A Multi-Hazard Risk Framework to Stress-Test Water Supply Systems to Climate-Related Disruptions

被引:6
|
作者
Becher, Olivia [1 ]
Pant, Raghav [1 ]
Verschuur, Jasper [1 ]
Mandal, Arpita [2 ]
Paltan, Homero [3 ]
Lawless, Mark [4 ]
Raven, Emma [4 ]
Hall, Jim [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Environm Change Inst, Oxford, England
[2] Univ West Indies, Dept Geog & Geol, Kingston, Jamaica
[3] World Bank, 1818 H St NW, Washington, DC 20433 USA
[4] JBA Risk Management, Skipton, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
drinking water; climate extremes; infrastructure; climate change; DROUGHT; IMPACT; MODEL; VULNERABILITY; ROBUSTNESS; RESILIENCE; EVENTS;
D O I
10.1029/2022EF002946
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Water utilities' supply systems are vulnerable to several climate-related hazards, including droughts, floods and cyclones. Here we propose a generally applicable framework for conducting multi-hazard risk assessments of water supply systems and use it to quantify the impact of present and future climate extremes on the national water supply network in Jamaica. The proposed framework involves stress-testing a model of the system with a large set of spatially coherent drought, cyclone and pluvial and fluvial flood events to calculate the number of water users whose supplies would be disrupted during an event, that is, the Customer disruption days (CDD). We estimate the total multi-hazard annual expected disruption to be approximately 5 days per year per utility customer under present conditions. This is increased by a factor of between 2 and 2.5 when end-of-century climate scenarios are propagated through the model. Our analysis shows that more high probability drought events lead to greater CDD compared with asset damage events. However, extreme asset damage events, despite manifesting over shorter timescales (days) compared to drought events (months), can lead to more widespread CDD. This quantified risk framework would allow utility managers to compare the risk of both asset damage- and water shortage-induced disruptions via a common, decision-relevant metric. However, applications to other utilities would require tailored hazard modeling approaches. The proposed risk assessment is intended to inform prioritization of infrastructure investments, ranging from asset protection to drought mitigation projects, with the goal of enhancing water supply resilience in the face of a changing climate.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Multi-hazard assessment of climate-related hazards for European coastal cities
    Laino, Emilio
    Iglesias, Gregorio
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 357
  • [2] Mountain specific multi-hazard risk management framework (MSMRMF): Assessment and mitigation of multi-hazard and climate change risk in the Indian Himalayan Region
    Sekhri, Simran
    Kumar, Praveen
    Fuerst, Christine
    Pandey, Rajiv
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2020, 118
  • [3] A multi-hazard risk assessment methodology, stress test framework and decision support tool for transport infrastructure networks
    Clarke, Julie
    Obrien, Eugene
    TRANSPORT RESEARCH ARENA TRA2016, 2016, 14 : 1355 - 1363
  • [4] A novel multi-hazard risk assessment framework for coastal cities under climate change
    Laino, Emilio
    Toledo, Ignacio
    Aragones, Luis
    Iglesias, Gregorio
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 954
  • [5] Development of Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment Model for Agricultural Water Supply and Distribution Systems Using Bayesian Network
    Bozorgi, Atiyeh
    Roozbahani, Abbas
    Shahdany, Seied Mehdy Hashemy
    Abbassi, Rouzbeh
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2021, 35 (10) : 3139 - 3159
  • [6] Development of Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment Model for Agricultural Water Supply and Distribution Systems Using Bayesian Network
    Atiyeh Bozorgi
    Abbas Roozbahani
    Seied Mehdy Hashemy Shahdany
    Rouzbeh Abbassi
    Water Resources Management, 2021, 35 : 3139 - 3159
  • [7] Development of Multi-Hazard Risk Assessment Model for Agricultural Water Supply and Distribution Systems Using Bayesian Network
    Bozorgi, Atiyeh
    Roozbahani, Abbas
    Hashemy Shahdany, Seied Mehdy
    Abbassi, Rouzbeh
    Water Resources Management, 2021, 35 (10): : 3139 - 3159
  • [8] Multi-hazard risk assessment for lifelines part 2 - Case study for the Portland, Oregon water supply system
    Ballantyne, D
    Kessler, D
    Elliott, W
    Scawthorn, C
    OPTIMIZING POST-EARTHQUAKE LIFELINE SYSTEM RELIABILITY, 1999, (16): : 960 - 969
  • [9] A framework to assess multi-hazard physical climate risk for power generation projects from publicly-accessible sources
    Tianyi Luo
    Yan Cheng
    James Falzon
    Julian Kölbel
    Lihuan Zhou
    Yili Wu
    Amir Habchi
    Communications Earth & Environment, 4
  • [10] A framework to assess multi-hazard physical climate risk for power generation projects from publicly-accessible sources
    Luo, Tianyi
    Cheng, Yan
    Falzon, James
    Kölbel, Julian
    Zhou, Lihuan
    Wu, Yili
    Habchi, Amir
    COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 4 (01):