Bacterial detoxification of plant defence secondary metabolites mediates the interaction between a shrub and frugivorous birds

被引:3
|
作者
Trabelcy, Beny [1 ]
Shteindel, Nimrod [1 ]
Lalzar, Maya [2 ]
Izhaki, Ido [1 ]
Gerchman, Yoram [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Haifa, Fac Nat Sci, Dept Evolutionary & Environm Biol, IL-3498838 Haifa, Israel
[2] Univ Haifa, Bioinformat Unit, Haifa, Israel
[3] Oranim Coll, Kiryat Tivon 3600600, Palestine
关键词
SEED DISPERSAL; MYROSINASE; FRUITS;
D O I
10.1038/s41467-023-37525-6
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The interactions between plants and frugivores are mediated by plants' secondary metabolites. Here the authors demonstrate that specific bacteria, capable of consuming these metabolites, can alter these interactions, benefiting both plants and fruit consumers. Many plants produce fleshy fruits, attracting fruit-eating animals that disperse the seeds in their droppings. Such seed dispersal results in a conflict between the plant and the animal, as digestion of seeds can be highly beneficial to the animal but reduces plant fitness. The plant Ochradenus baccatus uses the myrosinase-glucosinolates system to protect its seeds. We show that hydrolysis of the O. baccatus fruit glucosinolates by the myrosinase enzyme inhibited digestive enzymes and hampered digestion in naive individuals of the bird Pycnonotus xanthopygos. However, digestion in birds regularly feeding on O. baccatus fruits was unaffected. We find that Pantoea bacteria, dominating the gut of these experienced birds as well as the fruits, thrive on glucosinolates hydrolysis products in culture. Augmentation of Pantoea protects both naive birds and plant seedlings from the effects of glucosinolates hydrolysis products. Our findings demonstrate a tripartite interaction, where the plant-bird mutually beneficial interactions are mediated by a communal bacterial tenant.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bacterial detoxification of plant defence secondary metabolites mediates the interaction between a shrub and frugivorous birds
    Beny Trabelcy
    Nimrod Shteindel
    Maya Lalzar
    Ido Izhaki
    Yoram Gerchman
    Nature Communications, 14
  • [2] In this issue: secondary metabolites and plant defence
    Heath, MC
    PHYSIOLOGICAL AND MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2002, 60 (06) : 273 - 274
  • [3] Modularity in ecological networks between frugivorous birds and congeneric plant species
    Silva, Adriano M.
    Maruyama, Pietro K.
    Paniago, Luis Pedro M.
    Melo, Celine
    JOURNAL OF TROPICAL ECOLOGY, 2016, 32 : 526 - 535
  • [4] INTERACTION BETWEEN FRUGIVOROUS BIRDS AND PLANTS IN THE FOREST OF CHILOE - OPPORTUNISM OR COEVOLUTION
    ARMESTO, JJ
    ROZZI, R
    ARCHIVOS DE BIOLOGIA Y MEDICINA EXPERIMENTALES, 1987, 20 (02): : R146 - R146
  • [5] Secondary metabolites as allelochemicals in plant defence against microorganisms of the phyllosphere
    Karamanoli, K
    ALLELOPATHY: FROM MOLECULES TO ECOSYSTEMS, 2002, : 277 - 288
  • [6] ROLE OF SECONDARY METABOLITES ON PLANT-PLANT INTERACTION
    NISHIMURA, H
    NIPPON NOGEIKAGAKU KAISHI-JOURNAL OF THE JAPAN SOCIETY FOR BIOSCIENCE BIOTECHNOLOGY AND AGROCHEMISTRY, 1988, 62 (06): : 986 - 989
  • [7] Biosynthetic Mechanisms of Secondary Metabolites Promoted by the Interaction Between Endophytes and Plant Hosts
    Li, Zhaogao
    Wen, Weie
    Qin, Ming
    He, Yuqi
    Xu, Delin
    Li, Lin
    FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [8] Genetics of bacterial community responses to plant secondary metabolites
    Rouyer, L.
    Schandry, N.
    Becker, C.
    MOLECULAR PLANT-MICROBE INTERACTIONS, 2024, 37 (05) : 112 - 112
  • [9] Interaction between frugivorous vertebrates and two plant species of the genus Spondias
    Sampaio, Rebeca A. P.
    Moreira, Danielle O.
    de Assis, Andre M.
    Mendes, Sergio L.
    Gatti, Andressa
    ANIMAL BIOLOGY, 2019, 69 (02) : 231 - 246
  • [10] Pharmacological perspectives on the detoxification of plant secondary metabolites: Implications for ingestive behavior of herbivores
    McLean, Stuart
    Duncan, Alan J.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ECOLOGY, 2006, 32 (06) : 1213 - 1228