vitamin B-12- and D-testing among Dutch clinicians and its variation between hospitals (n=68) over 2015-2019. Results Between 2015 and 2019, at least 79.0% of all vitamin B-12-tests and 82.0% of vitamin D-tests lacked a clear indication. The number of vitamin B-12-tests increased by 2.0% over the examined period, while the number of D-tests increased by 12.2%. The proportion of the unexplained variation in non-indicated vitamin B-12- and D-tests that can be ascribed to differences between hospitals remained low. Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged between 0.072 and 0.085 and 0.081 and 0.096 for non-indicated vitamin B-12- and D-tests, respectively. The included casemix variables patient age, gender, socioeconomic status and hospital size only accounted for a small part of the unexplained variation in non-indicated testing. Additionally, a significant correlation was observed in non-indicated vitamin B-12- and D-testing among the included hospitals. Conclusion Hospital clinicians order vitamin B-12- and D-tests without a clear indication on a large scale. Only a small proportion of the unexplained variation could be attributed to differences between hospitals.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 5 条
  • [1] Cognitive function and vitamin B12 and D among community-dwelling elders: A cross-sectional study
    Vinueza Veloz, Andres Fernando
    Carpio Arias, Tannia Valeria
    Vargas Mejia, Jenifer Sthefania
    Tapia Veloz, Estephany Carolina
    Piedra Andrade, Jefferson Santiago
    Nicolalde Cifuentes, Tomas Marcelo
    Heredia Aguirre, Susana Isabel
    Veloz, Maria Fernanda Vinueza
    CLINICAL NUTRITION ESPEN, 2022, 50 : 270 - 276
  • [2] Intense Testing and Use of Vitamin D Supplements Leads to Slow Improvement in Vitamin D Adequacy Rates: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Real-World Data
    Paparodis, Rodis D.
    Bantouna, Dimitra
    Karvounis, Evangelos
    Zoupas, Ioannis
    Livadas, Sarantis
    Angelopoulos, Nicholas
    Imam, Shahnawaz
    Papadimitriou, Dimitrios T.
    Jaume, Juan C.
    NUTRIENTS, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [3] Correlation between serum vitamin B12, vitamin D, and suboptimal semen parameters in male infertility: A hospital-based cross-sectional study
    Kumar, Navneet
    Jadhao, Anand Gautam
    Yadav, Ravi Ramkishan
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY MEDICINE AND PRIMARY CARE, 2024, 13 (11) : 5171 - 5176
  • [4] Underuse of Indicated Medications Among Physically Frail Older US Veterans at the Time of Hospital Discharge: Results of a Cross-Sectional Analysis of Data From the Geriatric Evaluation and Management Drug Study
    Wright, Rollin M.
    Sloane, Richard
    Pieper, Carl F.
    Ruby-Scelsi, Christine
    Twersky, Jack
    Schmader, Kenneth E.
    Hanlon, Joseph T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2009, 7 (05): : 271 - 280
  • [5] Vitamin B-12 status and neurologic function in older people: a cross-sectional analysis of baseline trial data from the Older People and Enhanced Neurological Function (OPEN) study
    Miles, Lisa M.
    Allen, Elizabeth
    Mills, Kerry
    Clarke, Robert
    Uauy, Ricardo
    Dangour, Alan D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2016, 104 (03): : 790 - 796