Immediate post-mastectomy prepectoral breast reconstruction with animal derived acellular dermal matrices: A systematic review

被引:3
|
作者
Tellarini, Annachiara [1 ,3 ]
Garutti, Leonardo [1 ]
Corno, Martina [1 ]
Tamborini, Federico [1 ,2 ]
Paganini, Ferruccio [1 ]
Fasoli, Veronica [1 ]
Di Giovanna, Danilo [1 ]
Valdatta, Luigi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Insubria, Dept Biotechnol & Life Sci, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Varese, Italy
[2] ASST Settelaghi Varese, Microsurg & Hand Surg Unit, Varese, Italy
[3] Univ Insubria, Dept Biotechnol & Life Sci, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Via Ravasi 2, I-21100 Varese, Italy
关键词
Prepectoral; Breast; reconstruction; Breast implant; Acellular Dermal Matrix; Breast cancer; Muscle; -sparing; FOLLOW-UP; CAPSULAR CONTRACTURE; IMPLANT; ADM; COVERAGE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.bjps.2023.08.020
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Animal-derived acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) are increasingly being used in prepectoral direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction. However, the indications and complication profile associated with this type of reconstruction remain unclear. This study aimed to perform a systematic review of the available literature on the use of animal-derived ADM in prepectoral DTI breast reconstruction. Methods: Three different literature databases, namely, PubMed, Web of Sciences, and Embase were screened using the following keywords: "immediate" AND "pre-pectoral" OR "prepectoral" AND "ADM breast reconstruction." Animal-derived ADM used (porcine - Braxon (R) and non-Braxon (R) - and bovine - Surgimend (R)) anthropometric information, clinical data, and complications profile were considered. Results: A total of 340 articles were initially identified, of which only 45 articles (5089 patients and 6598 reconstructed breasts) satisfied our inclusion criteria. The most widely used ADM was Braxon (R) in the context of conservative mastectomies. In most studies, a subcutaneous layer > 1 cm and lack of previous radiotherapy were considered prerequisites for this type of reconstruction. An increased risk of complications was found in smokers, patients who underwent radiation treatment, patients with high breast volumes, and patients with cancers requiring axillary dissection. Data related to the role of diabetes, high body mass index, and breast implant size on surgical outcomes were instead inconcludent. Age was not directly proportional to the complications. Conclusion: The complications associated with different animal-derived ADMs are generally comparable. The profile of patients required for eligibility for this type of reconstruction appears to have been identified and is in line with current recommendations. (c) 2023 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:94 / 108
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Immediate Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction Without Acellular Dermal Matrices: Preliminary Results
    Bouhadana, Gabriel
    Chocron, Yehuda
    Azzi, Alain J.
    Davison, Peter G.
    PLASTIC SURGERY, 2023,
  • [2] Systematic Review: Immediate vs Delayed Breast Reconstruction Post-mastectomy
    D'Souza, N.
    Darmanin, G.
    Fedorowicz, Z.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 : S191 - S192
  • [3] Nipple sparing mastectomy with prepectoral immediate prosthetic reconstruction without acellular dermal matrices: a single center experience
    Scardina, Lorenzo
    Di Leone, Alba
    Sanchez, Alejandro M.
    D'Archi, Sabatino
    Biondi, Ersilia
    Franco, Antonio
    Mason, Elena J.
    Magno, Stefano
    Terribile, Daniela
    Barone-Adesi, Liliana
    Visconti, Giuseppe
    Salgarello, Marzia
    Masetti, Riccardo
    Franceschini, Gianluca
    MINERVA SURGERY, 2021, 76 (06): : 498 - 505
  • [4] Single stage immediate breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix and implant: Defining the risks and outcomes of post-mastectomy radiotherapy
    Apte, Anuradha
    Walsh, Maia
    Balaji, Prashanth
    Khor, Boyuan
    Chandrasekharan, Sankaran
    Chakravorty, Arunmoy
    SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2020, 18 (04): : 202 - 207
  • [5] Trends in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction types at a breast cancer tertiary referral centre before and after introduction of acellular dermal matrices
    Kankam, Hadyn K. N.
    Hourston, George J. M.
    Fopp, Laura J.
    Benson, John R.
    Benyon, Sarah L.
    Irwin, Michael S.
    Agrawal, Amit
    Forouhi, Parto
    Malata, Charles M.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2018, 71 (01): : 21 - 27
  • [6] The psychological impacts of post-mastectomy breast reconstruction: a systematic review
    Roy, Nikita
    Downes, Margaret H.
    Ibelli, Taylor
    Amakiri, Uchechukwu O.
    Li, Troy
    Tebha, Sameer Saleem
    Balija, Tara M.
    Schnur, Julie B.
    Montgomery, Guy H.
    Henderson, Peter W.
    ANNALS OF BREAST SURGERY, 2024, 8
  • [7] Prepectoral breast reconstruction is safe in the setting of post-mastectomy radiation therapy
    Long, Chao
    Kraenzlin, Franca
    Aravind, Pathik
    Kokosis, George
    Yesantharao, Pooja
    Sacks, Justin M.
    Rosson, Gedge D.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2022, 75 (09): : 3041 - 3047
  • [8] Temporal trends in immediate post-mastectomy breast reconstruction
    Nayyar, Apoorve
    Reddy, Karishma G.
    Strassle, Paula D.
    Moses, Cara G.
    Roughton, Michelle C.
    Gallagher, Kristalyn K.
    McGuire, Kandace P.
    JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2019, 72 (03): : 525 - 527
  • [9] Is Post-mastectomy Irradiation Delayed by Immediate Breast Reconstruction?
    Petit, A.
    Bourdarias, L.
    Lagarde, P.
    de Lara, C. Tunon
    Breton-Callu, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 48 : S188 - S188
  • [10] Variations in the utilization of immediate post-mastectomy breast reconstruction
    Nayyar, Apoorve
    Strassle, Paula D.
    Reddy, Karishma G.
    Jameison, Danielle I.
    Moses, Cara G.
    Roughton, Michelle C.
    McGuire, Kandace P.
    Gallagher, Kristalyn K.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 218 (04): : 712 - 715