The quest for certainty: Introducing zoning into a discretionary system in England and the European experience

被引:3
|
作者
Dembski, Sebastian [1 ]
O'Brien, Phil [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Dept Geog & Planning, Roxby Bldg, Liverpool L69 7ZT, England
[2] Univ Glasgow, Sch Social & Polit Sci, Adam Smith Bldg, Glasgow G12 8RT, Scotland
关键词
Planning systems; legal certainty; flexibility; England; Europe; FLEXIBILITY; RESPONSIVENESS; CONSEQUENCES; POLICY; URBAN;
D O I
10.14512/rur.1695
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
The critique of planning and new proposals to reform the En-glish planning system and "rethink planning from first prin-ciples" have led to the introduction of rules-based principles into what is regarded as the paradigm of a discretionary plan-ning system, culminating in a recent White Paper, which it is claimed will create a faster and better planning system than the existing discretionary approach. But are these proposals based on an oversimplified understanding of the differences between discretionary and regulatory models, neglecting, for example, the negotiation between stakeholders and the flex-ibility which also exists in regulatory planning systems? Our contribution will review some of the recent changes of the En-glish planning system and reflect on experiences with zoning in European countries to bust the myth that the planning re-form claims to address: the possibility to combine faster de-cision making with better place making and less interference from local planning authorities.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 590
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条