Refining the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:10
|
作者
Francis, Ellen C. [1 ]
Powe, Camille E. [2 ]
Lowe, William L., Jr. [3 ]
White, Sara L. [4 ]
Scholtens, Denise M. [5 ]
Yang, Jiaxi [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Zhu, Yeyi [9 ]
Zhang, Cuilin [6 ,7 ,8 ,10 ]
Hivert, Marie-France [2 ,11 ]
Kwak, Soo Heon [12 ]
Sweeting, Arianne [13 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
[2] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Diabet Unit, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Med, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Kings Coll London, Dept Women & Childrens Hlth, London, England
[5] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Prevent Med, Div Biostat, Chicago, IL USA
[6] Natl Univ Singapore, Global Ctr Asian Womens Hlth GloW, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Singapore, Singapore
[7] Natl Univ Singapore, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Singapore, Singapore
[8] Natl Univ Singapore, Bia Echo Asia Ctr Reprod Longev & Equal ACRLE, Yong Loo Lin Sch Med, Singapore, Singapore
[9] Kaiser Permanente Northern Calif Div Res, Oakland, CA USA
[10] Harvard TH Chan Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Nutr, Boston, MA USA
[11] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Populat Med, Harvard Pilgrim Hlth Care Inst, Boston, MA USA
[12] Seoul Natl Univ, Coll Med, Seoul Natl Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Seoul, South Korea
[13] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Sydney, NSW, Australia
来源
COMMUNICATIONS MEDICINE | 2023年 / 3卷 / 01期
基金
澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
BODY-MASS INDEX; WORLD-HEALTH-ORGANIZATION; WEIGHT-GAIN; BIRTH-WEIGHT; INSULIN SENSITIVITY; PERINATAL OUTCOMES; MATERNAL OBESITY; PREGNANT-WOMEN; HYPERTENSIVE DISORDERS; NEONATAL HYPOGLYCEMIA;
D O I
10.1038/s43856-023-00393-8
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
BackgroundPerinatal outcomes vary for women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The precise factors beyond glycemic status that may refine GDM diagnosis remain unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of potential precision markers for GDM.MethodsSystematic literature searches were performed in PubMed and EMBASE from inception to March 2022 for studies comparing perinatal outcomes among women with GDM. We searched for precision markers in the following categories: maternal anthropometrics, clinical/sociocultural factors, non-glycemic biochemical markers, genetics/genomics or other -omics, and fetal biometry. We conducted post-hoc meta-analyses of a subset of studies with data on the association of maternal body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) with offspring macrosomia or large-for-gestational age (LGA).ResultsA total of 5905 titles/abstracts were screened, 775 full-texts reviewed, and 137 studies synthesized. Maternal anthropometrics were the most frequent risk marker. Meta-analysis demonstrated that women with GDM and overweight/obesity vs. GDM with normal range BMI are at higher risk of offspring macrosomia (13 studies [n = 28,763]; odds ratio [OR] 2.65; 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.91, 3.68), and LGA (10 studies [n = 20,070]; OR 2.23; 95% CI 2.00, 2.49). Lipids and insulin resistance/secretion indices were the most studied non-glycemic biochemical markers, with increased triglycerides and insulin resistance generally associated with greater risk of offspring macrosomia or LGA. Studies evaluating other markers had inconsistent findings as to whether they could be used as precision markers.ConclusionsMaternal overweight/obesity is associated with greater risk of offspring macrosomia or LGA in women with GDM. Pregnancy insulin resistance or hypertriglyceridemia may be useful in GDM risk stratification. Future studies examining non-glycemic biochemical, genetic, other -omic, or sociocultural precision markers among women with GDM are warranted. Gestational Diabetes (GDM) is high blood sugar that develops during pregnancy and may cause complications. GDM diagnosis is centered on blood sugar levels. Despite everyone receiving standard treatment, the clinical outcomes may vary from one individual to another. This indicates a need to identify factors that may help GDM diagnosis and result in improved classification of those at greatest risk for complications. Here, we systematically analyzed all published evidence for potential markers that could identify those with GDM who have greater risk of complications. We find that high maternal weight is a risk factor for offspring born larger for their gestational age. Other promising markers were identified, but further analysis is needed before they can be applied in the clinic. Francis et al. perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate studies comparing perinatal outcomes among individuals with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Their review and post hoc analysis find that maternal preconception weight and non-glucose-dependent biochemical markers could be a precision diagnostic approach to reducing variability in clinical outcomes following treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Refining the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ellen C. Francis
    Camille E. Powe
    William L. Lowe
    Sara L. White
    Denise M. Scholtens
    Jiaxi Yang
    Yeyi Zhu
    Cuilin Zhang
    Marie-France Hivert
    Soo Heon Kwak
    Arianne Sweeting
    [J]. Communications Medicine, 3
  • [2] Asymmetric dimethylarginine and gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tiong, Patricia
    Kosmider, Logan
    Lassi, Zohra S.
    Arstall, Margaret A.
    Andraweera, Prabha H.
    [J]. ENDOCRINE, 2023, 80 (02) : 283 - 291
  • [3] Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in Pakistan: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Muhammad Adnan
    Muhammad Aasim
    [J]. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 24
  • [4] Asymmetric dimethylarginine and gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Patricia Tiong
    Logan Kosmider
    Zohra S. Lassi
    Margaret A. Arstall
    Prabha H. Andraweera
    [J]. Endocrine, 2023, 80 : 283 - 291
  • [5] Gestational diabetes mellitus prevalence in Brazil: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mocellin, Lucas Pitrez
    Gomes, Hewellynn de Azeredo
    Sona, Lincoln
    Giacomini, Gabrielle Maria
    Pizzuti, Eduarda Pires
    Nunes, Gabrieli Borges
    Zanchet, Tulio Marcos
    de Macedo, Juliana Lopes
    [J]. CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2024, 40 (08):
  • [6] Telemedicine interventions for gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rasekaba, Tshepo M.
    Furler, John
    Blackberry, Irene
    Tacey, Mark
    Gray, Kathleen
    Lim, Kwang
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2015, 110 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [7] A portrait of gestational diabetes mellitus in Brazil: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Iser, Betine Pinto Moehlecke
    Stein, Caroline
    Alves, Luisia Feichas
    Carvalho, Morgana Lourenco de Souza
    Espinoza, Sergio Angelo Rojas
    Schmidt, Maria Ines
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF ENDOCRINOLOGY METABOLISM, 2022, 67 (06):
  • [8] Homocysteine level and gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zheng, Yang
    Deng, Hai-Yan
    Qiao, Zeng-Yong
    Gong, Fang-Xiao
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 37 (11) : 987 - 994
  • [9] Proteomics Studies in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Sriboonvorakul, Natthida
    Hu, Jiamiao
    Boriboonhirunsarn, Dittakarn
    Ng, Leong Loke
    Tan, Bee Kang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (10)
  • [10] Effect of Treatment of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Poolsup, Nalinee
    Suksomboon, Naeti
    Amin, Muhammad
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (03):