Sustainability of facilities built under the Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) implementation: Moving from basic to safe facilities on the sanitation ladder

被引:3
|
作者
Kouassi, Hemez Ange Aurelien [1 ]
Andrianisa, Harinaivo Anderson [1 ]
Sossou, Seyram Kossi [1 ]
Traore, Maimouna Bologo [1 ]
Nguematio, Rikyelle Momo [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Int Ingn Eau & Environm 2iE, Lab Eaux Hydrosyst & Agr LEHSA, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 11期
关键词
PIT LATRINES; INTERVENTION; QUALITY; HYGIENE; IMPACT; MALI;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0293395
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In the context of monitoring progress towards SDG target 6.2, a household is counted to have access to sanitation if it uses at least basic sanitation services. Several approaches have been employed to help rural communities to climb up the sanitation ladder such as Community-led Total Sanitation (CLTS), whose primary target is to end open defecation through behavior change. CLTS does not subsidize sanitation facilities, but let households build their own facilities. The types and sustainability of facilities when construction is entrusted to households without guidelines remain understudied. The contribution of CLTS in achieving SDG6.2 also have not been studied. This paper addresses these gaps. Conducted in the province of Sissili in Burkina Faso, our study involved interviewing CLTS implementers, government officials, and community stakeholders. Coupled with household surveys, the data was analyzed using SPSS and Excel software. Findings indicate that CLTS succeeded in motivating households to build latrines hence escalating latrine coverage from 29.51% in 2016 (pre-CLTS) to 90.44% in 2020 (post-CLTS) in the province. However, 97.53% of latrines built were unimproved pit latrines with superstructures and without/with wooden or clay slabs and no roof, of which 19.76% collapsed during the rainy season. During this period, sanitation access rate rose from 11.9% to 17.00%. The study has therefore revealed that CLTS significantly elevates latrine coverage, yet it does not guarantee a proportional rise in sanitation access. This discrepancy results from the type of technologies generated by CLTS, which are not considered in calculating the sanitation access rate due to their unimproved nature. Consequently, further exploration of social approaches is essential, amalgamating technical and engineering aspects. Beyond socio-economic considerations, the sustainability of CLTS and the achievement of access to adequate and safe sanitation also rely on the robustness and resilience of the implemented facilities.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Policy Diffusion in the Rural Sanitation Sector: Lessons from Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS)
    Zuin, Valentina
    Delaire, Caroline
    Peletz, Rachel
    Cock-Esteb, Alicea
    Khush, Ranjiv
    Albert, Jeff
    [J]. WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 124
  • [2] Mobility up the sanitation ladder following community-led total sanitation in rural Zambia
    Russpatrick, Scott
    Tiwari, Amy
    Markle, Laurie
    Musonda, Engervell
    Mutunda, Anne
    Osbert, Nicolas
    Pinfold, John
    Winters, Anna
    Winters, Benjamin
    Larsen, David A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER SANITATION AND HYGIENE FOR DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 7 (03) : 436 - 444
  • [3] Is there a role for external technical support in the Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) approach?
    Papafilippou, Nikolaos
    Templeton, Michael R.
    Ali, Mansoor
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLANNING REVIEW, 2011, 33 (01) : 81 - 94
  • [4] Sustainability of community-led total sanitation outcomes: Evidence from Ethiopia and Ghana
    Crocker, Jonny
    Saywell, Darren
    Bartram, Jamie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYGIENE AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2017, 220 (03) : 551 - 557
  • [5] Community led total sanitation (CLTS): Addressing the challenges of scale and sustainability in rural Africa
    Sah, Sameer
    Negussie, Amsalu
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2009, 248 (1-3) : 666 - 672
  • [6] MOBILITY UP AND DOWN THE SANITATION LADDER IN RURAL COMMUNITIES OF ZAMBIA FOLLOWING COMMUNITY-LED TOTAL SANITATION TRIGGERING
    Russpatrick, Scott
    Berkowitz, Jillian
    Katooka, Oswell
    Lukama, Chinyama
    Manangi, Abel
    Markle, Laurie
    Matimelo, Selenia
    Mboshya, Paul
    Mupango, Tumba
    Mukosha, Leonard
    Musonda, Engervell
    Mutunda, Anne
    Ngambi, Joseph
    Osbert, Nicolas
    Pinfold, John
    Tiwari, Amy
    Winters, Benjamin
    Larsen, David A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2015, 93 (04): : 175 - 175
  • [7] The potential of composting toilets in addressing the challenges of faecal sludge management in community-led total sanitation (CLTS)
    Mariwah, Simon
    Drangert, Jan-Olof
    Adams, Ellis Adjei
    [J]. GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 17 (12) : 3802 - 3814
  • [8] Impact of COVID-19 on community-led total sanitation (CLTS) in Ghana: perspectives of implementing partners
    Tsekpetse-Akuamoah, Kweku
    Mariwah, Simon
    Boateng, Ebenezer Nana Kwaku
    Adjakloe, Yvonne Ami
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WATER SANITATION AND HYGIENE FOR DEVELOPMENT, 2022, 12 (04) : 387 - 393
  • [9] How does Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) affect latrine ownership? A quantitative case study from Mozambique
    Miriam Harter
    Sebastian Mosch
    Hans-Joachim Mosler
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 18
  • [10] How does Community-Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) affect latrine ownership? A quantitative case study from Mozambique
    Harter, Miriam
    Mosch, Sebastian
    Mosler, Hans-Joachim
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 18