Response to Prone Position in COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 Patients with Severe ARDS Supported by vvECMO

被引:1
|
作者
Textoris, Laura [1 ]
Gragueb-Chatti, Ines [1 ]
Daviet, Florence [1 ]
Valera, Sabine [1 ]
Sanz, Celine [1 ]
Papazian, Laurent [1 ,2 ]
Forel, Jean-Marie [1 ,3 ]
Hraiech, Sami [1 ,3 ]
Roch, Antoine [1 ,3 ]
Guervilly, Christophe [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Hop Nord Marseille, AP HM, Serv Medecine Intens Reanimat, F-13015 Marseille, France
[2] Ctr Hosp Bastia, Serv Reanimat, 604 Chemin Falconaja, F-20600 Bastia, France
[3] Aix Marseille Univ, Ctr Etud & Rech Serv St & Qual, vie EA 3279, F-13005 Marseille, France
关键词
COVID-19; severe ARDS; venovenous ECMO; prone position; respiratory system compliance; EXTRACORPOREAL MEMBRANE-OXYGENATION; RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS-SYNDROME; GAS-EXCHANGE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.3390/jcm12123918
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: For moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), lung-protective ventilation combined with prolonged and repeated prone position (PP) is recommended. For the most severe patients for whom this strategy failed, venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vv-ECMO) allows a reduction in ventilation-induced lung injury and improves survival. Some aggregated data have suggested a benefit regarding survival in pursuing PP during vv-ECMO. The combination of PP and vv-ECMO has been also documented in COVID-19 studies, although there is scarce evidence concerning respiratory mechanics and gas exchange response. The main objective was to compare the physiological response of the first PP during vv-ECMO in two cohorts of patients (COVID-19-related ARDS and non-COVID-19 ARDS) regarding respiratory system compliance (C-RS) and oxygenation changes. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, and ambispective cohort study in the ECMO center of Marseille, France. ECMO was indicated according to the EOLIA trial criteria. Results: A total of 85 patients were included, 60 in the non-COVID-19 ARDS group and 25 in the COVID-19-related ARDS group. Lung injuries of the COVID-19 cohort exhibited significantly higher severity with a lower C-RS at baseline. Concerning the main objective, the first PP during vv-ECMO was not associated with a change in C-RS or other variation in respiratory mechanic variables in both cohorts. By contrast, oxygenation was improved only in the non-COVID-19 ARDS group after a return to the supine position. Mean arterial pressure was higher during PP as compared with a return to the supine position in the COVID-19 group. Conclusion: We found distinct physiological responses to the first PP in vv-ECMO-supported ARDS patients according to the COVID-19 etiology. This could be due to higher severity at baseline or specificity of the disease. Further investigations are warranted.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] PRONE POSITIONING IN COVID-19 VS NON-COVID-19 ARDS IN THE EARLY COVID-19 PANDEMIC
    Lieberman, Allyson E.
    Iglesias, Lilian
    Kohn, Rachel
    Scott, Steeania
    Fuchs, Barry D.
    Weissman, Gary
    Kerlin, Meeta P.
    [J]. CHEST, 2022, 162 (04) : 908A - 908A
  • [2] COMPARISON OF SEVERE ARDS MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOMES IN COVID-19 AND NON-COVID-19 PATIENTS
    Palmer, Chris
    Dieffenderfer, Brian
    Buckman, Sara
    Kerby, Paul
    Despotovic, Vladimir
    Konzen, Lisa
    White, Jason
    Meyer, Shelley
    Bertrand, Jill
    Reda, Patricia
    Boyle, Walter
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 49 (01) : 59 - 59
  • [3] Time to Extubation in COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 ARDS
    Dechert, Ronald E.
    [J]. RESPIRATORY CARE, 2023, 68 (10) : 1475 - 1476
  • [4] COMPARING VASCULAR ACCESS AND COMPLICATIONS IN PATIENTS WITH COVID-19 AND NON-COVID-19 ARDS
    Bzeih, Rami
    Mayo, MacKenzie
    Csernak, Ibolya
    Tassava, Twylla
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 50 (01) : 103 - 103
  • [5] RESPIRATORY PHYSIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS AND OUTCOMES OF PATIENTS WITH COVID-19 ARDS AND NON-COVID-19 ARDS UNDERGOING ECMO
    Federbush, M.
    Hasan, Z.
    Rodriguez, G.
    Varrone, M.
    Mundanchira, G.
    Manetta, F.
    Narasimhan, M.
    [J]. CHEST, 2022, 161 (06) : 502A - 502A
  • [6] PULMONARY FIBROSIS IN PATIENTS SURVIVING ARDS PNEUMONIA OF COVID-19 AND NON-COVID-19 ETIOLOGIES
    Sturgill, Jamie
    Mayer, Kirby
    Kalema, Anna
    Dave, Kinjal
    Mora, Stephanie
    Kalantar, Alborz
    Montgomery-Yates, Ashley
    Morris, Peter
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 51 (01) : 466 - 466
  • [7] IMPACT OF TRACHEOSTOMY TIMING ON OUTCOMES IN COVID-19 AND NON-COVID-19 ARDS
    Geriani, D.
    Egan, J.
    Moore, S.
    [J]. CHEST, 2022, 161 (06) : 415A - 415A
  • [8] Comparison of Respiratory and. Hemodynamic Parameters of COVID-19 and Non-COVID-19 ARDS Patients
    Asar, Sinan
    Acicbe, Ozlem
    Sabaz, Mehmet S.
    Tontu, Furkan
    Canan, Emral
    Cukurova, Zafer
    Cakar, Nahit
    [J]. INDIAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 25 (06) : 703 - 707
  • [9] Awake prone position reduces work of breathing in patients with COVID-19 ARDS supported by CPAP
    Chiumello, Davide
    Chiodaroli, Elena
    Coppola, Silvia
    Borlino, Simone Cappio
    Granata, Claudia
    Pitimada, Matteo
    Garcia, Pedro David Wendel
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTENSIVE CARE, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [10] Higher procoagulatory potential but lower DIC score in COVID-19 ARDS patients compared to non-COVID-19 ARDS patients
    Hoechter, D. J.
    Becker-Pennrich, A.
    Langrehr, J.
    Bruegel, M.
    Zwissler, B.
    Schaefer, S.
    Spannagl, M.
    Hinske, L. C.
    Zoller, M.
    [J]. THROMBOSIS RESEARCH, 2020, 196 : 186 - 192