3D bioprinting and scaffold-free strategies for fabrication of multi-cellular tissues or organoids

被引:3
|
作者
Li, Haoyu [1 ]
Zhou, Huixing [1 ]
Xu, Chongwen [1 ]
Wei, Yen [2 ,3 ]
Tang, Xiuying [4 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Civil Engn & Architecture, Sch Mech Elect & Vehicle Engn, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Minist Educ, Dept Chem, Key Lab Bioorgan Phosphorus Chem & Chem Biol, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Tsinghua Ctr Frontier Polymer Res, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[4] China Agr Univ, Coll Engn, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
关键词
Multi-cellular tissues or organoids (MTOs); Biofabrication strategies; Scaffold-based and scaffold-free strategies; 3D bioprinting; Bioassembly; BioMicroMesh; MICROTISSUES; MODEL; BONE;
D O I
10.36922/ijb.0135
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The biofabrication of multi-cellular tissues or organoids (MTOs) has been challenging in regenerative medicine for decades. Currently, two primary technological approaches are being explored: scaffold-based strategies utilizing three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting techniques and scaffold-free strategies employing bioassembly techniques. 3D bioprinting techniques include jetting-based, extrusion-based, and vat photopolymerization-based methods, and bioassembly techniques include Kenzan, fluid-based manipulation and microfluid, bioprinting-assisted tissue emergence, and aspiration-assisted technology methods. Scaffold-based strategies primarily concentrate on the construction of scaffold structures to provide an extracellular environment, while scaffold-free strategies primarily emphasize the assembly methods of building blocks. Different biofabrication technologies have their advantages and limitations. This review provides an overview of the mechanisms, advantages, and limitations of scaffold-based and scaffold-free strategies in tissue engineering. It also compares the strengths and weaknesses of these two strategies, along with their respective suitability under different conditions. Moreover, the significant challenges in the future development of convergence strategies, specifically the integration of scaffold-based and scaffold-free approaches, are examined in an objective manner. This review concludes that integrating scaffold-based and scaffold-free strategies could overcome the problems in the biofabrication of MTOs. A novel fabrication method, the BioMicroMesh method, is proposed based on the convergence strategy. Concurrently, the development of a desktop-scale integrated intelligent biofabrication device, the BioMicroMesh system, is underway. This system is tailored to the BioMicroMesh method and incorporates cell aggregate spheroids preparation, 3D bioprinting, bioassembly, and multi-organoid co-culture functions, providing an objective perspective on its capabilities.
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 221
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Vascularization Strategies in 3D Cell Culture Models: From Scaffold-Free Models to 3D Bioprinting
    Anthon, Shamapto Guha
    Valente, Karolina Papera
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2022, 23 (23)
  • [2] Human Skin 3D Bioprinting Using Scaffold-Free Approach
    Pourchet, Lea J.
    Thepot, Amelie
    Albouy, Marion
    Courtial, Edwin J.
    Boher, Aurelie
    Blum, Loic J.
    Marquette, Christophe A.
    ADVANCED HEALTHCARE MATERIALS, 2017, 6 (04)
  • [3] Modelling glioma invasion using 3D bioprinting and scaffold-free 3D culture
    van Pel, Derek M.
    Harada, Kaori
    Song, Dandan
    Naus, Christian C.
    Sin, Wun Chey
    JOURNAL OF CELL COMMUNICATION AND SIGNALING, 2018, 12 (04) : 723 - 730
  • [4] Modelling glioma invasion using 3D bioprinting and scaffold-free 3D culture
    Derek M. van Pel
    Kaori Harada
    Dandan Song
    Christian C. Naus
    Wun Chey Sin
    Journal of Cell Communication and Signaling, 2018, 12 : 723 - 730
  • [5] 3D printing facilitated scaffold-free tissue unit fabrication
    Tan, Yu
    Richards, Dylan J.
    Trusk, Thomas C.
    Visconti, Richard P.
    Yost, Michael J.
    Kindy, Mark S.
    Drake, Christopher J.
    Argraves, William Scott
    Markwald, Roger R.
    Mei, Ying
    BIOFABRICATION, 2014, 6 (02)
  • [6] 3D bioprinting of multi-cellular tumor microenvironment for prostate cancer metastasis
    Xu, Kailei
    Huang, Yuye
    Wu, Miaoben
    Yin, Jun
    Wei, Peng
    BIOFABRICATION, 2023, 15 (03)
  • [7] Directed self-assembly of large scaffold-free multi-cellular honeycomb structures
    Tejavibulya, Nalin
    Youssef, Jacquelyn
    Bao, Brian
    Ferruccio, Toni-Marie
    Morgan, Jeffrey R.
    BIOFABRICATION, 2011, 3 (03)
  • [8] Scaffold-free 3D-bioprinting of human extrahepatic bile duct
    Saglam, K.
    Zhang, W.
    Smith, L. J.
    Isidan, A.
    Chen, A. M.
    Naqvi, R. A.
    Gramelspacher, E.
    Li, P.
    Ekser, B.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 103 (08) : 97 - 97
  • [9] SCAFFOLD-FREE 3D CHOLANGIOCYTE ORGANOIDS TO STUDY THE PROGRESSION OF PRIMARY SCLEROSING CHOLANGITIS (PSC)
    Zhang, Wenjun
    Isidan, Abdulkadir
    Park, Yujin
    Kyritsi, Konstantina
    Li, Ping
    Cross-Najafi, Arthur A.
    Lopez, Kevin
    Kennedy, Lindsey
    Sato, Keisaku
    Glaser, Shannon S.
    Francis, Heather L.
    Alpini, Gianfranco
    Ekser, Burcin
    HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 76 : S196 - S197
  • [10] Scaffold-Free 3D-Bioprinting of Human Extrahepatic Bile Duct
    Saglam, K.
    Zhang, W.
    Smith, L. J.
    Isidan, A.
    Chen, A. M.
    Naqvi, R. A.
    Gramelspacher, E.
    Li, P.
    Ekser, B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 19 : 922 - 922